Cargando…

Cost-benefit of trapping and population fluctuation of Rhynchophorus palmarum L. in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) genotypes

Introduction: Rhynchophorus palmarum L. is the most destructive pest in Cocos nucifera plantations in Mexico.Objective: To estimate the cost-benefit of collecting R. palmarum by trapping in two coconut genotypes and to determine the correlation of trapping with environmental factors.Materials and me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de la Mora-Castañeda, Jesús G., Chan-Cupul, Wilberth, Durán-Puga, Noé, González-Eguiarte, Diego R., Ruíz-Corral, José A., Muñoz-Urias, Alejandro
Formato: Online Artículo
Lenguaje:spa
Publicado: Universidad Autónoma Chapingo 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.chapingo.mx/forestales/article/view/r.rchscfa.2022.02.010
https://dx.doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2022.02.010
_version_ 1780770770168840192
author de la Mora-Castañeda, Jesús G.
Chan-Cupul, Wilberth
Durán-Puga, Noé
González-Eguiarte, Diego R.
Ruíz-Corral, José A.
Muñoz-Urias, Alejandro
author_facet de la Mora-Castañeda, Jesús G.
Chan-Cupul, Wilberth
Durán-Puga, Noé
González-Eguiarte, Diego R.
Ruíz-Corral, José A.
Muñoz-Urias, Alejandro
author_sort de la Mora-Castañeda, Jesús G.
collection Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente
description Introduction: Rhynchophorus palmarum L. is the most destructive pest in Cocos nucifera plantations in Mexico.Objective: To estimate the cost-benefit of collecting R. palmarum by trapping in two coconut genotypes and to determine the correlation of trapping with environmental factors.Materials and methods: R. palmarum insects were captured on the genotypes ‘Alto Pacífico ecotipo 2’ (AP) and ‘Enano-Verde de Brasil’ (EVB) for one year. Five types of traps were used (BT = bucket type, TCT = trash can type, GT = gallon type, CSAT = Colegio Superior de Agricultura Tropical, BT = bottle type). Trapping was counted weekly, and the cost-benefit of trapping was determined. Trapping was analyzed with quasi-Poisson distribution, deviancy analysis and least significant difference. Trapping correlation with climate variables was determined with the Spearman’s coefficient.Results and discussion: A total of 3414 insects were captured in AP. TCT and CSAT were the most effective (P < 0.014) with 40.3 % and 32.7 % of the total adults, respectively; they also had the best cost-benefit, 4.3 MXN and 5.5 MXN per insect, respectively. In EVB, 3.56 times more insects were captured (4799) compared to AP with a 29.6:6.4 ratio, using GT. In both orchards, the correlations of climate variables with trapping were weak (less than 50 %); relative humidity was the most highly correlated, but negative.Conclusions: The efficiency of traps and their cost-benefit will allow growers to determine which trap to use for mechanical and ethological (aggregation pheromone) control of R. palmarum.
