Cargando…
Forest ecosystem services in the tropics: an imperfect assessment of their contribution to welfare, and environmental policy implications
Introduction: The specific relation between ecosystem services (ES), land use systems productivity and welfare is complex and poorly understood.Objective: To analyze the relationship between natural capital and welfare in the Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU) sector...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo |
Lenguaje: | spa |
Publicado: |
Universidad Autónoma Chapingo
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.chapingo.mx/forestales/article/view/r.rchscfa.2020.04.025 https://dx.doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2020.04.025 |
_version_ | 1780770778441056256 |
---|---|
author | López-Ramírez, Martín A. |
author_facet | López-Ramírez, Martín A. |
author_sort | López-Ramírez, Martín A. |
collection | Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente |
description | Introduction: The specific relation between ecosystem services (ES), land use systems productivity and welfare is complex and poorly understood.Objective: To analyze the relationship between natural capital and welfare in the Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU) sector to assess Ecosystem Services contribution to agriculture, forestry and fishing value added (GDP [Gross Domestic Product]) and analyze policy implications.Materials and methods: Using land use allocation variables, forest transition model and land use GDP for 97 tropical countries, the production function of AFOLU sector was estimated using a linear regression model and a bootstrap method. The properties of the function were analyzed, and the optimal land allocation was calculated.Results and discussion: There is a direct contribution and an indirect contribution from forest ecosystems to GDP. The direct effect is manifested through the partial elasticity of forestland (P < 0.05). The indirect effect is reflected through the production scale (P < 0.05). Partial elasticity of agriculture is significantly higher than partial elasticity of forestland (P < 0.05) and production scale increases as forestland is depleted (P < 0.05). In addition, optimal land use indicates that 75 countries have forest superavit (13.2 Mkm 2 ) and 22 forest deficit (1.5 Mkm 2 ).Conclusions: Forest ecosystems in the AFOLU sector in the tropics produce ecosystem services for society. However, these contributions are dwarfed by agricultural land productivity. |
format | Online Article |
id | oai_chapingo-forestales-_article-320 |
institution | Universidad Autónoma Chapingo |
language | spa |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Universidad Autónoma Chapingo |
record_format | ojs |
spelling | oai_chapingo-forestales-_article-3202023-08-28T16:31:59Z Forest ecosystem services in the tropics: an imperfect assessment of their contribution to welfare, and environmental policy implications Servicios de los ecosistemas forestales en los trópicos: una evaluación imperfecta de su contribución al bienestar e implicaciones en la política ambiental López-Ramírez, Martín A. Agricultura climáticamente inteligente capital natural uso de suelo transición forestal método bootstrap Cien países tropicales, no incluidos en el anexo I de la UNFCCC, se incluyeron en este análisis. El uso óptimo de la tierra indica que 75 países tienen superávit forestal (13.2 Mkm 2 ). Las contribuciones de los servicios ecosistémicos se ven opacadas por la productividad agrícola. En general, la agricultura es más rentable que la silvicultura, lo que crea incentivos para deforestar. Climate-smart Agriculture Natural capital Land use Forest Transition Bootstrap method En general, la agricultura es más rentable que la silvicultura, lo que crea incentivos para deforestar. Optimal land use indicates that 75 countries have forest superavit (13.2 Mkm 2 ). Contributions from ecosystem services are dwarfed by agricultural land productivity. In general, agriculture is more profitable than forestry, which creates incentives to deforest. Introduction: The specific relation between ecosystem services (ES), land use systems productivity and welfare is complex and poorly understood.Objective: To analyze the relationship between natural capital and welfare in the Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU) sector to assess Ecosystem Services contribution to agriculture, forestry and fishing value added (GDP [Gross Domestic Product]) and analyze policy implications.Materials and methods: Using land use allocation variables, forest transition model and land use GDP for 97 tropical countries, the production function of AFOLU sector was estimated using a linear regression model and a bootstrap method. The properties of the function were analyzed, and the optimal land allocation was calculated.Results and discussion: There is a direct contribution and an indirect contribution from forest ecosystems to GDP. The direct effect is manifested through the partial elasticity of forestland (P < 0.05). The indirect effect is reflected through the production scale (P < 0.05). Partial elasticity of agriculture is significantly higher than partial elasticity of forestland (P < 0.05) and production scale increases as forestland is depleted (P < 0.05). In addition, optimal land use indicates that 75 countries have forest superavit (13.2 Mkm 2 ) and 22 forest deficit (1.5 Mkm 2 ).Conclusions: Forest ecosystems in the AFOLU sector in the tropics produce ecosystem services for society. However, these contributions are dwarfed by agricultural land productivity. Introducción: La relación específica entre servicios ecosistémicos (SE), productividad de los sistemas de uso del suelo y bienestar es compleja y poco conocida.Objetivo: Analizar la relación entre el capital natural y el bienestar en el sector de la Agricultura, Silvicultura y Otros Uso del Suelo (AFOLU), con el fin de evaluar la contribución de los SE al valor agregado (PIB [producto interno bruto]) de la agricultura, la silvicultura y la pesca, y sus implicaciones políticas.Materiales y métodos: A través de variables de asignación de uso de suelo, el modelo de transición forestal y el PIB de uso de la tierra de 97 