Cargando…

Validation of energy deposition simulations for proton and heavy ion losses in the CERN Large Hadron Collider

Monte Carlo shower simulations are essential for understanding and predicting the consequences of beam losses in high-energy proton and ion colliders. Shower simulations are routinely used at CERN for estimating the beam-induced energy deposition, radiation damage, and radioactivity in the Large Had...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lechner, A, Auchmann, B, Baer, T, Bahamonde Castro, C, Bruce, R, Cerutti, F, Esposito, L S, Ferrari, A, Jowett, J M, Mereghetti, A, Pietropaolo, F, Redaelli, S, Salvachua, B, Sapinski, M, Schaumann, M, Shetty, N V, Vlachoudis, V, Skordis, E
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.22.071003
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2688989
_version_ 1780963713277231104
author Lechner, A
Auchmann, B
Baer, T
Bahamonde Castro, C
Bruce, R
Cerutti, F
Esposito, L S
Ferrari, A
Jowett, J M
Mereghetti, A
Pietropaolo, F
Redaelli, S
Salvachua, B
Sapinski, M
Schaumann, M
Shetty, N V
Vlachoudis, V
Skordis, E
author_facet Lechner, A
Auchmann, B
Baer, T
Bahamonde Castro, C
Bruce, R
Cerutti, F
Esposito, L S
Ferrari, A
Jowett, J M
Mereghetti, A
Pietropaolo, F
Redaelli, S
Salvachua, B
Sapinski, M
Schaumann, M
Shetty, N V
Vlachoudis, V
Skordis, E
author_sort Lechner, A
collection CERN
description Monte Carlo shower simulations are essential for understanding and predicting the consequences of beam losses in high-energy proton and ion colliders. Shower simulations are routinely used at CERN for estimating the beam-induced energy deposition, radiation damage, and radioactivity in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Comparing these shower simulations against beam loss measurements is an important prerequisite for assessing the predictive ability of model calculations. This paper validates fluka simulation predictions of beam loss monitor (BLM) signals against BLM measurements from proton fills at 3.5 and 4 TeV and $^{208}$Pb$^{82+}$ ion fills at 1.38A  TeV. The paper addresses typical loss scenarios and loss mechanisms encountered in LHC operation, including proton collisions with dust particles liberated into the beams, halo impact on collimators in the betatron cleaning insertion, proton-proton collisions in the interaction points, and dispersive losses due to bound-free pair production in heavy ion collisions. Model predictions and measured signals generally match within a few tens of percent, although systematic differences were found to be as high as a factor of 3 for some regions and source terms.
id oai-inspirehep.net-1743934
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2019
record_format invenio
spelling oai-inspirehep.net-17439342022-08-10T12:26:53Zdoi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.22.071003http://cds.cern.ch/record/2688989engLechner, AAuchmann, BBaer, TBahamonde Castro, CBruce, RCerutti, FEsposito, L SFerrari, AJowett, J MMereghetti, APietropaolo, FRedaelli, SSalvachua, BSapinski, MSchaumann, MShetty, N VVlachoudis, VSkordis, EValidation of energy deposition simulations for proton and heavy ion losses in the CERN Large Hadron ColliderAccelerators and Storage RingsMonte Carlo shower simulations are essential for understanding and predicting the consequences of beam losses in high-energy proton and ion colliders. Shower simulations are routinely used at CERN for estimating the beam-induced energy deposition, radiation damage, and radioactivity in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). Comparing these shower simulations against beam loss measurements is an important prerequisite for assessing the predictive ability of model calculations. This paper validates fluka simulation predictions of beam loss monitor (BLM) signals against BLM measurements from proton fills at 3.5 and 4 TeV and $^{208}$Pb$^{82+}$ ion fills at 1.38A  TeV. The paper addresses typical loss scenarios and loss mechanisms encountered in LHC operation, including proton collisions with dust particles liberated into the beams, halo impact on collimators in the betatron cleaning insertion, proton-proton collisions in the interaction points, and dispersive losses due to bound-free pair production in heavy ion collisions. Model predictions and measured signals generally match within a few tens of percent, although systematic differences were found to be as high as a factor of 3 for some regions and source terms.oai:inspirehep.net:17439342019
spellingShingle Accelerators and Storage Rings
Lechner, A
Auchmann, B
Baer, T
Bahamonde Castro, C
Bruce, R
Cerutti, F
Esposito, L S
Ferrari, A
Jowett, J M
Mereghetti, A
Pietropaolo, F
Redaelli, S
Salvachua, B
Sapinski, M
Schaumann, M
Shetty, N V
Vlachoudis, V
Skordis, E
Validation of energy deposition simulations for proton and heavy ion losses in the CERN Large Hadron Collider
title Validation of energy deposition simulations for proton and heavy ion losses in the CERN Large Hadron Collider
title_full Validation of energy deposition simulations for proton and heavy ion losses in the CERN Large Hadron Collider
title_fullStr Validation of energy deposition simulations for proton and heavy ion losses in the CERN Large Hadron Collider
title_full_unstemmed Validation of energy deposition simulations for proton and heavy ion losses in the CERN Large Hadron Collider
title_short Validation of energy deposition simulations for proton and heavy ion losses in the CERN Large Hadron Collider
title_sort validation of energy deposition simulations for proton and heavy ion losses in the cern large hadron collider
topic Accelerators and Storage Rings
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.22.071003
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2688989
work_keys_str_mv AT lechnera validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider
AT auchmannb validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider
AT baert validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider
AT bahamondecastroc validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider
AT brucer validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider
AT ceruttif validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider
AT espositols validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider
AT ferraria validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider
AT jowettjm validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider
AT mereghettia validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider
AT pietropaolof validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider
AT redaellis validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider
AT salvachuab validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider
AT sapinskim validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider
AT schaumannm validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider
AT shettynv validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider
AT vlachoudisv validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider
AT skordise validationofenergydepositionsimulationsforprotonandheavyionlossesinthecernlargehadroncollider