Cargando…
A comparison of ambient dose equivalent meters and dose calculations at constant flight conditions
Ambient dose-equivalent results from an in-flight comparison between different tissue-equivalent proportional counters and silicon diode spectrometers from seven European institutes are presented and compared with calculations using the EPCARD computer program. The measurements were performed on 40...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.12.011 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2633101 |
_version_ | 1780959625664790528 |
---|---|
author | Lillhök, J Beck, P Bottollier-Depois, J F Latocha, M Lindborg, L Roos, H Roth, J Schraube, H Spurny, F Stehno, G Trompier, F Wissmann, F |
author_facet | Lillhök, J Beck, P Bottollier-Depois, J F Latocha, M Lindborg, L Roos, H Roth, J Schraube, H Spurny, F Stehno, G Trompier, F Wissmann, F |
author_sort | Lillhök, J |
collection | CERN |
description | Ambient dose-equivalent results from an in-flight comparison between different tissue-equivalent proportional counters and silicon diode spectrometers from seven European institutes are presented and compared with calculations using the EPCARD computer program. The measurements were performed on 40 000 and 32 000 ft in narrow target areas at latitudes N57° and N42° . Keeping the altitude and geographic position almost constant provided unique conditions for comparisons. The different measuring systems as well as the calculations are in remarkably good agreement, with an average standard deviation in the ambient dose equivalent between 6% and 21%. The ratio between calculated and measured ambient dose-equivalent rates varies between 0.91 and 1.09, with an average of $1.00 \pm 0.08\ (1s)$. Nevertheless some systematic differences in the experimentally determined ambient dose equivalent and its low-LET and high-LET components are noticed and discussed. It is concluded that the standard deviation between different instruments can through optimization and harmonization of the calibration procedures be reduced by up to a factor of two. |
id | oai-inspirehep.net-1669920 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2007 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | oai-inspirehep.net-16699202019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.12.011http://cds.cern.ch/record/2633101engLillhök, JBeck, PBottollier-Depois, J FLatocha, MLindborg, LRoos, HRoth, JSchraube, HSpurny, FStehno, GTrompier, FWissmann, FA comparison of ambient dose equivalent meters and dose calculations at constant flight conditionsDetectors and Experimental TechniquesAmbient dose-equivalent results from an in-flight comparison between different tissue-equivalent proportional counters and silicon diode spectrometers from seven European institutes are presented and compared with calculations using the EPCARD computer program. The measurements were performed on 40 000 and 32 000 ft in narrow target areas at latitudes N57° and N42° . Keeping the altitude and geographic position almost constant provided unique conditions for comparisons. The different measuring systems as well as the calculations are in remarkably good agreement, with an average standard deviation in the ambient dose equivalent between 6% and 21%. The ratio between calculated and measured ambient dose-equivalent rates varies between 0.91 and 1.09, with an average of $1.00 \pm 0.08\ (1s)$. Nevertheless some systematic differences in the experimentally determined ambient dose equivalent and its low-LET and high-LET components are noticed and discussed. It is concluded that the standard deviation between different instruments can through optimization and harmonization of the calibration procedures be reduced by up to a factor of two.oai:inspirehep.net:16699202007 |
spellingShingle | Detectors and Experimental Techniques Lillhök, J Beck, P Bottollier-Depois, J F Latocha, M Lindborg, L Roos, H Roth, J Schraube, H Spurny, F Stehno, G Trompier, F Wissmann, F A comparison of ambient dose equivalent meters and dose calculations at constant flight conditions |
title | A comparison of ambient dose equivalent meters and dose calculations at constant flight conditions |
title_full | A comparison of ambient dose equivalent meters and dose calculations at constant flight conditions |
title_fullStr | A comparison of ambient dose equivalent meters and dose calculations at constant flight conditions |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of ambient dose equivalent meters and dose calculations at constant flight conditions |
title_short | A comparison of ambient dose equivalent meters and dose calculations at constant flight conditions |
title_sort | comparison of ambient dose equivalent meters and dose calculations at constant flight conditions |
topic | Detectors and Experimental Techniques |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.12.011 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2633101 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lillhokj acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT beckp acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT bottollierdepoisjf acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT latocham acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT lindborgl acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT roosh acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT rothj acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT schraubeh acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT spurnyf acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT stehnog acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT trompierf acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT wissmannf acomparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT lillhokj comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT beckp comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT bottollierdepoisjf comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT latocham comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT lindborgl comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT roosh comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT rothj comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT schraubeh comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT spurnyf comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT stehnog comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT trompierf comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions AT wissmannf comparisonofambientdoseequivalentmetersanddosecalculationsatconstantflightconditions |