Cargando…

Validation of Methods for Assessment of Dust Levels in Layer Barns

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Currently, veterinarians conducting animal welfare inspections lack validated methods for measuring or assessing dust levels in poultry barns. In the present study, we examined the validity of six methods for dust assessment in layer barns. The methods were either developed for the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mousqué, Solène, Mocz, Frédérique, Riber, Anja B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10000157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36899640
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani13050783
Descripción
Sumario:SIMPLE SUMMARY: Currently, veterinarians conducting animal welfare inspections lack validated methods for measuring or assessing dust levels in poultry barns. In the present study, we examined the validity of six methods for dust assessment in layer barns. The methods were either developed for the purpose or as a refinement of existing methods. Of the six methods examined, the dust sheet test with a test duration of 2–3 h was found to be the most promising method, showing a high validity. Furthermore, results indicated that if more steps are added to the scoring scale, further reduction of the test duration of the dust sheet test may potentially be possible without losing the validity, making the test more feasible for veterinary inspections. More research is needed to examine this hypothesis as well as the reliability that was not addressed in the present study. ABSTRACT: The dust level is included in the animal welfare legislation of the European Union, implying assessment of dust levels during veterinary welfare inspections. This study aimed to develop a valid and feasible method for measuring dust levels in poultry barns. Dust levels were assessed in 11 layer barns using six methods: light scattering measurement, the dust sheet test with durations of 1 h and 2–3 h, respectively, visibility assessment, deposition assessment, and a tape test. As a reference, gravimetric measurements were obtained – a method known to be accurate but unsuitable for veterinary inspection. The dust sheet test 2–3 h showed the highest correlation with the reference method with the data points scattered closely around the regression line and the slope being highly significant (p = 0.00003). In addition, the dust sheet test 2–3 h had the highest adjusted R(2) (0.9192) and the lowest RMSE (0.3553), indicating a high capability of predicting the true concentration value of dust in layer barns. Thus, the dust sheet test with a test duration of 2–3 h is a valid method for assessing dust levels. A major challenge is the test duration as 2–3 h is longer than most veterinary inspections. Nevertheless, results showed that potentially, with some modifications to the scoring scale, the dust sheet test may be reduced to 1 h without losing validity.