Cargando…

Activation experiment at the H4IRRAD facility: A comparison between experimental data, FLUKA and ActiWiz predictions after 15 days of cooling time

An experiment was carried out in June 2011 at the H4IRRAD facility, which allows to reproduce the radiation fields commonly encountered in the CERN Large Hadron Collider. The purpose of this study was to create a set of experimental activation data that can be used to benchmark Monte Carlo codes and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duchemin, Charlotte, La Torre, Francesco, Magistris, Matteo, Silari, Marco
Lenguaje:eng
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020.164717
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2743929
_version_ 1780968589852934144
author Duchemin, Charlotte
La Torre, Francesco
Magistris, Matteo
Silari, Marco
author_facet Duchemin, Charlotte
La Torre, Francesco
Magistris, Matteo
Silari, Marco
author_sort Duchemin, Charlotte
collection CERN
description An experiment was carried out in June 2011 at the H4IRRAD facility, which allows to reproduce the radiation fields commonly encountered in the CERN Large Hadron Collider. The purpose of this study was to create a set of experimental activation data that can be used to benchmark Monte Carlo codes and now the analytical ActiWiz software package, both extensively used by CERN’s Radiation Protection Group. The choice of actual specimens that have been used for the construction of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the LHC experiments has been made specifically in view of future upgrades or dismantling of CERN’s accelerators and experimental areas. Six samples of materials commonly used at CERN were irradiated by the secondary particles generated from the impact of a 280 GeV/c hadron beam on a 100 cm long copper target with the samples having been placed few centimetres below. This paper discusses first the experimental results obtained by γ -spectrometry measurements after 15 days of cooling time. Then, it discusses the FLUKA simulations performed in order to obtain the radionuclide inventories as well as the mixed particle fluence spectra in the samples. Third, it discusses the predictions by the ActiWiz software and compares them with the FLUKA results for the sake of a code comparison. Finally, the experimental and computational results are compared and discussed altogether.
id oai-inspirehep.net-1822380
institution Organización Europea para la Investigación Nuclear
language eng
publishDate 2021
record_format invenio
spelling oai-inspirehep.net-18223802020-11-10T19:24:12Zdoi:10.1016/j.nima.2020.164717http://cds.cern.ch/record/2743929engDuchemin, CharlotteLa Torre, FrancescoMagistris, MatteoSilari, MarcoActivation experiment at the H4IRRAD facility: A comparison between experimental data, FLUKA and ActiWiz predictions after 15 days of cooling timeDetectors and Experimental TechniquesAn experiment was carried out in June 2011 at the H4IRRAD facility, which allows to reproduce the radiation fields commonly encountered in the CERN Large Hadron Collider. The purpose of this study was to create a set of experimental activation data that can be used to benchmark Monte Carlo codes and now the analytical ActiWiz software package, both extensively used by CERN’s Radiation Protection Group. The choice of actual specimens that have been used for the construction of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the LHC experiments has been made specifically in view of future upgrades or dismantling of CERN’s accelerators and experimental areas. Six samples of materials commonly used at CERN were irradiated by the secondary particles generated from the impact of a 280 GeV/c hadron beam on a 100 cm long copper target with the samples having been placed few centimetres below. This paper discusses first the experimental results obtained by γ -spectrometry measurements after 15 days of cooling time. Then, it discusses the FLUKA simulations performed in order to obtain the radionuclide inventories as well as the mixed particle fluence spectra in the samples. Third, it discusses the predictions by the ActiWiz software and compares them with the FLUKA results for the sake of a code comparison. Finally, the experimental and computational results are compared and discussed altogether.oai:inspirehep.net:18223802021
spellingShingle Detectors and Experimental Techniques
Duchemin, Charlotte
La Torre, Francesco
Magistris, Matteo
Silari, Marco
Activation experiment at the H4IRRAD facility: A comparison between experimental data, FLUKA and ActiWiz predictions after 15 days of cooling time
title Activation experiment at the H4IRRAD facility: A comparison between experimental data, FLUKA and ActiWiz predictions after 15 days of cooling time
title_full Activation experiment at the H4IRRAD facility: A comparison between experimental data, FLUKA and ActiWiz predictions after 15 days of cooling time
title_fullStr Activation experiment at the H4IRRAD facility: A comparison between experimental data, FLUKA and ActiWiz predictions after 15 days of cooling time
title_full_unstemmed Activation experiment at the H4IRRAD facility: A comparison between experimental data, FLUKA and ActiWiz predictions after 15 days of cooling time
title_short Activation experiment at the H4IRRAD facility: A comparison between experimental data, FLUKA and ActiWiz predictions after 15 days of cooling time
title_sort activation experiment at the h4irrad facility: a comparison between experimental data, fluka and actiwiz predictions after 15 days of cooling time
topic Detectors and Experimental Techniques
url https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020.164717
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2743929
work_keys_str_mv AT duchemincharlotte activationexperimentattheh4irradfacilityacomparisonbetweenexperimentaldataflukaandactiwizpredictionsafter15daysofcoolingtime
AT latorrefrancesco activationexperimentattheh4irradfacilityacomparisonbetweenexperimentaldataflukaandactiwizpredictionsafter15daysofcoolingtime
AT magistrismatteo activationexperimentattheh4irradfacilityacomparisonbetweenexperimentaldataflukaandactiwizpredictionsafter15daysofcoolingtime
AT silarimarco activationexperimentattheh4irradfacilityacomparisonbetweenexperimentaldataflukaandactiwizpredictionsafter15daysofcoolingtime