Cargando…

Diagnostic performance of microscopic stool examination in Campylobacter infection performed by different medical specialties

BACKGROUND: Microscopic examination of stool samples can contribute to the early diagnosis of Campylobacter gastroenteritis. However, it is unclear whether the diagnostic performance is reliable when performed by physicians. METHODS: This prospective study included fresh stool samples collected from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirose, Yumi, Akashi, Yusaku, Sun, Yu, Notake, Shigeyuki, Ueda, Atsuo, Kato, Daisuke, Muramatsu, Shino, Ishikawa, Hiroichi, Suzuki, Hiromichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10000277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36909784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.596
_version_ 1784903836140306432
author Hirose, Yumi
Akashi, Yusaku
Sun, Yu
Notake, Shigeyuki
Ueda, Atsuo
Kato, Daisuke
Muramatsu, Shino
Ishikawa, Hiroichi
Suzuki, Hiromichi
author_facet Hirose, Yumi
Akashi, Yusaku
Sun, Yu
Notake, Shigeyuki
Ueda, Atsuo
Kato, Daisuke
Muramatsu, Shino
Ishikawa, Hiroichi
Suzuki, Hiromichi
author_sort Hirose, Yumi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Microscopic examination of stool samples can contribute to the early diagnosis of Campylobacter gastroenteritis. However, it is unclear whether the diagnostic performance is reliable when performed by physicians. METHODS: This prospective study included fresh stool samples collected from patients with gastroenteritis between August 2018 and March 2020. The samples were used for microscopic examination through Gram staining. Two physicians, a clinical laboratory technician, and microbiologists performed the examinations. In addition, antigen tests (QuickNavi‐Campylobacter; Denka Co., Ltd.) were evaluated for the samples collected between May 2019 and March 2020. Infection with Campylobacter spp. was confirmed when stool cultures or polymerase chain reaction tests provided positive results. RESULTS: Microscopic examination was performed on 205 samples, of which 46 (22.4%) were positive for Campylobacter spp. For the microscopic examination, the sensitivity and specificity were 53.5% and 98.1% for physician A, 46.7% and 96.2% for physician B, 63.0% and 100% for the clinical laboratory technician, and 67.4% and 100% for microbiologists, respectively. The antigen testing was evaluated in 131 of the 205 samples and showed a sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 99.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Microscopic examination of the stool samples showed high specificity. The sensitivity when the examinations were performed by the physicians was insufficient. The rapid antigen tests can reliably detect Campylobacter spp. in stool samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10000277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100002772023-03-11 Diagnostic performance of microscopic stool examination in Campylobacter infection performed by different medical specialties Hirose, Yumi Akashi, Yusaku Sun, Yu Notake, Shigeyuki Ueda, Atsuo Kato, Daisuke Muramatsu, Shino Ishikawa, Hiroichi Suzuki, Hiromichi J Gen Fam Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Microscopic examination of stool samples can contribute to the early diagnosis of Campylobacter gastroenteritis. However, it is unclear whether the diagnostic performance is reliable when performed by physicians. METHODS: This prospective study included fresh stool samples collected from patients with gastroenteritis between August 2018 and March 2020. The samples were used for microscopic examination through Gram staining. Two physicians, a clinical laboratory technician, and microbiologists performed the examinations. In addition, antigen tests (QuickNavi‐Campylobacter; Denka Co., Ltd.) were evaluated for the samples collected between May 2019 and March 2020. Infection with Campylobacter spp. was confirmed when stool cultures or polymerase chain reaction tests provided positive results. RESULTS: Microscopic examination was performed on 205 samples, of which 46 (22.4%) were positive for Campylobacter spp. For the microscopic examination, the sensitivity and specificity were 53.5% and 98.1% for physician A, 46.7% and 96.2% for physician B, 63.0% and 100% for the clinical laboratory technician, and 67.4% and 100% for microbiologists, respectively. The antigen testing was evaluated in 131 of the 205 samples and showed a sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 99.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Microscopic examination of the stool samples showed high specificity. The sensitivity when the examinations were performed by the physicians was insufficient. The rapid antigen tests can reliably detect Campylobacter spp. in stool samples. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10000277/ /pubmed/36909784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.596 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of General and Family Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Primary Care Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hirose, Yumi
Akashi, Yusaku
Sun, Yu
Notake, Shigeyuki
Ueda, Atsuo
Kato, Daisuke
Muramatsu, Shino
Ishikawa, Hiroichi
Suzuki, Hiromichi
Diagnostic performance of microscopic stool examination in Campylobacter infection performed by different medical specialties
title Diagnostic performance of microscopic stool examination in Campylobacter infection performed by different medical specialties
title_full Diagnostic performance of microscopic stool examination in Campylobacter infection performed by different medical specialties
title_fullStr Diagnostic performance of microscopic stool examination in Campylobacter infection performed by different medical specialties
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic performance of microscopic stool examination in Campylobacter infection performed by different medical specialties
title_short Diagnostic performance of microscopic stool examination in Campylobacter infection performed by different medical specialties
title_sort diagnostic performance of microscopic stool examination in campylobacter infection performed by different medical specialties
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10000277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36909784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.596
work_keys_str_mv AT hiroseyumi diagnosticperformanceofmicroscopicstoolexaminationincampylobacterinfectionperformedbydifferentmedicalspecialties
AT akashiyusaku diagnosticperformanceofmicroscopicstoolexaminationincampylobacterinfectionperformedbydifferentmedicalspecialties
AT sunyu diagnosticperformanceofmicroscopicstoolexaminationincampylobacterinfectionperformedbydifferentmedicalspecialties
AT notakeshigeyuki diagnosticperformanceofmicroscopicstoolexaminationincampylobacterinfectionperformedbydifferentmedicalspecialties
AT uedaatsuo diagnosticperformanceofmicroscopicstoolexaminationincampylobacterinfectionperformedbydifferentmedicalspecialties
AT katodaisuke diagnosticperformanceofmicroscopicstoolexaminationincampylobacterinfectionperformedbydifferentmedicalspecialties
AT muramatsushino diagnosticperformanceofmicroscopicstoolexaminationincampylobacterinfectionperformedbydifferentmedicalspecialties
AT ishikawahiroichi diagnosticperformanceofmicroscopicstoolexaminationincampylobacterinfectionperformedbydifferentmedicalspecialties
AT suzukihiromichi diagnosticperformanceofmicroscopicstoolexaminationincampylobacterinfectionperformedbydifferentmedicalspecialties