Cargando…

Improving depth-of-interaction resolution in pixellated PET detectors using neural networks

Parallax error is a common issue in high-resolution preclinical positron emission tomography (PET) scanners as well as in clinical scanners that have a long axial field of view (FOV), which increases estimation uncertainty of the annihilation position and therefore degrades the spatial resolution. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zatcepin, Artem, Pizzichemi, Marco, Polesel, Andrea, Paganoni, Marco, Auffray, Etiennette, Ziegler, Sibylle I, Omidvari, Negar
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2020
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab9efc
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2729450
_version_ 1780966460707831808
author Zatcepin, Artem
Pizzichemi, Marco
Polesel, Andrea
Paganoni, Marco
Auffray, Etiennette
Ziegler, Sibylle I
Omidvari, Negar
author_facet Zatcepin, Artem
Pizzichemi, Marco
Polesel, Andrea
Paganoni, Marco
Auffray, Etiennette
Ziegler, Sibylle I
Omidvari, Negar
author_sort Zatcepin, Artem
collection CERN
description Parallax error is a common issue in high-resolution preclinical positron emission tomography (PET) scanners as well as in clinical scanners that have a long axial field of view (FOV), which increases estimation uncertainty of the annihilation position and therefore degrades the spatial resolution. A way to address this issue is depth-of-interaction (DOI) estimation. In this work we propose two machine learning-based algorithms, a dense and a convolutional neural network (NN), as well as a multiple linear regression (MLR)-based method to estimate DOI in depolished PET detector arrays with single-sided readout. The algorithms were tested on an 8× 8 array of 1.53× 1.53× 15 mm3 crystals and a 4× 4 array of 3.1× 3.1× 15 mm3 crystals, both made of Ce:LYSO scintillators and coupled to a 4× 4 array of 3× 3 mm3 silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs). Using the conventional linear DOI estimation method resulted in an average DOI resolution of 3.76 mm and 3.51 mm FWHM for the 8× 8 and the 4× 4 arrays, respectively. Application of MLR outperformed the conventional method with average DOI resolutions of 3.25 mm and 3.33 mm FWHM, respectively. Using the machine learning approaches further improved the DOI resolution, to an average DOI resolution of 2.99 mm and 3.14 mm FWHM, respectively, and additionally improved the uniformity of the DOI resolution in both arrays. Lastly, preliminary results obtained by using only a section of the crystal array for training showed that the NN-based methods could be used to reduce the number of calibration steps required for each detector array.
id oai-inspirehep.net-1813917
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2020
record_format invenio
spelling oai-inspirehep.net-18139172020-09-02T20:56:08Zdoi:10.1088/1361-6560/ab9efchttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2729450engZatcepin, ArtemPizzichemi, MarcoPolesel, AndreaPaganoni, MarcoAuffray, EtiennetteZiegler, Sibylle IOmidvari, NegarImproving depth-of-interaction resolution in pixellated PET detectors using neural networksParallax error is a common issue in high-resolution preclinical positron emission tomography (PET) scanners as well as in clinical scanners that have a long axial field of view (FOV), which increases estimation uncertainty of the annihilation position and therefore degrades the spatial resolution. A way to address this issue is depth-of-interaction (DOI) estimation. In this work we propose two machine learning-based algorithms, a dense and a convolutional neural network (NN), as well as a multiple linear regression (MLR)-based method to estimate DOI in depolished PET detector arrays with single-sided readout. The algorithms were tested on an 8× 8 array of 1.53× 1.53× 15 mm3 crystals and a 4× 4 array of 3.1× 3.1× 15 mm3 crystals, both made of Ce:LYSO scintillators and coupled to a 4× 4 array of 3× 3 mm3 silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs). Using the conventional linear DOI estimation method resulted in an average DOI resolution of 3.76 mm and 3.51 mm FWHM for the 8× 8 and the 4× 4 arrays, respectively. Application of MLR outperformed the conventional method with average DOI resolutions of 3.25 mm and 3.33 mm FWHM, respectively. Using the machine learning approaches further improved the DOI resolution, to an average DOI resolution of 2.99 mm and 3.14 mm FWHM, respectively, and additionally improved the uniformity of the DOI resolution in both arrays. Lastly, preliminary results obtained by using only a section of the crystal array for training showed that the NN-based methods could be used to reduce the number of calibration steps required for each detector array.oai:inspirehep.net:18139172020
spellingShingle Zatcepin, Artem
Pizzichemi, Marco
Polesel, Andrea
Paganoni, Marco
Auffray, Etiennette
Ziegler, Sibylle I
Omidvari, Negar
Improving depth-of-interaction resolution in pixellated PET detectors using neural networks
title Improving depth-of-interaction resolution in pixellated PET detectors using neural networks
title_full Improving depth-of-interaction resolution in pixellated PET detectors using neural networks
title_fullStr Improving depth-of-interaction resolution in pixellated PET detectors using neural networks
title_full_unstemmed Improving depth-of-interaction resolution in pixellated PET detectors using neural networks
title_short Improving depth-of-interaction resolution in pixellated PET detectors using neural networks
title_sort improving depth-of-interaction resolution in pixellated pet detectors using neural networks
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab9efc
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2729450
work_keys_str_mv AT zatcepinartem improvingdepthofinteractionresolutioninpixellatedpetdetectorsusingneuralnetworks
AT pizzichemimarco improvingdepthofinteractionresolutioninpixellatedpetdetectorsusingneuralnetworks
AT poleselandrea improvingdepthofinteractionresolutioninpixellatedpetdetectorsusingneuralnetworks
AT paganonimarco improvingdepthofinteractionresolutioninpixellatedpetdetectorsusingneuralnetworks
AT auffrayetiennette improvingdepthofinteractionresolutioninpixellatedpetdetectorsusingneuralnetworks
AT zieglersibyllei improvingdepthofinteractionresolutioninpixellatedpetdetectorsusingneuralnetworks
AT omidvarinegar improvingdepthofinteractionresolutioninpixellatedpetdetectorsusingneuralnetworks