Cargando…
Dose prescription in carbon ion radiotherapy: How to compare two different RBE-weighted dose calculation systems
Background and purpose: In carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT), the use of different relative biological effectiveness (RBE) models in the RBE-weighted dose $(D_{RBE})$ calculation can lead to deviations in the physical dose $(D_{phy})$ delivered to the patient. Our aim is to reduce target $D_{phy}$ devi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.031 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2267163 |
_version_ | 1780954625993605120 |
---|---|
author | Molinelli, Silvia Magro, Giuseppe Mairani, Andrea Matsufuji, Naruhiro Kanematsu, Nobuyuki Inaniwa, Taku Mirandola, Alfredo Russo, Stefania Mastella, Edoardo Hasegawa, Azusa Tsuji, Hiroshi Yamada, Shigeru Vischioni, Barbara Vitolo, Viviana Ferrari, Alfredo Ciocca, Mario Kamada, Tadashi Tsujii, Hirohiko Orecchia, Roberto Fossati, Piero |
author_facet | Molinelli, Silvia Magro, Giuseppe Mairani, Andrea Matsufuji, Naruhiro Kanematsu, Nobuyuki Inaniwa, Taku Mirandola, Alfredo Russo, Stefania Mastella, Edoardo Hasegawa, Azusa Tsuji, Hiroshi Yamada, Shigeru Vischioni, Barbara Vitolo, Viviana Ferrari, Alfredo Ciocca, Mario Kamada, Tadashi Tsujii, Hirohiko Orecchia, Roberto Fossati, Piero |
author_sort | Molinelli, Silvia |
collection | CERN |
description | Background and purpose: In carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT), the use of different relative biological effectiveness (RBE) models in the RBE-weighted dose $(D_{RBE})$ calculation can lead to deviations in the physical dose $(D_{phy})$ delivered to the patient. Our aim is to reduce target $D_{phy}$ deviations by converting prescription dose values. Material and methods: Planning data of patients treated at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS) were collected, with prescribed doses per fraction ranging from 3.6 Gy (RBE) to 4.6 Gy (RBE), according to the Japanese semi-empirical model. The $D_{phy}$ was Monte Carlo (MC) re-calculated simulating the NIRS beamline. The local effect model (LEM)_I was then applied to estimate $D_{RBE}$. Target median $D_{RBE}$ ratios between MC + LEM_I and NIRS plans determined correction factors for the conversion of prescription doses. Plans were re-optimized in a LEM_I-based commercial system, prescribing the NIRS uncorrected and corrected $D_{RBE}$. Results: The MC + LEM_I target median $D_{RBE}$ was respectively 15% and 5% higher than the NIRS reference, for the lowest and highest dose levels. Uncorrected $D_{RBE}$ prescription resulted in significantly lower target $D_{phy}$ in re-optimized plans, with respect to NIRS plans. Conclusions: Prescription dose conversion factors could minimize target physical dose variations due to the use of different radiobiological models in the calculation of CIRT RBE-weighted dose. |
id | oai-inspirehep.net-1601954 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2016 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | oai-inspirehep.net-16019542019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.031http://cds.cern.ch/record/2267163engMolinelli, SilviaMagro, GiuseppeMairani, AndreaMatsufuji, NaruhiroKanematsu, NobuyukiInaniwa, TakuMirandola, AlfredoRusso, StefaniaMastella, EdoardoHasegawa, AzusaTsuji, HiroshiYamada, ShigeruVischioni, BarbaraVitolo, VivianaFerrari, AlfredoCiocca, MarioKamada, TadashiTsujii, HirohikoOrecchia, RobertoFossati, PieroDose prescription in carbon ion radiotherapy: How to compare two different RBE-weighted dose calculation systemsOtherBackground and purpose: In carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT), the use of different relative biological effectiveness (RBE) models in the RBE-weighted dose $(D_{RBE})$ calculation can lead to deviations in the physical dose $(D_{phy})$ delivered to the patient. Our aim is to reduce target $D_{phy}$ deviations by converting prescription dose values. Material and methods: Planning data of patients treated at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS) were collected, with prescribed doses per fraction ranging from 3.6 Gy (RBE) to 4.6 Gy (RBE), according to the Japanese semi-empirical model. The $D_{phy}$ was Monte Carlo (MC) re-calculated simulating the NIRS beamline. The local effect model (LEM)_I was then applied to estimate $D_{RBE}$. Target median $D_{RBE}$ ratios between MC + LEM_I and NIRS plans determined