Cargando…

A comparison of ambient dose equivalent meters and dose calculations at constant flight conditions

Ambient dose-equivalent results from an in-flight comparison between different tissue-equivalent proportional counters and silicon diode spectrometers from seven European institutes are presented and compared with calculations using the EPCARD computer program. The measurements were performed on 40...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lillhök, J, Beck, P, Bottollier-Depois, J F, Latocha, M, Lindborg, L, Roos, H, Roth, J, Schraube, H, Spurny, F, Stehno, G, Trompier, F, Wissmann, F
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.12.011
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2633101
_version_ 1780959625664790528
author Lillhök, J
Beck, P
Bottollier-Depois, J F
Latocha, M
Lindborg, L
Roos, H
Roth, J
Schraube, H
Spurny, F
Stehno, G
Trompier, F
Wissmann, F
author_facet Lillhök, J
Beck, P
Bottollier-Depois, J F
Latocha, M
Lindborg, L
Roos, H
Roth, J
Schraube, H
Spurny, F
Stehno, G
Trompier, F
Wissmann, F
author_sort Lillhök, J
collection CERN
description Ambient dose-equivalent results from an in-flight comparison between different tissue-equivalent proportional counters and silicon diode spectrometers from seven European institutes are presented and compared with calculations using the EPCARD computer program. The measurements were performed on 40 000 and 32 000 ft in narrow target areas at latitudes N57° and N42° . Keeping the altitude and geographic position almost constant provided unique conditions for comparisons. The different measuring systems as well as the calculations are in remarkably good agreement, with an average standard deviation in the ambient dose equivalent between 6% and 21%. The ratio between calculated and measured ambient dose-equivalent rates varies between 0.91 and 1.09, with an average of $1.00 \pm 0.08\ (1s)$. Nevertheless some systematic differences in the experimentally determined ambient dose equivalent and its low-LET and high-LET components are noticed and discussed. It is concluded that the standard deviation between different instruments can through optimization and harmonization of the calibration procedures be reduced by up to a factor of two.
id oai-inspirehep.net-1669920
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2007
record_format invenio
spelling oai-inspirehep.net-16699202019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.12.011http://cds.cern.ch/record/2633101engLillhök, JBeck, PBottollier-Depois, J FLatocha, MLindborg, LRoos, HRoth, JSchraube, HSpurny, FStehno, GTrompier, FWissmann, FA comparison of ambient dose equivalent meters and dose calculations at constant flight conditionsDetectors and Experimental TechniquesAmbient dose-equivalent results from an in-flight comparison between different tissue-equivalent proportional counters and silicon diode spectrometers from seven European institutes are presented and compared with calculations using the EPCARD computer program. The measurements were performed on 40 000 and 32 000 ft in narrow target areas at latitudes N57° and N42° . Keeping the altitude and geographic position almost constant provided unique conditions for comparisons. The different measuring systems as well as the calculations are in remarkably good agreement, with an average standard deviation in the ambient dose equivalent between 6% and 21%. The ratio between calculated and measured ambient dose-equivalent rates varies between 0.91 and 1.09, with an average of $1.00 \pm 0.08\ (1s)$. Nevertheless some systematic differences in the experimentally determined ambient dose equivalent and its low-LET and high-LET components are noticed and discussed. It is concluded that the standard deviation between different instruments can through optimization and harmonization of the calibration procedures be reduced by up to a factor of two.oai:inspirehep.net:16699202007
spellingShingle Detectors and Experimental Techniques
Lillhök, J
Beck, P
Bottollier-Depois, J F
Latocha, M
Lindborg, L
Roos, H
Roth, J
Schraube, H
Spurny, F
Stehno, G
Trompier, F
Wissmann, F
A comparison of ambient dose equivalent meters and dose calculations at constant flight conditions
title A comparison of ambient dose equivalent meters and dose calculations at constant flight conditions
title_full A comparison of ambient dose equivalent meters and dose calculations at constant flight conditions
title_fullStr A comparison of ambient dose equivalent meters and dose calculations at constant flight conditions
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of ambient dose equivalent meters and dose calculations at constant flight conditions
title_short A comparison of ambient dose equivalent meters and dose calculations at constant flight conditions
title_sort comparison of ambient dose equivalent meters and dose calculations at constant flight conditions
topic Detectors and Experimental Techniques
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.12.011
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2633101
work_keys_str_mv AT lillhokj acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT beckp acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT bottollierdepoisjf acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT latocham acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT lindborgl acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT roosh acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT rothj acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT schraubeh acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT spurnyf acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT stehnog acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT trompierf acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT wissmannf acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT lillhokj comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT beckp comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT bottollierdepoisjf comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT latocham comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT lindborgl comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT roosh comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT rothj comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT schraubeh comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT spurnyf comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT stehnog comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT trompierf comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions
AT wissmannf comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions