Cargando…
Assessment of journal standarization in the Index of the Mexican National Council of Science and Technology
RESULTS OF ASSESSMENT ON THE INDEX OF MEXICAN JOURNALS OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (CONACYT) IN RELATION TO THE PERCENTAGE OF STANDARDIZATION ARE SHOWN. EVALUATION CRITERIA WERE ELABORATED BY THE INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION WORK GROUP...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo |
Lenguaje: | spa |
Publicado: |
Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliotecológicas y de la Información
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://rev-ib.unam.mx/ib/index.php/ib/article/view/4093 https://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iibi.0187358xp.2006.40.4093 |
_version_ | 1780761150249500672 |
---|---|
author | RÍOS ORTEGA, JAIME |
author_facet | RÍOS ORTEGA, JAIME |
author_sort | RÍOS ORTEGA, JAIME |
collection | Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información |
description | RESULTS OF ASSESSMENT ON THE INDEX OF MEXICAN JOURNALS OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (CONACYT) IN RELATION TO THE PERCENTAGE OF STANDARDIZATION ARE SHOWN. EVALUATION CRITERIA WERE ELABORATED BY THE INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION WORK GROUP OF THE NATIONAL SPANISH COMMISSION OF UNESCO. RESULTS INDICATE THAT NONE OF THE 76 JOURNALS EVALUATED, REACHED MORE THAN 90% OF NORMALIZATION PERCENTAGE. THE NUMBER OF JOURNALS QUALIFIED AS VERY WELL STANDARDIZED WAS ONLY 7 (9%); WHILE 30 (39%) WERE ACCEPTABLE IN TERMS OF STANDARDIZATION, AND 25 (32%) WERE THOUGHT OF AS HAVING CONSIDERABLE DEFICIENCIES, AND 14 (20%) WERE FOUND NOT ACCEPTABLE IN THE SAME TERMS. BASED ON THE LAST TWO CIPHERS IT CAN BE APPRECIATED THAT PRACTICALLY HALF OF THE JOURNALS IN THE INDEX INCLUDE IMPORTANT FLAWS OF NORMALIZATION. ACCORDING TO THE MEDIA OBTAINED FOR EACH SECTION ASSESSED, THE ONE WITH THE LEAST AVERAGE WAS THE SECTION CALLED "SUMMARY OR CONTENT". IT IS IMPORTANT TO EMPHASIZE THAT IN ALL CASES THERE EXISTS SOME KIND OF STANDARDIZATION PROBLEM THAT CAN BE OVERCOME. |
format | Online Article |
id | oai_unam-bibliotecologica-article-4093 |
institution | Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
language | spa |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliotecológicas y de la Información |
record_format | ojs |
spelling | oai_unam-bibliotecologica-article-40932018-01-31T14:27:32Z Assessment of journal standarization in the Index of the Mexican National Council of Science and Technology Evaluación de normalización de las revistas contenidas en el Índice del Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de México RÍOS ORTEGA, JAIME ACADEMIC JOURNAL STANDARDIZATION SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL ASSESSMENT NORMALIZACIÓN DE REVISTAS ACADÉMICAS EVALUACIÓN DE REVISTAS CIENTÍFICAS RESULTS OF ASSESSMENT ON THE INDEX OF MEXICAN JOURNALS OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (CONACYT) IN RELATION TO THE PERCENTAGE OF STANDARDIZATION ARE SHOWN. EVALUATION CRITERIA WERE ELABORATED BY THE INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION WORK GROUP OF THE NATIONAL SPANISH COMMISSION OF UNESCO. RESULTS INDICATE THAT NONE OF THE 76 JOURNALS EVALUATED, REACHED MORE THAN 90% OF NORMALIZATION PERCENTAGE. THE NUMBER OF JOURNALS QUALIFIED AS VERY WELL STANDARDIZED WAS ONLY 7 (9%); WHILE 30 (39%) WERE ACCEPTABLE IN TERMS OF STANDARDIZATION, AND 25 (32%) WERE THOUGHT OF AS HAVING CONSIDERABLE DEFICIENCIES, AND 14 (20%) WERE FOUND NOT ACCEPTABLE IN THE SAME TERMS. BASED ON THE LAST TWO CIPHERS IT CAN BE APPRECIATED THAT PRACTICALLY HALF OF THE JOURNALS IN THE INDEX INCLUDE IMPORTANT FLAWS OF NORMALIZATION. ACCORDING TO THE MEDIA OBTAINED FOR EACH SECTION ASSESSED, THE ONE WITH THE LEAST AVERAGE WAS THE SECTION CALLED "SUMMARY OR CONTENT". IT IS IMPORTANT TO EMPHASIZE THAT IN ALL CASES THERE EXISTS SOME KIND OF STANDARDIZATION PROBLEM THAT CAN BE OVERCOME. SE PRESENTAN LOS RESULTADOS DE LA EVALUACIÓN PRACTICADA AL ÍNDICE DE REVISTAS MEXICANAS DE INVESTIGACIÓN CIENTÍFICA Y TECNOLÓGICA DEL CONSEJO NACIONAL DE CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGÍA (CONACYT), EN RELACIÓN CON EL PORCENTAJE DE NORMALIZACIÓN QUE MUESTRAN. LOS CRITERIOS EMPLEADOS SE TOMARON DE LAS DIRECTRICES ELABORADAS POR EL GRUPO DE TRABAJO DE INFORMACIÓN Y DOCUMENTACIÓN DE LA COMISIÓN NACIONAL DE ESPAÑA DE LA UNESCO. LOS RESULTADOS INDICAN QUE NINGUNA DE LAS 76 REVISTAS EVALUADAS ALCANZA MÁS DEL 90% DEL PORCENTAJE DE NORMALIZACIÓN. ES POCO SIGNIFICATIVO EL NÚMERO DE REVISTAS CALIFICADAS COMO MUY BIEN NORMALIZADAS YA QUE ÚNICAMENTE SON 7 (9%); 30 REVISTAS (39%) SON ACEPTABLES EN TÉRMINOS DE NORMALIZACIÓN; 25 DE ELLAS (32%), PRESENTAN DEFICIENCIAS DE NORMALIZACIÓN CONSIDERABLES, Y 14 (20%) NO SON ACEPTABLES. CON BASE EN LAS DOS ÚLTIMAS CIFRAS SE APRECIA QUE PRÁCTICAMENTE LA MITAD DE REVISTAS DEL ÍNDICE, TIENEN FALLAS IMPORTANTES DE NORMALIZACIÓN. DE ACUERDO CON LOS PROMEDIOS OBTENIDO POR CADA SECCIÓN EVALUADA DE LAS REVISTAS, LA SECCIÓN CON MENOR PROMEDIO FUE LA RELACIONADA CON "SUMARIO O CONTENIDO". IMPORTA DESTACAR QUE EN TODOS LOS CASOS EXISTE ALGÚN TIPO DE PROBLEMA DE NORMALIZACIÓN QUE ES POSIBLE SUPERAR. Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliotecológicas y de la Información 2006-01-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html http://rev-ib.unam.mx/ib/index.php/ib/article/view/4093 10.22201/iibi.0187358xp.2006.40.4093 Investigación Bibliotecológica. Archivonomía, bibliotecología e información; Vol. 20 No. 40 (2006) Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información; Vol. 20 Núm. 40 (2006) Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información; v. 20 n. 40 (2006) 2448-8321 0187-358X 10.22201/iibi.0187358xp.2006.40 spa http://rev-ib.unam.mx/ib/index.php/ib/article/view/4093/3627 http://rev-ib.unam.mx/ib/index.php/ib/article/view/4093/51412 Derechos de autor 2006 Investigación Bibliotecológica: archivonomía, bibliotecología e información |
spellingShingle | ACADEMIC JOURNAL STANDARDIZATION SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL ASSESSMENT NORMALIZACIÓN DE REVISTAS ACADÉMICAS EVALUACIÓN DE REVISTAS CIENTÍFICAS RÍOS ORTEGA, JAIME Assessment of journal standarization in the Index of the Mexican National Council of Science and Technology |
title | Assessment of journal standarization in the Index of the Mexican National Council of Science and Technology |
title_alt | Evaluación de normalización de las revistas contenidas en el Índice del Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de México |
title_full | Assessment of journal standarization in the Index of the Mexican National Council of Science and Technology |
title_fullStr | Assessment of journal standarization in the Index of the Mexican National Council of Science and Technology |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of journal standarization in the Index of the Mexican National Council of Science and Technology |
title_short | Assessment of journal standarization in the Index of the Mexican National Council of Science and Technology |
title_sort | assessment of journal standarization in the index of the mexican national council of science and technology |
topic | ACADEMIC JOURNAL STANDARDIZATION SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL ASSESSMENT NORMALIZACIÓN DE REVISTAS ACADÉMICAS EVALUACIÓN DE REVISTAS CIENTÍFICAS |
topic_facet | ACADEMIC JOURNAL STANDARDIZATION SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL ASSESSMENT NORMALIZACIÓN DE REVISTAS ACADÉMICAS EVALUACIÓN DE REVISTAS CIENTÍFICAS |
url | http://rev-ib.unam.mx/ib/index.php/ib/article/view/4093 https://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iibi.0187358xp.2006.40.4093 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riosortegajaime assessmentofjournalstandarizationintheindexofthemexicannationalcouncilofscienceandtechnology AT riosortegajaime evaluaciondenormalizaciondelasrevistascontenidasenelindicedelconsejonacionaldecienciaytecnologiademexico |