países tropicales, la función de producción del sector AFOLU se estimó mediante un modelo de regresión lineal y un método bootstrap. Las propiedades de la función se analizaron y se calculó la asignación óptima de la tierra.Resultados y discusión: Existe una contribución directa e indirecta de los ecosistemas forestales al PIB. El efecto directo se manifiesta a través de la elasticidad parcial de las tierras forestales (P < 0.05), y el indirecto, a través de la escala de producción (P < 0.05). La elasticidad parcial de la agricultura es significativamente mayor que la de las tierras forestales (P < 0.05) y la escala de producción aumenta a medida que las tierras forestales se agotan (P < 0.05). El uso óptimo de la tierra indica que 75 países tienen superávit forestal (13.2 Mkm 2 ) y 22 tienen déficit forestal (1.5 Mkm 2 ).Conclusiones: Los ecosistemas forestales en el sector AFOLU en los trópicos producen servicios ecosistémicos para la sociedad; sin embargo, estas contribuciones se ven opacadas por la productividad de la tierra agrícola. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo 2020-12-21 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.chapingo.mx/forestales/article/view/r.rchscfa.2020.04.025 10.5154/r.rchscfa.2020.04.025 Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2021): January-April; 89-107 Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente; Vol. 27 Núm. 1 (2021): enero-abril; 89-107 2007-4018 2007-3828 spa https://revistas.chapingo.mx/forestales/article/view/r.rchscfa.2020.04.025/r.rchscfa.2020.04.025 Derechos de autor 2020 Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Agricultura climáticamente inteligente capital natural uso de suelo transición forestal método bootstrap Cien países tropicales, no incluidos en el anexo I de la UNFCCC, se incluyeron en este análisis. El uso óptimo de la tierra indica que 75 países tienen superávit forestal (13.2 Mkm 2 ). Las contribuciones de los servicios ecosistémicos se ven opacadas por la productividad agrícola. En general, la agricultura es más rentable que la silvicultura, lo que crea incentivos para deforestar. Climate-smart Agriculture Natural capital Land use Forest Transition Bootstrap method En general, la agricultura es más rentable que la silvicultura, lo que crea incentivos para deforestar. Optimal land use indicates that 75 countries have forest superavit (13.2 Mkm 2 ). Contributions from ecosystem services are dwarfed by agricultural land productivity. In general, agriculture is more profitable than forestry, which creates incentives to deforest. López-Ramírez, Martín A. Forest ecosystem services in the tropics: an imperfect assessment of their contribution to welfare, and environmental policy implications |
title | Forest ecosystem services in the tropics: an imperfect assessment of their contribution to welfare, and environmental policy implications |
title_alt | Servicios de los ecosistemas forestales en los trópicos: una evaluación imperfecta de su contribución al bienestar e implicaciones en la política ambiental |
title_full | Forest ecosystem services in the tropics: an imperfect assessment of their contribution to welfare, and environmental policy implications |
title_fullStr | Forest ecosystem services in the tropics: an imperfect assessment of their contribution to welfare, and environmental policy implications |
title_full_unstemmed | Forest ecosystem services in the tropics: an imperfect assessment of their contribution to welfare, and environmental policy implications |
title_short | Forest ecosystem services in the tropics: an imperfect assessment of their contribution to welfare, and environmental policy implications |
title_sort | forest ecosystem services in the tropics: an imperfect assessment of their contribution to welfare, and environmental policy implications |
topic | Agricultura climáticamente inteligente capital natural uso de suelo transición forestal método bootstrap Cien países tropicales, no incluidos en el anexo I de la UNFCCC, se incluyeron en este análisis. El uso óptimo de la tierra indica que 75 países tienen superávit forestal (13.2 Mkm 2 ). Las contribuciones de los servicios ecosistémicos se ven opacadas por la productividad agrícola. En general, la agricultura es más rentable que la silvicultura, lo que crea incentivos para deforestar. Climate-smart Agriculture Natural capital Land use Forest Transition Bootstrap method En general, la agricultura es más rentable que la silvicultura, lo que crea incentivos para deforestar. Optimal land use indicates that 75 countries have forest superavit (13.2 Mkm 2 ). Contributions from ecosystem services are dwarfed by agricultural land productivity. In general, agriculture is more profitable than forestry, which creates incentives to deforest. |
topic_facet | Agricultura climáticamente inteligente capital natural uso de suelo transición forestal método bootstrap Cien países tropicales, no incluidos en el anexo I de la UNFCCC, se incluyeron en este análisis. El uso óptimo de la tierra indica que 75 países tienen superávit forestal (13.2 Mkm 2 ). Las contribuciones de los servicios ecosistémicos se ven opacadas por la productividad agrícola. En general, la agricultura es más rentable que la silvicultura, lo que crea incentivos para deforestar. Climate-smart Agriculture Natural capital Land use Forest Transition Bootstrap method En general, la agricultura es más rentable que la silvicultura, lo que crea incentivos para deforestar. Optimal land use indicates that 75 countries have forest superavit (13.2 Mkm 2 ). Contributions from ecosystem services are dwarfed by agricultural land productivity. In general, agriculture is more profitable than forestry, which creates incentives to deforest. |
url | https://revistas.chapingo.mx/forestales/article/view/r.rchscfa.2020.04.025 https://dx.doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2020.04.025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lopezramirezmartina forestecosystemservicesinthetropicsanimperfectassessmentoftheircontributiontowelfareandenvironmentalpolicyimplications AT lopezramirezmartina serviciosdelosecosistemasforestalesenlostropicosunaevaluacionimperfectadesucontribucionalbienestareimplicacionesenlapoliticaambiental |