Cargando…

Evaluating programs for young people with a family member with mental health challenges: protocol for a mixed methods, longitudinal, collaborative evaluation

BACKGROUND: Young people with a sibling or parent who experiences mental health challenges have their own support needs. Most programs designed for this population lack a strong evidence base, and the involvement of young people in the development and evaluation of programs designed to support them...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reupert, Andrea, Freeman, Nerelie, Hine, Rochelle, Lea, Sophie, Nandakumar, Nivedita, O’Grady, Charlotte, Patlamazoglou, Lefteris, Pettenuzzo, Laura, Foster, Kim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10000348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36899413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01104-7
_version_ 1784903851841683456
author Reupert, Andrea
Freeman, Nerelie
Hine, Rochelle
Lea, Sophie
Nandakumar, Nivedita
O’Grady, Charlotte
Patlamazoglou, Lefteris
Pettenuzzo, Laura
Foster, Kim
author_facet Reupert, Andrea
Freeman, Nerelie
Hine, Rochelle
Lea, Sophie
Nandakumar, Nivedita
O’Grady, Charlotte
Patlamazoglou, Lefteris
Pettenuzzo, Laura
Foster, Kim
author_sort Reupert, Andrea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Young people with a sibling or parent who experiences mental health challenges have their own support needs. Most programs designed for this population lack a strong evidence base, and the involvement of young people in the development and evaluation of programs designed to support them is unclear or lacking. METHODS: This paper describes a protocol for a mixed methods, longitudinal, collaborative evaluation of a suite of programs delivered by The Satellite Foundation, a not-for-profit organisation for young people (5–25 years) who have a family member with mental health challenges. Young people’s lived experience and knowledge will guide the research approach. Institutional ethics approval has been obtained. Over a three year period, approximately 150 young people will be surveyed online on various wellbeing outcome measures, prior to, six and twelve months following program participation with data analysed using multi-level modelling. Groups of young people will be interviewed after participating in different Satellite programs each year. An additional group of young people will be interviewed individually over time. Transcripts will be analysed using thematic analysis. Young people’s creative artworks on their experiences will be included as part of the evaluation data. DISCUSSION: This novel, collaborative evaluation will provide vital evidence on young people’s experiences and outcomes during their time with Satellite. Findings will be used to inform future program development and policy. The approach used here may guide other researchers engaging in collaborative evaluations with community organisations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10000348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100003482023-03-12 Evaluating programs for young people with a family member with mental health challenges: protocol for a mixed methods, longitudinal, collaborative evaluation Reupert, Andrea Freeman, Nerelie Hine, Rochelle Lea, Sophie Nandakumar, Nivedita O’Grady, Charlotte Patlamazoglou, Lefteris Pettenuzzo, Laura Foster, Kim BMC Psychol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Young people with a sibling or parent who experiences mental health challenges have their own support needs. Most programs designed for this population lack a strong evidence base, and the involvement of young people in the development and evaluation of programs designed to support them is unclear or lacking. METHODS: This paper describes a protocol for a mixed methods, longitudinal, collaborative evaluation of a suite of programs delivered by The Satellite Foundation, a not-for-profit organisation for young people (5–25 years) who have a family member with mental health challenges. Young people’s lived experience and knowledge will guide the research approach. Institutional ethics approval has been obtained. Over a three year period, approximately 150 young people will be surveyed online on various wellbeing outcome measures, prior to, six and twelve months following program participation with data analysed using multi-level modelling. Groups of young people will be interviewed after participating in different Satellite programs each year. An additional group of young people will be interviewed individually over time. Transcripts will be analysed using thematic analysis. Young people’s creative artworks on their experiences will be included as part of the evaluation data. DISCUSSION: This novel, collaborative evaluation will provide vital evidence on young people’s experiences and outcomes during their time with Satellite. Findings will be used to inform future program development and policy. The approach used here may guide other researchers engaging in collaborative evaluations with community organisations. BioMed Central 2023-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10000348/ /pubmed/36899413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01104-7 Text en © Crown 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Reupert, Andrea
Freeman, Nerelie
Hine, Rochelle
Lea, Sophie
Nandakumar, Nivedita
O’Grady, Charlotte
Patlamazoglou, Lefteris
Pettenuzzo, Laura
Foster, Kim
Evaluating programs for young people with a family member with mental health challenges: protocol for a mixed methods, longitudinal, collaborative evaluation
title Evaluating programs for young people with a family member with mental health challenges: protocol for a mixed methods, longitudinal, collaborative evaluation
title_full Evaluating programs for young people with a family member with mental health challenges: protocol for a mixed methods, longitudinal, collaborative evaluation
title_fullStr Evaluating programs for young people with a family member with mental health challenges: protocol for a mixed methods, longitudinal, collaborative evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating programs for young people with a family member with mental health challenges: protocol for a mixed methods, longitudinal, collaborative evaluation
title_short Evaluating programs for young people with a family member with mental health challenges: protocol for a mixed methods, longitudinal, collaborative evaluation
title_sort evaluating programs for young people with a family member with mental health challenges: protocol for a mixed methods, longitudinal, collaborative evaluation
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10000348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36899413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01104-7
work_keys_str_mv AT reupertandrea evaluatingprogramsforyoungpeoplewithafamilymemberwithmentalhealthchallengesprotocolforamixedmethodslongitudinalcollaborativeevaluation
AT freemannerelie evaluatingprogramsforyoungpeoplewithafamilymemberwithmentalhealthchallengesprotocolforamixedmethodslongitudinalcollaborativeevaluation
AT hinerochelle evaluatingprogramsforyoungpeoplewithafamilymemberwithmentalhealthchallengesprotocolforamixedmethodslongitudinalcollaborativeevaluation
AT leasophie evaluatingprogramsforyoungpeoplewithafamilymemberwithmentalhealthchallengesprotocolforamixedmethodslongitudinalcollaborativeevaluation
AT nandakumarnivedita evaluatingprogramsforyoungpeoplewithafamilymemberwithmentalhealthchallengesprotocolforamixedmethodslongitudinalcollaborativeevaluation
AT ogradycharlotte evaluatingprogramsforyoungpeoplewithafamilymemberwithmentalhealthchallengesprotocolforamixedmethodslongitudinalcollaborativeevaluation
AT patlamazogloulefteris evaluatingprogramsforyoungpeoplewithafamilymemberwithmentalhealthchallengesprotocolforamixedmethodslongitudinalcollaborativeevaluation
AT pettenuzzolaura evaluatingprogramsforyoungpeoplewithafamilymemberwithmentalhealthchallengesprotocolforamixedmethodslongitudinalcollaborativeevaluation
AT fosterkim evaluatingprogramsforyoungpeoplewithafamilymemberwithmentalhealthchallengesprotocolforamixedmethodslongitudinalcollaborativeevaluation