Cargando…

Characterization of the 1S–2S transition in antihydrogen

In 1928, Dirac published an equation that combined quantum mechanics and special relativity. Negative-energy solutions to this equation, rather than being unphysical as initially thought, represented a class of hitherto unobserved and unimagined particles—antimatter. The existence of particles of an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmadi, M, Alves, B X R, Baker, C J, Bertsche, W, Capra, A, Carruth, C, Cesar, C L, Charlton, M, Cohen, S, Collister, R, Eriksson, S, Evans, A, Evetts, N, Fajans, J, Friesen, T, Fujiwara, M C, Gill, D R, Hangst, J S, Hardy, W N, Hayden, M E, Isaac, C A, Johnson, M A, Jones, J M, Jones, S A, Jonsell, S, Khramov, A, Knapp, P, Kurchaninov, L, Madsen, N, Maxwell, D, McKenna, J T K, Menary, S, Momose, T, Munich, J J, Olchanski, K, Olin, A, Pusa, P, Rasmussen, C Ø, Robicheaux, F, Sacramento, R L, Sameed, M, Sarid, E, Silveira, D M, Stutter, G, So, C, Tharp, T D, Thompson, R I, van der Werf, D P, Wurtele, J S
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0017-2
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2668348
_version_ 1780962210397290496
author Ahmadi, M
Alves, B X R
Baker, C J
Bertsche, W
Capra, A
Carruth, C
Cesar, C L
Charlton, M
Cohen, S
Collister, R
Eriksson, S
Evans, A
Evetts, N
Fajans, J
Friesen, T
Fujiwara, M C
Gill, D R
Hangst, J S
Hardy, W N
Hayden, M E
Isaac, C A
Johnson, M A
Jones, J M
Jones, S A
Jonsell, S
Khramov, A
Knapp, P
Kurchaninov, L
Madsen, N
Maxwell, D
McKenna, J T K
Menary, S
Momose, T
Munich, J J
Olchanski, K
Olin, A
Pusa, P
Rasmussen, C Ø
Robicheaux, F
Sacramento, R L
Sameed, M
Sarid, E
Silveira, D M
Stutter, G
So, C
Tharp, T D
Thompson, R I
van der Werf, D P
Wurtele, J S
author_facet Ahmadi, M
Alves, B X R
Baker, C J
Bertsche, W
Capra, A
Carruth, C
Cesar, C L
Charlton, M
Cohen, S
Collister, R
Eriksson, S
Evans, A
Evetts, N
Fajans, J
Friesen, T
Fujiwara, M C
Gill, D R
Hangst, J S
Hardy, W N
Hayden, M E
Isaac, C A
Johnson, M A
Jones, J M
Jones, S A
Jonsell, S
Khramov, A
Knapp, P
Kurchaninov, L
Madsen, N
Maxwell, D
McKenna, J T K
Menary, S
Momose, T
Munich, J J
Olchanski, K
Olin, A
Pusa, P
Rasmussen, C Ø
Robicheaux, F
Sacramento, R L
Sameed, M
Sarid, E
Silveira, D M
Stutter, G
So, C
Tharp, T D
Thompson, R I
van der Werf, D P
Wurtele, J S
author_sort Ahmadi, M
collection CERN
description In 1928, Dirac published an equation that combined quantum mechanics and special relativity. Negative-energy solutions to this equation, rather than being unphysical as initially thought, represented a class of hitherto unobserved and unimagined particles—antimatter. The existence of particles of antimatter was confirmed with the discovery of the positron (or anti-electron) by Anderson in 1932, but it is still unknown why matter, rather than antimatter, survived after the Big Bang. As a result, experimental studies of antimatter, including tests of fundamental symmetries such as charge–parity and charge–parity–time, and searches for evidence of primordial antimatter, such as antihelium nuclei, have high priority in contemporary physics research. The fundamental role of the hydrogen atom in the evolution of the Universe and in the historical development of our understanding of quantum physics makes its antimatter counterpart — the antihydrogen atom — of particular interest. Current standard-model physics requires that hydrogen and antihydrogen have the same energy levels and spectral lines. The laser-driven 1S–2S transition was recently observed in antihydrogen. Here we characterize one of the hyperfine components of this transition using magnetically trapped atoms of antihydrogen and compare it to model calculations for hydrogen in our apparatus. We find that the shape of the spectral line agrees very well with that expected for hydrogen and that the resonance frequency agrees with that in hydrogen to about 5 kilohertz out of $2.5  \times 10^{15}$ hertz. This is consistent with charge–parity–time invariance at a relative precision of $2  \times  10^{−12}$ — two orders of magnitude more precise than the previous determination — corresponding to an absolute energy sensitivity of $2  \times  10^{−20}$ GeV.
