Cargando…
A search for the Standard Model Higgs boson produced in association with a pair of top quarks and decaying to a pair of bottom quarks
A search for the Standard Model Higgs boson produced in association with a pair of top-quarks and decaying to a pair of b-quarks ($t\bar{t} H(H\to b\bar{b}$)) is presented. The analysis uses 20.3 $fb^{−1}$ of data taken from proton-proton collision at centre of mass energy $\sqrt{s}$= 8 TeV, collect...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://cds.cern.ch/record/2318397 |
Sumario: | A search for the Standard Model Higgs boson produced in association with a pair of top-quarks and
decaying to a pair of b-quarks ($t\bar{t} H(H\to b\bar{b}$)) is presented. The analysis uses 20.3 $fb^{−1}$ of data taken
from proton-proton collision at centre of mass energy $\sqrt{s}$= 8 TeV, collected using the ATLAS
detector. This thesis focuses on the search for dilepton events where the two leptons can be either
an electron or a muon.
A study is presented comparing different techniques (“pairing methods”) for correctly identifying
which two b-jets in an event come from the decay of the Higgs boson. The best alternative
to the default pairing method used in the Run I analysis, improves the matching efficiency by more
than 25%. Individual neural networks are then trained to separate signal from background using
input variables based on each pairing method.
No significant improvement on the separation obtained with the Run I neural network is
achieved when using an alternative pairing method. The neural network performances are then
compared with an alternative multi-variate classifier using the same pairing method, namely boosted
decision trees. Comparing the two classifiers shows the best performance of the neural network
is better than the best performance for the boosted decision tree. Similarly, for each individual
pairing method, the neural network outperforms the boosted decision tree trained using the same
input variables and pairing method.
The inclusion of additional input variables, which provide information on the topology of the
event, improves the performance of the alternative classifier (boosted decision tree) by on average
≈ 5%. The best performing BDT, goes from a separation power of 0.1915 ± 0.003 (stat.) to
0.2012±0.003 (stat.). The best performing NN goes from a separation power of 0.1925±0.002
(stat.) to 0.1946 ± 0.003 (stat.). For the best performing classifier, the alternative classifier is
seen to improve on the separation achieved by the neural network by 3.4% of the neural networks
separation (1.5% stat. error on neural network separation).
A calibration of the MV1 b-tagging algorithm using 14.34 $fb^{−1}$ of data collected at 8 TeV using
the ATLAS detector is also presented. It is performed on a sample of jets selected from t¯t dilepton
events, which ensures a very high-purity, inclusive sample of b-jets. b-tagging scale factors are
then derived from two separate samples of jets: those which contain a muon and those which do not. A ratio of the scale factors derived using each jet category is used as a measure of the
potential bias. No significant bias is seen in either of the jet pT bins, however due to the size of the
uncertainties, the measurement is not sensitive to a bias of less than ≈ 8%. |
---|