Cargando…

Dosimetric verification in water of a Monte Carlo treatment planning tool for proton, helium, carbon and oxygen ion beams at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center

The introduction of 'new' ion species in particle therapy needs to be supported by a thorough assessment of their dosimetric properties and by treatment planning comparisons with clinically used proton and carbon ion beams. In addition to the latter two ions, helium and oxygen ion beams ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tessonnier, T, Böhlen, TT, Ceruti, F, Ferrari, A, Sala, P, Brons, S, Haberer, T, Debus, J, Parodi, K, Mairani, A
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aa7be4
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2298743
_version_ 1780957024398344192
author Tessonnier, T
Böhlen, TT
Ceruti, F
Ferrari, A
Sala, P
Brons, S
Haberer, T
Debus, J
Parodi, K
Mairani, A
author_facet Tessonnier, T
Böhlen, TT
Ceruti, F
Ferrari, A
Sala, P
Brons, S
Haberer, T
Debus, J
Parodi, K
Mairani, A
author_sort Tessonnier, T
collection CERN
description The introduction of 'new' ion species in particle therapy needs to be supported by a thorough assessment of their dosimetric properties and by treatment planning comparisons with clinically used proton and carbon ion beams. In addition to the latter two ions, helium and oxygen ion beams are foreseen at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT) as potential assets for improving clinical outcomes in the near future. We present in this study a dosimetric validation of a FLUKA-based Monte Carlo treatment planning tool (MCTP) for protons, helium, carbon and oxygen ions for spread-out Bragg peaks in water. The comparisons between the ions show the dosimetric advantages of helium and heavier ion beams in terms of their distal and lateral fall-offs with respect to protons, reducing the lateral size of the region receiving 50% of the planned dose up to 12 mm. However, carbon and oxygen ions showed significant doses beyond the target due to the higher fragmentation tail compared to lighter ions (p and He), up to 25%. The Monte Carlo predictions were found to be in excellent geometrical agreement with the measurements, with deviations below 1 mm for all parameters investigated such as target and lateral size as well as distal fall-offs. Measured and simulated absolute dose values agreed within about 2.5% on the overall dose distributions. The MCTP tool, which supports the usage of multiple state-of-the-art relative biological effectiveness models, will provide a solid engine for treatment planning comparisons at HIT.
id oai-inspirehep.net-1618183
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2017
record_format invenio
spelling oai-inspirehep.net-16181832019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.1088/1361-6560/aa7be4http://cds.cern.ch/record/2298743engTessonnier, TBöhlen, TTCeruti, FFerrari, ASala, PBrons, SHaberer, TDebus, JParodi, KMairani, ADosimetric verification in water of a Monte Carlo treatment planning tool for proton, helium, carbon and oxygen ion beams at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy CenterHealth Physics and Radiation EffectsThe introduction of 'new' ion species in particle therapy needs to be supported by a thorough assessment of their dosimetric properties and by treatment planning comparisons with clinically used proton and carbon ion beams. In addition to the latter two ions, helium and oxygen ion beams are foreseen at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT) as potential assets for improving clinical outcomes in the near future. We present in this study a dosimetric validation of a FLUKA-based Monte Carlo treatment planning tool (MCTP) for protons, helium, carbon and oxygen ions for spread-out Bragg peaks in water. The comparisons between the ions show the dosimetric advantages of helium and heavier ion beams in terms of their distal and lateral fall-offs with respect to protons, reducing the lateral size of the region receiving 50% of the planned dose up to 12 mm. However, carbon and oxygen ions showed significant doses beyond the target due to the higher fragmentation tail compared to lighter ions (p and He), up to 25%. The Monte Carlo predictions were found to be in excellent geometrical agreement with the measurements, with deviations below 1 mm for all parameters investigated such as target and lateral size as well as distal fall-offs. Measured and simulated absolute dose values agreed within about 2.5% on the overall dose distributions. The MCTP tool, which supports the usage of multiple state-of-the-art relative biological effectiveness models, will provide a solid engine for treatment planning comparisons at HIT.oai:inspirehep.net:16181832017
spellingShingle Health Physics and Radiation Effects
Tessonnier, T
Böhlen, TT
Ceruti, F
Ferrari, A
Sala, P
Brons, S
Haberer, T
Debus, J
Parodi, K
Mairani, A
Dosimetric verification in water of a Monte Carlo treatment planning tool for proton, helium, carbon and oxygen ion beams at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center
title Dosimetric verification in water of a Monte Carlo treatment planning tool for proton, helium, carbon and oxygen ion beams at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center
title_full Dosimetric verification in water of a Monte Carlo treatment planning tool for proton, helium, carbon and oxygen ion beams at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center
title_fullStr Dosimetric verification in water of a Monte Carlo treatment planning tool for proton, helium, carbon and oxygen ion beams at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric verification in water of a Monte Carlo treatment planning tool for proton, helium, carbon and oxygen ion beams at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center
title_short Dosimetric verification in water of a Monte Carlo treatment planning tool for proton, helium, carbon and oxygen ion beams at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center
title_sort dosimetric verification in water of a monte carlo treatment planning tool for proton, helium, carbon and oxygen ion beams at the heidelberg ion beam therapy center
topic Health Physics and Radiation Effects
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aa7be4
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2298743
work_keys_str_mv AT tessonniert dosimetricverificationinwaterofamontecarlotreatmentplanningtoolforprotonheliumcarbonandoxygenionbeamsattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenter
AT bohlentt dosimetricverificationinwaterofamontecarlotreatmentplanningtoolforprotonheliumcarbonandoxygenionbeamsattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenter
AT cerutif dosimetricverificationinwaterofamontecarlotreatmentplanningtoolforprotonheliumcarbonandoxygenionbeamsattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenter
AT ferraria dosimetricverificationinwaterofamontecarlotreatmentplanningtoolforprotonheliumcarbonandoxygenionbeamsattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenter
AT salap dosimetricverificationinwaterofamontecarlotreatmentplanningtoolforprotonheliumcarbonandoxygenionbeamsattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenter
AT bronss dosimetricverificationinwaterofamontecarlotreatmentplanningtoolforprotonheliumcarbonandoxygenionbeamsattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenter
AT haberert dosimetricverificationinwaterofamontecarlotreatmentplanningtoolforprotonheliumcarbonandoxygenionbeamsattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenter
AT debusj dosimetricverificationinwaterofamontecarlotreatmentplanningtoolforprotonheliumcarbonandoxygenionbeamsattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenter
AT parodik dosimetricverificationinwaterofamontecarlotreatmentplanningtoolforprotonheliumcarbonandoxygenionbeamsattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenter
AT mairania dosimetricverificationinwaterofamontecarlotreatmentplanningtoolforprotonheliumcarbonandoxygenionbeamsattheheidelbergionbeamtherapycenter