Cargando…
Squeezing with colliding beams
There are two main reasons why performing the squeeze with colliding beams may be beneficial for the operation of the LHC after LS1. First, this procedure allows to achieve luminosity leveling in a robust way on a large range, pros and cons of this technique are being compared to lumi-nosity levelin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
CERN
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://cds.cern.ch/record/2302720 |
_version_ | 1780957301885108224 |
---|---|
author | Buffat, X Herr, W Lamont, M Pieloni, T Redaelli, S Wenninger, J |
author_facet | Buffat, X Herr, W Lamont, M Pieloni, T Redaelli, S Wenninger, J |
author_sort | Buffat, X |
collection | CERN |
description | There are two main reasons why performing the squeeze with colliding beams may
be beneficial for the operation of the LHC after LS1. First, this procedure
allows to achieve luminosity leveling in a robust way on a large range, pros and
cons of this technique are being compared to lumi-nosity leveling with a
transverse offset at the interaction point. Secondly, recent observations
suggest that the beams brightness is already limited by impedance driven
instabil-ities. It may be greatly beneficial for the beam stability to profit
from the tune spread provided by head-on beam-beam collision, which is
significantly larger than the one provided by the octupoles. The two options
have different consequences on the operation of the LHC, both are being
discussed based on 2012 operational experience and MD results. |
id | oai-inspirehep.net-1650695 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | CERN |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | oai-inspirehep.net-16506952019-09-30T06:29:59Zhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2302720engBuffat, XHerr, WLamont, MPieloni, TRedaelli, SWenninger, JSqueezing with colliding beamsAccelerators and Storage RingsThere are two main reasons why performing the squeeze with colliding beams may be beneficial for the operation of the LHC after LS1. First, this procedure allows to achieve luminosity leveling in a robust way on a large range, pros and cons of this technique are being compared to lumi-nosity leveling with a transverse offset at the interaction point. Secondly, recent observations suggest that the beams brightness is already limited by impedance driven instabil-ities. It may be greatly beneficial for the beam stability to profit from the tune spread provided by head-on beam-beam collision, which is significantly larger than the one provided by the octupoles. The two options have different consequences on the operation of the LHC, both are being discussed based on 2012 operational experience and MD results.CERNoai:inspirehep.net:16506952012 |
spellingShingle | Accelerators and Storage Rings Buffat, X Herr, W Lamont, M Pieloni, T Redaelli, S Wenninger, J Squeezing with colliding beams |
title | Squeezing with colliding beams |
title_full | Squeezing with colliding beams |
title_fullStr | Squeezing with colliding beams |
title_full_unstemmed | Squeezing with colliding beams |
title_short | Squeezing with colliding beams |
title_sort | squeezing with colliding beams |
topic | Accelerators and Storage Rings |
url | http://cds.cern.ch/record/2302720 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buffatx squeezingwithcollidingbeams AT herrw squeezingwithcollidingbeams AT lamontm squeezingwithcollidingbeams AT pielonit squeezingwithcollidingbeams AT redaellis squeezingwithcollidingbeams AT wenningerj squeezingwithcollidingbeams |