id oai-inspirehep.net-1665808
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2018
record_format invenio
spelling oai-inspirehep.net-16658082019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.1038/s41586-018-0017-2http://cds.cern.ch/record/2668348engAhmadi, MAlves, B X RBaker, C JBertsche, WCapra, ACarruth, CCesar, C LCharlton, MCohen, SCollister, REriksson, SEvans, AEvetts, NFajans, JFriesen, TFujiwara, M CGill, D RHangst, J SHardy, W NHayden, M EIsaac, C AJohnson, M AJones, J MJones, S AJonsell, SKhramov, AKnapp, PKurchaninov, LMadsen, NMaxwell, DMcKenna, J T KMenary, SMomose, TMunich, J JOlchanski, KOlin, APusa, PRasmussen, C ØRobicheaux, FSacramento, R LSameed, MSarid, ESilveira, D MStutter, GSo, CTharp, T DThompson, R Ivan der Werf, D PWurtele, J SCharacterization of the 1S–2S transition in antihydrogenParticle Physics - ExperimentIn 1928, Dirac published an equation that combined quantum mechanics and special relativity. Negative-energy solutions to this equation, rather than being unphysical as initially thought, represented a class of hitherto unobserved and unimagined particles—antimatter. The existence of particles of antimatter was confirmed with the discovery of the positron (or anti-electron) by Anderson in 1932, but it is still unknown why matter, rather than antimatter, survived after the Big Bang. As a result, experimental studies of antimatter, including tests of fundamental symmetries such as charge–parity and charge–parity–time, and searches for evidence of primordial antimatter, such as antihelium nuclei, have high priority in contemporary physics research. The fundamental role of the hydrogen atom in the evolution of the Universe and in the historical development of our understanding of quantum physics makes its antimatter counterpart — the antihydrogen atom — of particular interest. Current standard-model physics requires that hydrogen and antihydrogen have the same energy levels and spectral lines. The laser-driven 1S–2S transition was recently observed in antihydrogen. Here we characterize one of the hyperfine components of this transition using magnetically trapped atoms of antihydrogen and compare it to model calculations for hydrogen in our apparatus. We find that the shape of the spectral line agrees very well with that expected for hydrogen and that the resonance frequency agrees with that in hydrogen to about 5 kilohertz out of $2.5  \times 10^{15}$ hertz. This is consistent with charge–parity–time invariance at a relative precision of $2  \times  10^{−12}$ — two orders of magnitude more precise than the previous determination — corresponding to an absolute energy sensitivity of $2  \times  10^{−20}$ GeV.In 1928, Dirac published an equation 1 that combined quantum mechanics and special relativity. Negative-energy solutions to this equation, rather than being unphysical as initially thought, represented a class of hitherto unobserved and unimagined particles—antimatter. The existence of particles of antimatter was confirmed with the discovery of the positron 2 (or anti-electron) by Anderson in 1932, but it is still unknown why matter, rather than antimatter, survived after the Big Bang. As a result, experimental studies of antimatter 3$^{–}$7 , including tests of fundamental symmetries such as charge–parity and charge–parity–time, and searches for evidence of primordial antimatter, such as antihelium nuclei, have high priority in contemporary physics research. The fundamental role of the hydrogen atom in the evolution of the Universe and in the historical development of our understanding of quantum physics makes its antimatter counterpart—the antihydrogen atom—of particular interest. Current standard-model physics requires that hydrogen and antihydrogen have the same energy levels and spectral lines. The laser-driven 1S–2S transition was recently observed 8 in antihydrogen. Here we characterize one of the hyperfine components of this transition using magnetically trapped atoms of antihydrogen and compare it to model calculations for hydrogen in our apparatus. We find that the shape of the spectral line agrees very well with that expected for hydrogen and that the resonance frequency agrees with that in hydrogen to about 5 kilohertz out of 2.5 × 10$^{15}$ hertz. This is consistent with charge–parity–time invariance at a relative precision of 2 × 10$^{−12}$—two orders of magnitude more precise than the previous determination 8 —corresponding to an absolute energy sensitivity of 2 × 10$^{−20}$ GeV.oai:inspirehep.net:16658082018
spellingShingle Particle Physics - Experiment
Ahmadi, M
Alves, B X R
Baker, C J
Bertsche, W
Capra, A
Carruth, C
Cesar, C L
Charlton, M
Cohen, S
Collister, R
Eriksson, S
Evans, A
Evetts, N
Fajans, J
Friesen, T
Fujiwara, M C
Gill, D R
Hangst, J S
Hardy, W N
Hayden, M E
Isaac, C A
Johnson, M A
Jones, J M
Jones, S A
Jonsell, S
Khramov, A
Knapp, P
Kurchaninov, L
Madsen, N
Maxwell, D
McKenna, J T K
Menary, S
Momose, T
Munich, J J
Olchanski, K
Olin, A
Pusa, P
Rasmussen, C Ø
Robicheaux, F
Sacramento, R L
Sameed, M
Sarid, E
Silveira, D M
Stutter, G
So, C
Tharp, T D
Thompson, R I
van der Werf, D P
Wurtele, J S
Characterization of the 1S–2S transition in antihydrogen
title Characterization of the 1S–2S transition in antihydrogen
title_full Characterization of the 1S–2S transition in antihydrogen
title_fullStr Characterization of the 1S–2S transition in antihydrogen
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of the 1S–2S transition in antihydrogen
title_short Characterization of the 1S–2S transition in antihydrogen
title_sort characterization of the 1s–2s transition in antihydrogen
topic Particle Physics - Experiment
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0017-2
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2668348
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadim characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT alvesbxr characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT bakercj characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT bertschew characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT capraa characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT carruthc characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT cesarcl characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT charltonm characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT cohens characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT collisterr characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT erikssons characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT evansa characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT evettsn characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT fajansj characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT friesent characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT fujiwaramc characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT gilldr characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT hangstjs characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT hardywn characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT haydenme characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT isaacca characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT johnsonma characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT jonesjm characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT jonessa characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT jonsells characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT khramova characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT knappp characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT kurchaninovl characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT madsenn characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT maxwelld characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT mckennajtk characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT menarys characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT momoset characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT munichjj characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT olchanskik characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT olina characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT pusap characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT rasmussencø characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT robicheauxf characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT sacramentorl characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT sameedm characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT saride characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT silveiradm characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT stutterg characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT soc characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT tharptd characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT thompsonri characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT vanderwerfdp characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen
AT wurtelejs characterizationofthe1s2stransitioninantihydrogen