format Online
Article
id oai_chapingo-forestales-_article-19
institution Universidad Autónoma Chapingo
language spa
publishDate 2022
publisher Universidad Autónoma Chapingo
record_format ojs
spelling oai_chapingo-forestales-_article-192023-08-28T16:31:37Z Cost-benefit of trapping and population fluctuation of Rhynchophorus palmarum L. in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) genotypes Costo-beneficio del trampeo y fluctuación poblacional de Rhynchophorus palmarum L. en genotipos de coco (Cocos nucifera L.) de la Mora-Castañeda, Jesús G. Chan-Cupul, Wilberth Durán-Puga, Noé González-Eguiarte, Diego R. Ruíz-Corral, José A. Muñoz-Urias, Alejandro picudo de la palma Alto Pacífico ecotipo 2 Enano Verde de Brasil captura de insectos control etológico palm weevil Alto Pacífico ecotipo 2 Enano-Verde de Brasil insect trapping biological pest control Introduction: Rhynchophorus palmarum L. is the most destructive pest in Cocos nucifera plantations in Mexico.Objective: To estimate the cost-benefit of collecting R. palmarum by trapping in two coconut genotypes and to determine the correlation of trapping with environmental factors.Materials and methods: R. palmarum insects were captured on the genotypes ‘Alto Pacífico ecotipo 2’ (AP) and ‘Enano-Verde de Brasil’ (EVB) for one year. Five types of traps were used (BT = bucket type, TCT = trash can type, GT = gallon type, CSAT = Colegio Superior de Agricultura Tropical, BT = bottle type). Trapping was counted weekly, and the cost-benefit of trapping was determined. Trapping was analyzed with quasi-Poisson distribution, deviancy analysis and least significant difference. Trapping correlation with climate variables was determined with the Spearman’s coefficient.Results and discussion: A total of 3414 insects were captured in AP. TCT and CSAT were the most effective (P < 0.014) with 40.3 % and 32.7 % of the total adults, respectively; they also had the best cost-benefit, 4.3 MXN and 5.5 MXN per insect, respectively. In EVB, 3.56 times more insects were captured (4799) compared to AP with a 29.6:6.4 ratio, using GT. In both orchards, the correlations of climate variables with trapping were weak (less than 50 %); relative humidity was the most highly correlated, but negative.Conclusions: The efficiency of traps and their cost-benefit will allow growers to determine which trap to use for mechanical and ethological (aggregation pheromone) control of R. palmarum. Introducción: Rhynchophorus palmarum L. es la plaga más devastadora en plantaciones de Cocos nucifera en México. Objetivo: Estimar el costo-beneficio de captura de R. palmarum mediante trampeo en dos genotipos de coco y determinar la correlación de captura con los factores ambientales. Materiales y métodos: Los insectos de R. palmarum se capturaron en los genotipos ‘Alto Pacífico ecotipo 2’ (AP) y ‘Enano-Verde de Brasil’ (EVB) durante un año. Se utilizaron cinco tipos de trampas (TC = tipo cubeta, TBB = tipo bote de basura, TG = tipo galón, CSAT = Colegio Superior de Agricultura Tropical, TB = tipo botella). La captura se contabilizó semanalmente y se determinó el costo-beneficio de trampeo. Las capturas se analizaron con distribución cuasi-Poisson, análisis de devianza y diferencia mínima significativa. La correlación de captura con las variables climáticas se determinó mediante coeficiente de Spearman.Resultados y discusión: En AP se capturaron 3414 insectos. La TBB y CSAT fueron las más efectivas (P < 0.014) con 40.3 % y 32.7 % del total de adultos, respectivamente; además tuvieron el mejor costo[1]beneficio, 4.3 MXN y 5.5 MXN por insecto respectivamente. En EVB se capturaron 3.56 veces más insectos (4799) que en AP con relación 29.6:6.4, utilizando TG. En ambas huertas, las correlaciones de las variables climáticas con la captura fueron débiles (menores de 50 %); la humedad relativa fue la de mayor correlación, pero negativa.Conclusiones: La efectividad de las trampas y su costo-beneficio permitirá a los productores determinar cuál trampa utilizar para el control mecánico y etológico (feromona de agregación) de R. palmarum Universidad Autónoma Chapingo 2022-08-31 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.chapingo.mx/forestales/article/view/r.rchscfa.2022.02.010 10.5154/r.rchscfa.2022.02.010 Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente; Vol. 28 No. 3 (2022): September-December; 447–463 Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente; Vol. 28 Núm. 3 (2022): septiembre-diciembre; 447–463 2007-4018 2007-3828 spa https://revistas.chapingo.mx/forestales/article/view/r.rchscfa.2022.02.010/r.rchscfa.2022.02.010 Derechos de autor 2022 Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle picudo de la palma
Alto Pacífico ecotipo 2
Enano Verde de Brasil
captura de insectos
control etológico
palm weevil
Alto Pacífico ecotipo 2
Enano-Verde de Brasil
insect trapping
biological pest control
de la Mora-Castañeda, Jesús G.
