Cargando…
Nuclear deformation in the A≈100 region: Comparison between new masses and mean-field predictions
An extension of the atomic mass surface in the region A≈100 was performed via measurements of the $^{100−102}$Sr and $^{100−102}$Rb masses with the ion-trap spectrometer ISOLTRAP at CERN-ISOLDE, including the first direct mass determination of $^{100−102}$Sr and $^{100−102}$Rb. These measurements co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.014310 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2275945 |
_version_ | 1780955260138815488 |
---|---|
author | de Roubin, A Atanasov, D Blaum, K George, S Herfurth, F Kisler, D Kowalska, M Kreim, S Lunney, D Manea, V Minaya Ramirez, E Mougeot, M Neidherr, D Rosenbusch, M Schweikhard, L Welker, A Wienholtz, F Wolf, R N Zuber, K |
author_facet | de Roubin, A Atanasov, D Blaum, K George, S Herfurth, F Kisler, D Kowalska, M Kreim, S Lunney, D Manea, V Minaya Ramirez, E Mougeot, M Neidherr, D Rosenbusch, M Schweikhard, L Welker, A Wienholtz, F Wolf, R N Zuber, K |
author_sort | de Roubin, A |
collection | CERN |
description | An extension of the atomic mass surface in the region A≈100 was performed via measurements of the $^{100−102}$Sr and $^{100−102}$Rb masses with the ion-trap spectrometer ISOLTRAP at CERN-ISOLDE, including the first direct mass determination of $^{100−102}$Sr and $^{100−102}$Rb. These measurements confirm the continuation of the region of deformation with the increase of neutron number, at least as far as $N=65$. To interpret the deformation in the strontium isotopic chain and to determine whether an onset of deformation is present in heavier krypton isotopes, a comparison is made between the experimental values and mean-field and beyond mean-field results available in the literature. To complete this comparison Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov calculations for even and odd isotopes were performed, illustrating the competition of nuclear shapes in the region. |
id | oai-inspirehep.net-1610132 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2017 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | oai-inspirehep.net-16101322020-05-15T15:31:20Zdoi:10.1103/PhysRevC.96.014310http://cds.cern.ch/record/2275945engde Roubin, AAtanasov, DBlaum, KGeorge, SHerfurth, FKisler, DKowalska, MKreim, SLunney, DManea, VMinaya Ramirez, EMougeot, MNeidherr, DRosenbusch, MSchweikhard, LWelker, AWienholtz, FWolf, R NZuber, KNuclear deformation in the A≈100 region: Comparison between new masses and mean-field predictionsNuclear Physics - ExperimentAn extension of the atomic mass surface in the region A≈100 was performed via measurements of the $^{100−102}$Sr and $^{100−102}$Rb masses with the ion-trap spectrometer ISOLTRAP at CERN-ISOLDE, including the first direct mass determination of $^{100−102}$Sr and $^{100−102}$Rb. These measurements confirm the continuation of the region of deformation with the increase of neutron number, at least as far as $N=65$. To interpret the deformation in the strontium isotopic chain and to determine whether an onset of deformation is present in heavier krypton isotopes, a comparison is made between the experimental values and mean-field and beyond mean-field results available in the literature. To complete this comparison Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov calculations for even and odd isotopes were performed, illustrating the competition of nuclear shapes in the region.oai:inspirehep.net:16101322017 |
spellingShingle | Nuclear Physics - Experiment de Roubin, A Atanasov, D Blaum, K George, S Herfurth, F Kisler, D Kowalska, M Kreim, S Lunney, D Manea, V Minaya Ramirez, E Mougeot, M Neidherr, D Rosenbusch, M Schweikhard, L Welker, A Wienholtz, F Wolf, R N Zuber, K Nuclear deformation in the A≈100 region: Comparison between new masses and mean-field predictions |
title | Nuclear deformation in the A≈100 region: Comparison between new masses and mean-field predictions |
title_full | Nuclear deformation in the A≈100 region: Comparison between new masses and mean-field predictions |
title_fullStr | Nuclear deformation in the A≈100 region: Comparison between new masses and mean-field predictions |
title_full_unstemmed | Nuclear deformation in the A≈100 region: Comparison between new masses and mean-field predictions |
title_short | Nuclear deformation in the A≈100 region: Comparison between new masses and mean-field predictions |
title_sort | nuclear deformation in the a≈100 region: comparison between new masses and mean-field predictions |
topic | Nuclear Physics - Experiment |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.014310 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2275945 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deroubina nucleardeformationinthea100regioncomparisonbetweennewmassesandmeanfieldpredictions AT atanasovd nucleardeformationinthea100regioncomparisonbetweennewmassesandmeanfieldpredictions AT blaumk nucleardeformationinthea100regioncomparisonbetweennewmassesandmeanfieldpredictions AT georges nucleardeformationinthea100regioncomparisonbetweennewmassesandmeanfieldpredictions AT herfurthf nucleardeformationinthea100regioncomparisonbetweennewmassesandmeanfieldpredictions AT kislerd nucleardeformationinthea100regioncomparisonbetweennewmassesandmeanfieldpredictions AT kowalskam nucleardeformationinthea100regioncomparisonbetweennewmassesandmeanfieldpredictions AT kreims nucleardeformationinthea100regioncomparisonbetweennewmassesandmeanfieldpredictions AT lunneyd nucleardeformationinthea100regioncomparisonbetweennewmassesandmeanfieldpredictions AT maneav nucleardeformationinthea100regioncomparisonbetweennewmassesandmeanfieldpredictions AT minayaramireze nucleardeformationinthea100regioncomparisonbetweennewmassesandmeanfieldpredictions AT mougeotm nucleardeformationinthea100regioncomparisonbetweennewmassesandmeanfieldpredictions AT neidherrd nucleardeformationinthea100regioncomparisonbetweennewmassesandmeanfieldpredictions AT rosenbuschm nucleardeformationinthea100regioncomparisonbetweennewmassesandmeanfieldpredictions AT schweikhardl nucleardeformationinthea100regioncomparisonbetweennewmassesandmeanfieldpredictions AT welkera nucleardeformationinthea100regioncomparisonbetweennewmassesandmeanfieldpredictions AT wienholtzf nucleardeformationinthea100regioncomparisonbetweennewmassesandmeanfieldpredictions AT wolfrn nucleardeformationinthea100regioncomparisonbetweennewmassesandmeanfieldpredictions AT zuberk nucleardeformationinthea100regioncomparisonbetweennewmassesandmeanfieldpredictions |