Cargando…
Analysis of Cosmic Muons Measured in CMS Drift Chambers
Why do you study physics?" Which student of that subject does not know this question asked by a friend or acquaintance not being involved in scientific research? A typical answer starts with the native curiosity of men and ends with the Theory of Everything, which unfortunatly still has to be d...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://cds.cern.ch/record/2284026 |
Sumario: | Why do you study physics?" Which student of that subject does not know this question
asked by a friend or acquaintance not being involved in scientific research? A typical
answer starts with the native curiosity of men and ends with the Theory of Everything,
which unfortunatly still has to be developed even though there already are auspicious
approaches. Usually the next question from that person is "And what is that all good for?"
Typical replies from the scientist to-be are shrugged shoulders and a lack of understanding
for such a question. But let us start from scratch:
Ever since the dawn of civilisation people recognised certain rules and patterns within
their environment, such as night and day or the change of the seasons, and started to think
of mystic explanations for these observations. Later in the ancient world first theories arose
about the composition of matter: Demokrit's idea of atoms and Aristoteles' thesis of four
elements. Both suggestions had in common that they tried to reduce a broad spectrum of
matter properties to a compact set of constituents. But rightly, these persons are regarded
as philosophers and not as physicists simply because they did not make predictions that
could be compared to reality.
Physics from a modern point of view started when theories began to quantify expectations
and were tested through experiments for their validity. With the publication of
Newton's theory of motion and gravitation, his Principia Mathematica, physics entered a
new age in which nature decided about success or failure of an explanation. As history
shows, many long time accepted theories later were proven to be inaccurate, as experiments
became able to test their predictions on new scales, which resulted in modifications
of the models used or sometimes even in completely new ideas. The presumably greatest
leaps that followed that way were Maxwell's theory about electromagnetic phenomena,
Einstein's theories of relativity and quantum theory, developed by a number of now legendary
scientists. The common aim of all these ideas is the reduction of the complex
impression of the world to as few basic elements as possible, perhaps one day to a single
fundamental principle. But as that aim could not be reached until now it is appropriate
to divide the wide world of physics into some major fields, each with a different emphasis, of which one is particle physics.
Ratios of chemical reactions gave the first hints that matter consists of tiny lumps.
Later on it was discovered by Thomson that these atoms are not elementary and scattering
experiments with electrons by Lenard and with alpha particles by Geiger, Marsden and
Rutherford turned out that atoms are composed of electrons carrying a unit of negative
charge which surround a positively charged nucleus.
A new era with particle accelerators, allowing studies such as the structure of atomic
nuclei, revealed that protons and neutrons build up the atomic core. Furthermore, physicists
detected a large quantity of new, exotic particles being produced at high energies,
first by cosmic rays and later also in accelerator experiments. But it became clear that this
initial confusion is explainable by the existence of a few kinds of quarks being combined
following certain rules. The quarks are regarded as elementary until today.
The present state of particle physics is desribed by the so called Standard Model containing
not only these particles but also the forces that let them interact. This theory
already made a lot of predictions which could be confirmed by experiments. But one of the
main hypotheses is still left to be examined: the existence of the predicted Higgs particle
could only be excluded for masses smaller than 114 GeV/c2. To answer the question if
it does exist after all, and to look for the presence of phenomena beyond the Standard
Model, new, unevitably huge setups are required. Right now a new particle accelerator
called Large Hadron Collider, abbreviated as LHC, and its two major detectors Compact
Muon Solenoid (CMS) and A Toroidal LHC Apparatus (ATLAS) are under construction
at the research centre CERN near Geneva.
One part of the first mentioned CMS detector is a complex system for the detection of
particles called muons. This installation has been designed to be able to measure muons
being produced at the collision of accelerated particles and to recognise the signature
from the decay of possibly produced Higgs particles into four muons. The contribution
of the III. Phys. Inst. of RWTH Aachen University mainly consists of the development,
production and subsequent testing of drift chambers as a part of the muon system.
This diploma thesis concerns the analysis of data taken from drift chambers in a test
setup with cosmic muons with a first emphasis on the quality control of the production
and a second on the properties of just these cosmic particles as far as measurable. A major
part of this work was the development of a software that transforms the recorded data into
particle track descriptions from which the quality of a muon chamber can be deduced. As
a side effect in succession it was tried to confirm already known characteristics of cosmic
muons.
Now my trial to answer the question from above, what all this is good for, apart from
satisfying the curiosity to see how the world can be described: I don't know. Maybe the
technology and the knowledge gained by the challenge of finding the Higgs particle will
turn out to be useful in some way we do not think of now, as it has already happened
with earlier experiments. But I am not a prophet... |
---|