Cargando…
A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment
Precise comparisons of the fundamental properties of matter–antimatter conjugates provide sensitive tests of charge–parity–time (CPT) invariance1, which is an important symmetry that rests on basic assumptions of the standard model of particle physics. Experiments on mesons2, leptons3, 4 and baryons...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature24048 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2291601 |
_version_ | 1780956436844511232 |
---|---|
author | Smorra, C Sellner, S Borchert, M J Harrington, J A Higuchi, T Nagahama, H Tanaka, T Mooser, A Schneider, G Blaum, K Matsuda, Y Ospelkaus, C Quint, W Walz, J Yamazaki, Y Ulmer, S |
author_facet | Smorra, C Sellner, S Borchert, M J Harrington, J A Higuchi, T Nagahama, H Tanaka, T Mooser, A Schneider, G Blaum, K Matsuda, Y Ospelkaus, C Quint, W Walz, J Yamazaki, Y Ulmer, S |
author_sort | Smorra, C |
collection | CERN |
description | Precise comparisons of the fundamental properties of matter–antimatter conjugates provide sensitive tests of charge–parity–time (CPT) invariance1, which is an important symmetry that rests on basic assumptions of the standard model of particle physics. Experiments on mesons2, leptons3, 4 and baryons5, 6 have compared different properties of matter–antimatter conjugates with fractional uncertainties at the parts-per-billion level or better. One specific quantity, however, has so far only been known to a fractional uncertainty at the parts-per-million level7, 8: the magnetic moment of the antiproton, . The extraordinary difficulty in measuring with high precision is caused by its intrinsic smallness; for example, it is 660 times smaller than the magnetic moment of the positron3. Here we report a high-precision measurement of in units of the nuclear magneton μN with a fractional precision of 1.5 parts per billion (68% confidence level). We use a two-particle spectroscopy method in an advanced cryogenic multi-Penning trap system. Our result = −2.7928473441(42)μN (where the number in parentheses represents the 68% confidence interval on the last digits of the value) improves the precision of the previous best measurement8 by a factor of approximately 350. The measured value is consistent with the proton magnetic moment9, μp = 2.792847350(9)μN, and is in agreement with CPT invariance. Consequently, this measurement constrains the magnitude of certain CPT-violating effects10 to below 1.8 × 10−24 gigaelectronvolts, and a possible splitting of the proton–antiproton magnetic moments by CPT-odd dimension-five interactions to below 6 × 10−12 Bohr magnetons11. |
id | oai-inspirehep.net-1631907 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2017 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | oai-inspirehep.net-16319072020-11-24T13:55:15Zdoi:10.1038/nature24048http://cds.cern.ch/record/2291601engSmorra, CSellner, SBorchert, M JHarrington, J AHiguchi, TNagahama, HTanaka, TMooser, ASchneider, GBlaum, KMatsuda, YOspelkaus, CQuint, WWalz, JYamazaki, YUlmer, SA parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic momentPhysics in GeneralPrecise comparisons of the fundamental properties of matter–antimatter conjugates provide sensitive tests of charge–parity–time (CPT) invariance1, which is an important symmetry that rests on basic assumptions of the standard model of particle physics. Experiments on mesons2, leptons3, 4 and baryons5, 6 have compared different properties of matter–antimatter conjugates with fractional uncertainties at the parts-per-billion level or better. One specific quantity, however, has so far only been known to a fractional uncertainty at the parts-per-million level7, 8: the magnetic moment of the antiproton, . The extraordinary difficulty in measuring with high precision is caused by its intrinsic smallness; for example, it is 660 times smaller than the magnetic moment of the positron3. Here we report a high-precision measurement of in units of the nuclear magneton μN with a fractional precision of 1.5 parts per billion (68% confidence level). We use a two-particle spectroscopy method in an advanced cryogenic multi-Penning trap system. Our result = −2.7928473441(42)μN (where the number in parentheses represents the 68% confidence interval on the last digits of the value) improves the precision of the previous best measurement8 by a factor of approximately 350. The measured value is consistent with the proton magnetic moment9, μp = 2.792847350(9)μN, and is in agreement with CPT invariance. Consequently, this measurement constrains the magnitude of certain CPT-violating effects10 to below 1.8 × 10−24 gigaelectronvolts, and a possible splitting of the proton–antiproton magnetic moments by CPT-odd dimension-five interactions to below 6 × 10−12 Bohr magnetons11.oai:inspirehep.net:16319072017 |
spellingShingle | Physics in General Smorra, C Sellner, S Borchert, M J Harrington, J A Higuchi, T Nagahama, H Tanaka, T Mooser, A Schneider, G Blaum, K Matsuda, Y Ospelkaus, C Quint, W Walz, J Yamazaki, Y Ulmer, S A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment |
title | A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment |
title_full | A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment |
title_fullStr | A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment |
title_full_unstemmed | A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment |
title_short | A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment |
title_sort | parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment |
topic | Physics in General |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature24048 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2291601 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smorrac apartsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT sellners apartsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT borchertmj apartsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT harringtonja apartsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT higuchit apartsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT nagahamah apartsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT tanakat apartsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT moosera apartsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT schneiderg apartsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT blaumk apartsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT matsuday apartsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT ospelkausc apartsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT quintw apartsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT walzj apartsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT yamazakiy apartsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT ulmers apartsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT smorrac partsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT sellners partsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT borchertmj partsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT harringtonja partsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT higuchit partsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT nagahamah partsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT tanakat partsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT moosera partsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT schneiderg partsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT blaumk partsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT matsuday partsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT ospelkausc partsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT quintw partsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT walzj partsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT yamazakiy partsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment AT ulmers partsperbillionmeasurementoftheantiprotonmagneticmoment |