Cargando…

Relative Biological Effectiveness of Antiprotons the AD-4/ACE Experiment

Particle beam cancer therapy was introduced by Robert R. Wilson in 1947 based on the advantageous depth dose profile of a particle beam in human-like targets (water) compared to X-rays or electrons. Heavy charged particles have a finite range in water and present a distinct peak of dose deposition a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holzscheiter, Michael, Alsner, Jan, Bassler, Niels, Knudsen, Helge, Sellner, Stefan, Sørensen, Brita Singers
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.7566/JPSCP.18.011039
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2310934
_version_ 1780957946206748672
author Holzscheiter, Michael
Alsner, Jan
Bassler, Niels
Knudsen, Helge
Sellner, Stefan
Sørensen, Brita Singers
author_facet Holzscheiter, Michael
Alsner, Jan
Bassler, Niels
Knudsen, Helge
Sellner, Stefan
Sørensen, Brita Singers
author_sort Holzscheiter, Michael
collection CERN
description Particle beam cancer therapy was introduced by Robert R. Wilson in 1947 based on the advantageous depth dose profile of a particle beam in human-like targets (water) compared to X-rays or electrons. Heavy charged particles have a finite range in water and present a distinct peak of dose deposition at the end of their range. Early work in Berkeley concentrated on multiple ion species and revealed strong differences in effectiveness in terminating cancer cells for different ions and along the particle track. This can be expressed in terms of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE). The search for the “ideal particle” was started and early on, exotic particles like pions and antiprotons entered the field. Enhancement in physical dose deposition near the end of range for antiprotons compared to protons was shown experimentally but no data for the relative biological effectiveness were available. In 2004 the AD-4/ACE collaboration set out to fill this gap. In a pilot experiment using a 50 MeV antiproton beam we measured the ratio of cell termination between the Bragg peak and the entrance region (plateau), which can be expressed by the biological effective dose ratio (BEDR), showing an increase of cell killing capability of antiprotons compared to protons at identical energy by a factor of 4. This promising result led to a continuation of the AD-4/ACE campaign using higher energy antiprotons and adding absolute dosimetry capabilities, allowing the extraction of the RBE of antiprotons at any depth along the antiproton beam.
id oai-inspirehep.net-1642154
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2017
record_format invenio
spelling oai-inspirehep.net-16421542019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.7566/JPSCP.18.011039http://cds.cern.ch/record/2310934engHolzscheiter, MichaelAlsner, JanBassler, NielsKnudsen, HelgeSellner, StefanSørensen, Brita SingersRelative Biological Effectiveness of Antiprotons the AD-4/ACE ExperimentOtherParticle beam cancer therapy was introduced by Robert R. Wilson in 1947 based on the advantageous depth dose profile of a particle beam in human-like targets (water) compared to X-rays or electrons. Heavy charged particles have a finite range in water and present a distinct peak of dose deposition at the end of their range. Early work in Berkeley concentrated on multiple ion species and revealed strong differences in effectiveness in terminating cancer cells for different ions and along the particle track. This can be expressed in terms of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE). The search for the “ideal particle” was started and early on, exotic particles like pions and antiprotons entered the field. Enhancement in physical dose deposition near the end of range for antiprotons compared to protons was shown experimentally but no data for the relative biological effectiveness were available. In 2004 the AD-4/ACE collaboration set out to fill this gap. In a pilot experiment using a 50 MeV antiproton beam we measured the ratio of cell termination between the Bragg peak and the entrance region (plateau), which can be expressed by the biological effective dose ratio (BEDR), showing an increase of cell killing capability of antiprotons compared to protons at identical energy by a factor of 4. This promising result led to a continuation of the AD-4/ACE campaign using higher energy antiprotons and adding absolute dosimetry capabilities, allowing the extraction of the RBE of antiprotons at any depth along the antiproton beam.oai:inspirehep.net:16421542017
spellingShingle Other
Holzscheiter, Michael
Alsner, Jan
Bassler, Niels
Knudsen, Helge
Sellner, Stefan
Sørensen, Brita Singers
Relative Biological Effectiveness of Antiprotons the AD-4/ACE Experiment
title Relative Biological Effectiveness of Antiprotons the AD-4/ACE Experiment
title_full Relative Biological Effectiveness of Antiprotons the AD-4/ACE Experiment
title_fullStr Relative Biological Effectiveness of Antiprotons the AD-4/ACE Experiment
title_full_unstemmed Relative Biological Effectiveness of Antiprotons the AD-4/ACE Experiment
title_short Relative Biological Effectiveness of Antiprotons the AD-4/ACE Experiment
title_sort relative biological effectiveness of antiprotons the ad-4/ace experiment
topic Other
url https://dx.doi.org/10.7566/JPSCP.18.011039
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2310934
work_keys_str_mv AT holzscheitermichael relativebiologicaleffectivenessofantiprotonsthead4aceexperiment
AT alsnerjan relativebiologicaleffectivenessofantiprotonsthead4aceexperiment
AT basslerniels relativebiologicaleffectivenessofantiprotonsthead4aceexperiment
AT knudsenhelge relativebiologicaleffectivenessofantiprotonsthead4aceexperiment
AT sellnerstefan relativebiologicaleffectivenessofantiprotonsthead4aceexperiment
AT sørensenbritasingers relativebiologicaleffectivenessofantiprotonsthead4aceexperiment