Cargando…
Optimization of the Cryogenic Current Comparator (CCC) for Beam Intensity Measurement
Triggered by the need for current measurement in the nA range for slow extracted beams and for the beams in the storage rings at FAIR and CERN, the idea of the CCC as a current transformer has been revitalized during the last ten years. Compared to the first prototype, developed at GSI in the 90s, t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IBIC2017-TH2AB3 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2661459 |
_version_ | 1780961564067627008 |
---|---|
author | Sieber, Thomas De Gersem, Herbert Fernandes, Miguel Golm, Jessica Jones, Robert Kowina, Piotr Kurian, Febin Marsic, Nicolas Neubert, Ralf Reeg, Hansjörg Schmelz, Matthias Schmidl, Frank Schwickert, Marcus Seidel, Paul Søby, Lars Stöhlker, Thomas Stolz, Ronny Tan, Jocelyn Tranquille, Gerard Tympel, Volker Welsch, Carsten Zakosarenko, Vyacheslav |
author_facet | Sieber, Thomas De Gersem, Herbert Fernandes, Miguel Golm, Jessica Jones, Robert Kowina, Piotr Kurian, Febin Marsic, Nicolas Neubert, Ralf Reeg, Hansjörg Schmelz, Matthias Schmidl, Frank Schwickert, Marcus Seidel, Paul Søby, Lars Stöhlker, Thomas Stolz, Ronny Tan, Jocelyn Tranquille, Gerard Tympel, Volker Welsch, Carsten Zakosarenko, Vyacheslav |
author_sort | Sieber, Thomas |
collection | CERN |
description | Triggered by the need for current measurement in the nA range for slow extracted beams and for the beams in the storage rings at FAIR and CERN, the idea of the CCC as a current transformer has been revitalized during the last ten years. Compared to the first prototype, developed at GSI in the 90s, the second generation of CCCs is based on the possibility of detailed simulation of superconducting magnetic shielding properties, new nano-crystalline materials for the magnetic ring-cores, and on superior commercially available SQUID systems. In 2014, nA resolution measurements at 2 kHz bandwidth demonstrated the possibility of spill analysis at slow extracted beams from GSI SIS18. In the following year, the first stand-alone CCC system, including a cryostat with separate He liquefier, started operation in the CERN AD. Although the existing systems show an outstanding current resolution, their cost efficiency and robustness, as well as noise and vibration sensitivity can still be improved, which is subject of ongoing research. In this contribution recent results of our CCC tests are shown and future developments are discussed. |
id | oai-inspirehep.net-1673557 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2018 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | oai-inspirehep.net-16735572019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.18429/JACoW-IBIC2017-TH2AB3http://cds.cern.ch/record/2661459engSieber, ThomasDe Gersem, HerbertFernandes, MiguelGolm, JessicaJones, RobertKowina, PiotrKurian, FebinMarsic, NicolasNeubert, RalfReeg, HansjörgSchmelz, MatthiasSchmidl, FrankSchwickert, MarcusSeidel, PaulSøby, LarsStöhlker, ThomasStolz, RonnyTan, JocelynTranquille, GerardTympel, VolkerWelsch, CarstenZakosarenko, VyacheslavOptimization of the Cryogenic Current Comparator (CCC) for Beam Intensity MeasurementAccelerators and Storage RingsTriggered by the need for current measurement in the nA range for slow extracted beams and for the beams in the storage rings at FAIR and CERN, the idea of the CCC as a current transformer has been revitalized during the last ten years. Compared to the first prototype, developed at GSI in the 90s, the second generation of CCCs is based on the possibility of detailed simulation of superconducting magnetic shielding properties, new nano-crystalline materials for the magnetic ring-cores, and on superior commercially available SQUID systems. In 2014, nA resolution measurements at 2 kHz bandwidth demonstrated the possibility of spill analysis at slow extracted beams from GSI SIS18. In the following year, the first stand-alone CCC system, including a cryostat with separate He liquefier, started operation in the CERN AD. Although the existing systems show an outstanding current resolution, their cost efficiency and robustness, as well as noise and vibration sensitivity can still be improved, which is subject of ongoing research. In this contribution recent results of our CCC tests are shown and future developments are discussed.oai:inspirehep.net:16735572018 |
spellingShingle | Accelerators and Storage Rings Sieber, Thomas De Gersem, Herbert Fernandes, Miguel Golm, Jessica Jones, Robert Kowina, Piotr Kurian, Febin Marsic, Nicolas Neubert, Ralf Reeg, Hansjörg Schmelz, Matthias Schmidl, Frank Schwickert, Marcus Seidel, Paul Søby, Lars Stöhlker, Thomas Stolz, Ronny Tan, Jocelyn Tranquille, Gerard Tympel, Volker Welsch, Carsten Zakosarenko, Vyacheslav Optimization of the Cryogenic Current Comparator (CCC) for Beam Intensity Measurement |
title | Optimization of the Cryogenic Current Comparator (CCC) for Beam Intensity Measurement |
title_full | Optimization of the Cryogenic Current Comparator (CCC) for Beam Intensity Measurement |
title_fullStr | Optimization of the Cryogenic Current Comparator (CCC) for Beam Intensity Measurement |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimization of the Cryogenic Current Comparator (CCC) for Beam Intensity Measurement |
title_short | Optimization of the Cryogenic Current Comparator (CCC) for Beam Intensity Measurement |
title_sort | optimization of the cryogenic current comparator (ccc) for beam intensity measurement |
topic | Accelerators and Storage Rings |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IBIC2017-TH2AB3 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2661459 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sieberthomas optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT degersemherbert optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT fernandesmiguel optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT golmjessica optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT jonesrobert optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT kowinapiotr optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT kurianfebin optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT marsicnicolas optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT neubertralf optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT reeghansjorg optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT schmelzmatthias optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT schmidlfrank optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT schwickertmarcus optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT seidelpaul optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT søbylars optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT stohlkerthomas optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT stolzronny optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT tanjocelyn optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT tranquillegerard optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT tympelvolker optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT welschcarsten optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement AT zakosarenkovyacheslav optimizationofthecryogeniccurrentcomparatorcccforbeamintensitymeasurement |