Cargando…
Validation of energy deposition simulations for proton and heavy ion losses in the CERN Large Hadron Collider
Monte Carlo shower simulations are essential for understanding and predicting the consequences of beam losses in high-energy proton and ion colliders. Shower simulations are routinely used at CERN for estimating the beam-induced energy deposition, radiation damage, and radioactivity in the Large Had...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.22.071003 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2688989 |
_version_ | 1780963713277231104 |
---|---|
author | Lechner, A Auchmann, B Baer, T Bahamonde Castro, C Bruce, R Cerutti, F Esposito, L S Ferrari, A Jowett, J M Mereghetti, A Pietropaolo, F Redaelli, S Salvachua, B Sapinski, M Schaumann, M Shetty, N V Vlachoudis, V Skordis, E |
author_facet | Lechner, A Auchmann, B Baer, T Bahamonde Castro, C Bruce, R Cerutti, F Esposito, L S Ferrari, A Jowett, J M Mereghetti, A Pietropaolo, F Redaelli, S Salvachua, B Sapinski, M Schaumann, M Shetty, N V Vlachoudis, V Skordis, E |
author_sort | Lechner, A |
collection | CERN |
description | Monte Carlo shower simulations are essential for understanding and predicting the consequences of beam losses in high-energy proton and ion colliders. Shower simulations are routinely used at CERN for estimating the beam-induced energy deposition, radiation damage, and radioactivity in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Comparing these shower simulations against beam loss measurements is an important prerequisite for assessing the predictive ability of model calculations. This paper validates fluka simulation predictions of beam loss monitor (BLM) signals against BLM measurements from proton fills at 3.5 and 4 TeV and $^{208}$Pb$^{82+}$ ion fills at 1.38A TeV. The paper addresses typical loss scenarios and loss mechanisms encountered in LHC operation, including proton collisions with dust particles liberated into the beams, halo impact on collimators in the betatron cleaning insertion, proton-proton collisions in the interaction points, and dispersive losses due to bound-free pair production in heavy ion collisions. Model predictions and measured signals generally match within a few tens of percent, although systematic differences were found to be as high as a factor of 3 for some regions and source terms. |
id | oai-inspirehep.net-1743934 |
institution | Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear |
language | eng |
publishDate | 2019 |
record_format | invenio |
spelling | oai-inspirehep.net-17439342022-08-10T12:26:53Zdoi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.22.071003http://cds.cern.ch/record/2688989engLechner, AAuchmann, BBaer, TBahamonde Castro, CBruce, RCerutti, FEsposito, L SFerrari, AJowett, J MMereghetti, APietropaolo, FRedaelli, SSalvachua, BSapinski, MSchaumann, MShetty, N VVlachoudis, VSkordis, EValidation of energy deposition simulations for proton and heavy ion losses in the CERN Large Hadron ColliderAccelerators and Storage RingsMonte Carlo shower simulations are essential for understanding and predicting the consequences of beam losses in high-energy proton and ion colliders. Shower simulations are routinely used at CERN for estimating the beam-induced energy deposition, radiation damage, and radioactivity in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Comparing these shower simulations against beam loss measurements is an important prerequisite for assessing the predictive ability of model calculations. This paper validates fluka simulation predictions of beam loss monitor (BLM) signals against BLM measurements from proton fills at 3.5 and 4 TeV and $^{208}$Pb$^{82+}$ ion fills at 1.38A TeV. The paper addresses typical loss scenarios and loss mechanisms encountered in LHC operation, including proton collisions with dust particles liberated into the beams, halo impact on collimators in the betatron cleaning insertion, proton-proton collisions in the interaction points, and dispersive losses due to bound-free pair production in heavy ion collisions. Model predictions and measured signals generally match within a few tens of percent, although systematic differences were found to be as high as a factor of 3 for some regions and source terms.oai:inspirehep.net:17439342019 |
spellingShingle | Accelerators and Storage Rings Lechner, A Auchmann, B Baer, T Bahamonde Castro, C Bruce, R Cerutti, F Esposito, L S Ferrari, A Jowett, J M Mereghetti, A Pietropaolo, F Redaelli, S Salvachua, B Sapinski, M Schaumann, M Shetty, N V Vlachoudis, V Skordis, E Validation of energy deposition simulations for proton and heavy ion losses in the CERN Large Hadron Collider |
title | Validation of energy deposition simulations for proton and heavy ion losses in the CERN Large Hadron Collider |
title_full | Validation of energy deposition simulations for proton and heavy ion losses in the CERN Large Hadron Collider |
title_fullStr | Validation of energy deposition simulations for proton and heavy ion losses in the CERN Large Hadron Collider |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of energy deposition simulations for proton and heavy ion losses in the CERN Large Hadron Collider |
title_short | Validation of energy deposition simulations for proton and heavy ion losses in the CERN Large Hadron Collider |
title_sort | validation of energy deposition simulations for proton and heavy ion losses in the cern large hadron collider |
topic | Accelerators and Storage Rings |
url | https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.22.071003 http://cds.cern.ch/record/2688989 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lechnera validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider AT auchmannb validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider AT baert validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider AT bahamondecastroc validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider AT brucer validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider AT ceruttif validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider AT espositols validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider AT ferraria validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider AT jowettjm validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider AT mereghettia validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider AT pietropaolof validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider AT redaellis validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider AT salvachuab validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider AT sapinskim validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider AT schaumannm validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider AT shettynv validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider AT vlachoudisv validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider AT skordise validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider |