Cargando…
Availability Studies Comparing Drive Beam and Klystron Options for the Compact Linear Collider
The initial proposal for the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is based on a two beam-scheme to accelerate the main colliding beams. For low collision energies, the main beam could also be accelerated by powering the accelerating structures with klystrons instead of the two-beam scheme. This paper stud...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2018-WEPAF076 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2667537 |
_version_ | 1780962138073858048 |
---|---|
author | Rey Orozco, Odei Doebert, Steffen Jonker, Michael |
author_facet | Rey Orozco, Odei Doebert, Steffen Jonker, Michael |
author_sort | Rey Orozco, Odei |
collection | CERN |
description | The initial proposal for the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is based on a two beam-scheme to accelerate the main colliding beams. For low collision energies, the main beam could also be accelerated by powering the accelerating structures with klystrons instead of the two-beam scheme. This paper studies the feasibility of this new alternative in terms of machine availability. An implemented bottom-up availability model considers the components failure modes to estimate the overall availability of the system. The model is defined within a Common Input Format scheme and the AvailSim3 software package is used for availability simulations. This paper gives an overview of the systems affecting the beam powering availability and makes recommendations for availability improvements. |
id | oai-inspirehep.net-1690594 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2018 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | oai-inspirehep.net-16905942019-09-30T06:29:59Zdoi:10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2018-WEPAF076http://cds.cern.ch/record/2667537engRey Orozco, OdeiDoebert, SteffenJonker, MichaelAvailability Studies Comparing Drive Beam and Klystron Options for the Compact Linear ColliderAccelerators and Storage RingsThe initial proposal for the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is based on a two beam-scheme to accelerate the main colliding beams. For low collision energies, the main beam could also be accelerated by powering the accelerating structures with klystrons instead of the two-beam scheme. This paper studies the feasibility of this new alternative in terms of machine availability. An implemented bottom-up availability model considers the components failure modes to estimate the overall availability of the system. The model is defined within a Common Input Format scheme and the AvailSim3 software package is used for availability simulations. This paper gives an overview of the systems affecting the beam powering availability and makes recommendations for availability improvements.oai:inspirehep.net:16905942018 |
spellingShingle | Accelerators and Storage Rings Rey Orozco, Odei Doebert, Steffen Jonker, Michael Availability Studies Comparing Drive Beam and Klystron Options for the Compact Linear Collider |
title | Availability Studies Comparing Drive Beam and Klystron Options for the Compact Linear Collider |
title_full | Availability Studies Comparing Drive Beam and Klystron Options for the Compact Linear Collider |
title_fullStr | Availability Studies Comparing Drive Beam and Klystron Options for the Compact Linear Collider |
title_full_unstemmed | Availability Studies Comparing Drive Beam and Klystron Options for the Compact Linear Collider |
title_short | Availability Studies Comparing Drive Beam and Klystron Options for the Compact Linear Collider |
title_sort | availability studies comparing drive beam and klystron options for the compact linear collider |
topic | Accelerators and Storage Rings |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2018-WEPAF076 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2667537 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reyorozcoodei availabilitystudiescomparingdrivebeamandklystronoptionsforthecompactlinearcollider AT doebertsteffen availabilitystudiescomparingdrivebeamandklystronoptionsforthecompactlinearcollider AT jonkermichael availabilitystudiescomparingdrivebeamandklystronoptionsforthecompactlinearcollider |