Cargando…

Monolithic CMOS sensors for sub-nanosecond timing

In the ATTRACT project FASTPIX we investigate monolithic pixel sensors with small collection electrodes in CMOS technologies for fast signal collection and precise timing in the sub-nanosecond range. Deep submicron CMOS technologies allow tiny, sub-femtofarad collection electrodes, and large signal-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kugathasan, Thanushan, Ando, Taeko, Dannheim, Dominik, Etoh, Takeharu Goji, Munker, Magdalena, Pernegger, Heinz, Rivetti, Angelo, Shimonomura, Kazuhiro, Snoeys, Walter
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020.164461
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2728013
_version_ 1780966455209099264
author Kugathasan, Thanushan
Ando, Taeko
Dannheim, Dominik
Etoh, Takeharu Goji
Munker, Magdalena
Pernegger, Heinz
Rivetti, Angelo
Shimonomura, Kazuhiro
Snoeys, Walter
author_facet Kugathasan, Thanushan
Ando, Taeko
Dannheim, Dominik
Etoh, Takeharu Goji
Munker, Magdalena
Pernegger, Heinz
Rivetti, Angelo
Shimonomura, Kazuhiro
Snoeys, Walter
author_sort Kugathasan, Thanushan
collection CERN
description In the ATTRACT project FASTPIX we investigate monolithic pixel sensors with small collection electrodes in CMOS technologies for fast signal collection and precise timing in the sub-nanosecond range. Deep submicron CMOS technologies allow tiny, sub-femtofarad collection electrodes, and large signal-to-noise ratios, essential for very precise timing. However, complex in-pixel circuits require some area, and one ofthe key limitations for precise timing is the longer drift time of signal charge generated near the pixel borders.Laying out the collection electrodes on a hexagonal grid and reducing the pixel pitch minimize the maximumdistance from the pixel border to the collection electrode. The electric field optimized with TCAD simulationspulls the signal charge away from the pixel border towards the collection electrode as fast as possible. Thisalso reduces charge sharing and maximizes the seed pixel signal hence reducing time-walk effects. Here thehexagonal geometry also contributes by limiting charge sharing at the pixel corners to only three pixels insteadof four. We reach pixel pitches down to about 8.7 μmbetween collection electrodes in this 180 nm technologyby placing only a minimum amount of circuitry in the pixel and the rest at the matrix periphery. Consumingseveral tens of micro-ampere per pixel from a 1.8 V supply offers a time jitter of only a few tens of picoseconds.This allows detailed characterization of the sensor timing performance in a prototype chip with several minimatrices of 64 pixels each with amplifier, comparator and digital readout and 4 additional pixels with analogbuffers. The aim is to prove sensor concepts before moving to a much finer line width technology and fullyintegrate the readout within the pixel at lower power consumption.
id oai-inspirehep.net-1811048
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2020
record_format invenio
spelling oai-inspirehep.net-18110482020-08-14T19:26:00Zdoi:10.1016/j.nima.2020.164461http://cds.cern.ch/record/2728013engKugathasan, ThanushanAndo, TaekoDannheim, DominikEtoh, Takeharu GojiMunker, MagdalenaPernegger, HeinzRivetti, AngeloShimonomura, KazuhiroSnoeys, WalterMonolithic CMOS sensors for sub-nanosecond timingDetectors and Experimental TechniquesIn the ATTRACT project FASTPIX we investigate monolithic pixel sensors with small collection electrodes in CMOS technologies for fast signal collection and precise timing in the sub-nanosecond range. Deep submicron CMOS technologies allow tiny, sub-femtofarad collection electrodes, and large signal-to-noise ratios, essential for very precise timing. However, complex in-pixel circuits require some area, and one ofthe key limitations for precise timing is the longer drift time of signal charge generated near the pixel borders.Laying out the collection electrodes on a hexagonal grid and reducing the pixel pitch minimize the maximumdistance from the pixel border to the collection electrode. The electric field optimized with TCAD simulationspulls the signal charge away from the pixel border towards the collection electrode as fast as possible. Thisalso reduces charge sharing and maximizes the seed pixel signal hence reducing time-walk effects. Here thehexagonal geometry also contributes by limiting charge sharing at the pixel corners to only three pixels insteadof four. We reach pixel pitches down to about 8.7 μmbetween collection electrodes in this 180 nm technologyby placing only a minimum amount of circuitry in the pixel and the rest at the matrix periphery. Consumingseveral tens of micro-ampere per pixel from a 1.8 V supply offers a time jitter of only a few tens of picoseconds.This allows detailed characterization of the sensor timing performance in a prototype chip with several minimatrices of 64 pixels each with amplifier, comparator and digital readout and 4 additional pixels with analogbuffers. The aim is to prove sensor concepts before moving to a much finer line width technology and fullyintegrate the readout within the pixel at lower power consumption.oai:inspirehep.net:18110482020
spellingShingle Detectors and Experimental Techniques
Kugathasan, Thanushan
Ando, Taeko
Dannheim, Dominik
Etoh, Takeharu Goji
Munker, Magdalena
Pernegger, Heinz
Rivetti, Angelo
Shimonomura, Kazuhiro
Snoeys, Walter
Monolithic CMOS sensors for sub-nanosecond timing
title Monolithic CMOS sensors for sub-nanosecond timing
title_full Monolithic CMOS sensors for sub-nanosecond timing
title_fullStr Monolithic CMOS sensors for sub-nanosecond timing
title_full_unstemmed Monolithic CMOS sensors for sub-nanosecond timing
title_short Monolithic CMOS sensors for sub-nanosecond timing
title_sort monolithic cmos sensors for sub-nanosecond timing
topic Detectors and Experimental Techniques
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020.164461
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2728013
work_keys_str_mv AT kugathasanthanushan monolithiccmossensorsforsubnanosecondtiming
AT andotaeko monolithiccmossensorsforsubnanosecondtiming
AT dannheimdominik monolithiccmossensorsforsubnanosecondtiming
AT etohtakeharugoji monolithiccmossensorsforsubnanosecondtiming
AT munkermagdalena monolithiccmossensorsforsubnanosecondtiming
AT perneggerheinz monolithiccmossensorsforsubnanosecondtiming
AT rivettiangelo monolithiccmossensorsforsubnanosecondtiming
AT shimonomurakazuhiro monolithiccmossensorsforsubnanosecondtiming
AT snoeyswalter monolithiccmossensorsforsubnanosecondtiming