Chan-Cupul, Wilberth
Durán-Puga, Noé
González-Eguiarte, Diego R.
Ruíz-Corral, José A.
Muñoz-Urias, Alejandro
Cost-benefit of trapping and population fluctuation of Rhynchophorus palmarum L. in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) genotypes
title Cost-benefit of trapping and population fluctuation of Rhynchophorus palmarum L. in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) genotypes
title_alt Costo-beneficio del trampeo y fluctuación poblacional de Rhynchophorus palmarum L. en genotipos de coco (Cocos nucifera L.)
title_full Cost-benefit of trapping and population fluctuation of Rhynchophorus palmarum L. in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) genotypes
title_fullStr Cost-benefit of trapping and population fluctuation of Rhynchophorus palmarum L. in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) genotypes
title_full_unstemmed Cost-benefit of trapping and population fluctuation of Rhynchophorus palmarum L. in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) genotypes
title_short Cost-benefit of trapping and population fluctuation of Rhynchophorus palmarum L. in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) genotypes
title_sort cost-benefit of trapping and population fluctuation of rhynchophorus palmarum l. in coconut (cocos nucifera l.) genotypes
topic picudo de la palma
Alto Pacífico ecotipo 2
Enano Verde de Brasil
captura de insectos
control etológico
palm weevil
Alto Pacífico ecotipo 2
Enano-Verde de Brasil
insect trapping
biological pest control
topic_facet picudo de la palma
Alto Pacífico ecotipo 2
Enano Verde de Brasil
captura de insectos
control etológico
palm weevil
Alto Pacífico ecotipo 2
Enano-Verde de Brasil
insect trapping
biological pest control
url https://revistas.chapingo.mx/forestales/article/view/r.rchscfa.2022.02.010
https://dx.doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2022.02.010
work_keys_str_mv AT delamoracastanedajesusg costbenefitoftrappingandpopulationfluctuationofrhynchophoruspalmarumlincoconutcocosnuciferalgenotypes
AT chancupulwilberth costbenefitoftrappingandpopulationfluctuationofrhynchophoruspalmarumlincoconutcocosnuciferalgenotypes
AT duranpuganoe costbenefitoftrappingandpopulationfluctuationofrhynchophoruspalmarumlincoconutcocosnuciferalgenotypes
AT gonzalezeguiartediegor costbenefitoftrappingandpopulationfluctuationofrhynchophoruspalmarumlincoconutcocosnuciferalgenotypes
AT ruizcorraljosea costbenefitoftrappingandpopulationfluctuationofrhynchophoruspalmarumlincoconutcocosnuciferalgenotypes
AT munozuriasalejandro costbenefitoftrappingandpopulationfluctuationofrhynchophoruspalmarumlincoconutcocosnuciferalgenotypes
AT delamoracastanedajesusg costobeneficiodeltrampeoyfluctuacionpoblacionalderhynchophoruspalmarumlengenotiposdecocococosnuciferal
AT chancupulwilberth costobeneficiodeltrampeoyfluctuacionpoblacionalderhynchophoruspalmarumlengenotiposdecocococosnuciferal
AT duranpuganoe costobeneficiodeltrampeoyfluctuacionpoblacionalderhynchophoruspalmarumlengenotiposdecocococosnuciferal
AT gonzalezeguiartediegor costobeneficiodeltrampeoyfluctuacionpoblacionalderhynchophoruspalmarumlengenotiposdecocococosnuciferal
AT ruizcorraljosea costobeneficiodeltrampeoyfluctuacionpoblacionalderhynchophoruspalmarumlengenotiposdecocococosnuciferal
AT munozuriasalejandro costobeneficiodeltrampeoyfluctuacionpoblacionalderhynchophoruspalmarumlengenotiposdecocococosnuciferal