correction factors for the conversion of prescription doses. Plans were re-optimized in a LEM_I-based commercial system, prescribing the NIRS uncorrected and corrected $D_{RBE}$. Results: The MC + LEM_I target median $D_{RBE}$ was respectively 15% and 5% higher than the NIRS reference, for the lowest and highest dose levels. Uncorrected $D_{RBE}$ prescription resulted in significantly lower target $D_{phy}$ in re-optimized plans, with respect to NIRS plans. Conclusions: Prescription dose conversion factors could minimize target physical dose variations due to the use of different radiobiological models in the calculation of CIRT RBE-weighted dose.oai:inspirehep.net:16019542016 |
spellingShingle | Other Molinelli, Silvia Magro, Giuseppe Mairani, Andrea Matsufuji, Naruhiro Kanematsu, Nobuyuki Inaniwa, Taku Mirandola, Alfredo Russo, Stefania Mastella, Edoardo Hasegawa, Azusa Tsuji, Hiroshi Yamada, Shigeru Vischioni, Barbara Vitolo, Viviana Ferrari, Alfredo Ciocca, Mario Kamada, Tadashi Tsujii, Hirohiko Orecchia, Roberto Fossati, Piero Dose prescription in carbon ion radiotherapy: How to compare two different RBE-weighted dose calculation systems |
title | Dose prescription in carbon ion radiotherapy: How to compare two different RBE-weighted dose calculation systems |
title_full | Dose prescription in carbon ion radiotherapy: How to compare two different RBE-weighted dose calculation systems |
title_fullStr | Dose prescription in carbon ion radiotherapy: How to compare two different RBE-weighted dose calculation systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Dose prescription in carbon ion radiotherapy: How to compare two different RBE-weighted dose calculation systems |
title_short | Dose prescription in carbon ion radiotherapy: How to compare two different RBE-weighted dose calculation systems |
title_sort | dose prescription in carbon ion radiotherapy: how to compare two different rbe-weighted dose calculation systems |
topic | Other |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.031 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2267163 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT molinellisilvia doseprescriptionincarbonionradiotherapyhowtocomparetwodifferentrbeweighteddosecalculationsystems AT magrogiuseppe doseprescriptionincarbonionradiotherapyhowtocomparetwodifferentrbeweighteddosecalculationsystems AT mairaniandrea doseprescriptionincarbonionradiotherapyhowtocomparetwodifferentrbeweighteddosecalculationsystems AT matsufujinaruhiro doseprescriptionincarbonionradiotherapyhowtocomparetwodifferentrbeweighteddosecalculationsystems AT kanematsunobuyuki doseprescriptionincarbonionradiotherapyhowtocomparetwodifferentrbeweighteddosecalculationsystems AT inaniwataku doseprescriptionincarbonionradiotherapyhowtocomparetwodifferentrbeweighteddosecalculationsystems AT mirandolaalfredo doseprescriptionincarbonionradiotherapyhowtocomparetwodifferentrbeweighteddosecalculationsystems AT russostefania doseprescriptionincarbonionradiotherapyhowtocomparetwodifferentrbeweighteddosecalculationsystems AT mastellaedoardo doseprescriptionincarbonionradiotherapyhowtocomparetwodifferentrbeweighteddosecalculationsystems AT hasegawaazusa doseprescriptionincarbonionradiotherapyhowtocomparetwodifferentrbeweighteddosecalculationsystems AT tsujihiroshi doseprescriptionincarbonionradiotherapyhowtocomparetwodifferentrbeweighteddosecalculationsystems AT yamadashigeru doseprescriptionincarbonionradiotherapyhowtocomparetwodifferentrbeweighteddosecalculationsystems AT vischionibarbara doseprescriptionincarbonionradiotherapyhowtocomparetwodifferentrbeweighteddosecalculationsystems AT vitoloviviana doseprescriptionincarbonionradiotherapyhowtocomparetwodifferentrbeweighteddosecalculationsystems AT ferrarialfredo doseprescriptionincarbonionradiotherapyhowtocomparetwodifferentrbeweighteddosecalculationsystems AT cioccamario doseprescriptionincarbonionradiotherapyhowtocomparetwodifferentrbeweighteddosecalculationsystems AT kamadatadashi doseprescriptionincarbonionradiotherapyhowtocomparetwodifferentrbeweighteddosecalculationsystems AT tsujiihirohiko doseprescriptionincarbonionradiotherapyhowtocomparetwodifferentrbeweighteddosecalculationsystems AT orecchiaroberto doseprescriptionincarbonionradiotherapyhowtocomparetwodifferentrbeweighteddosecalculationsystems AT fossatipiero doseprescriptionincarbonionradiotherapyhowtocomparetwodifferentrbeweighteddosecalculationsystems |