Cargando…

Interpreting Discordant Monosomy 3 FISH and Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Results in Uveal Melanoma

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary ocular tumor in adults and causes morbidity through lymphovascular metastasis. The presence of monosomy 3 in uveal melanomas is one of the most important prognostic indicators for metastasis. Two major molecular pathology testing modalities used to assess mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Long, Christopher P., Coley, Nicholas, Thorson, John, Lin, Jonathan H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10000399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36900091
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13050946
_version_ 1784903865686032384
author Long, Christopher P.
Coley, Nicholas
Thorson, John
Lin, Jonathan H.
author_facet Long, Christopher P.
Coley, Nicholas
Thorson, John
Lin, Jonathan H.
author_sort Long, Christopher P.
collection PubMed
description Uveal melanoma is the most common primary ocular tumor in adults and causes morbidity through lymphovascular metastasis. The presence of monosomy 3 in uveal melanomas is one of the most important prognostic indicators for metastasis. Two major molecular pathology testing modalities used to assess monosomy 3 are fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Here, we report two cases of discordant monosomy 3 test results in uveal melanoma enucleation specimens, performed using these molecular pathology tests. The first case is of uveal melanoma from a 51-year-old male that showed no evidence of monosomy 3 when assessed by CMA, but where it was subsequently detected by FISH. The second case is of uveal melanoma from a 49-year-old male that showed monosomy 3 at the limit of detection when assessed by CMA, but where it was not detected by subsequent FISH analysis. These two cases underscore the potential benefits of each testing modality for monosomy 3. Mainly, while CMA may be more sensitive to low levels of monosomy 3, FISH may be best method for small tumors with high levels of adjacent normal ocular tissue. Our cases suggest that both testing methods should be pursued for uveal melanoma, with a single positive result for either test interpreted as indicating the presence of monosomy 3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10000399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100003992023-03-11 Interpreting Discordant Monosomy 3 FISH and Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Results in Uveal Melanoma Long, Christopher P. Coley, Nicholas Thorson, John Lin, Jonathan H. Diagnostics (Basel) Interesting Images Uveal melanoma is the most common primary ocular tumor in adults and causes morbidity through lymphovascular metastasis. The presence of monosomy 3 in uveal melanomas is one of the most important prognostic indicators for metastasis. Two major molecular pathology testing modalities used to assess monosomy 3 are fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Here, we report two cases of discordant monosomy 3 test results in uveal melanoma enucleation specimens, performed using these molecular pathology tests. The first case is of uveal melanoma from a 51-year-old male that showed no evidence of monosomy 3 when assessed by CMA, but where it was subsequently detected by FISH. The second case is of uveal melanoma from a 49-year-old male that showed monosomy 3 at the limit of detection when assessed by CMA, but where it was not detected by subsequent FISH analysis. These two cases underscore the potential benefits of each testing modality for monosomy 3. Mainly, while CMA may be more sensitive to low levels of monosomy 3, FISH may be best method for small tumors with high levels of adjacent normal ocular tissue. Our cases suggest that both testing methods should be pursued for uveal melanoma, with a single positive result for either test interpreted as indicating the presence of monosomy 3. MDPI 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10000399/ /pubmed/36900091 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13050946 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Interesting Images
Long, Christopher P.
Coley, Nicholas
Thorson, John
Lin, Jonathan H.
Interpreting Discordant Monosomy 3 FISH and Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Results in Uveal Melanoma
title Interpreting Discordant Monosomy 3 FISH and Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Results in Uveal Melanoma
title_full Interpreting Discordant Monosomy 3 FISH and Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Results in Uveal Melanoma
title_fullStr Interpreting Discordant Monosomy 3 FISH and Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Results in Uveal Melanoma
title_full_unstemmed Interpreting Discordant Monosomy 3 FISH and Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Results in Uveal Melanoma
title_short Interpreting Discordant Monosomy 3 FISH and Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Results in Uveal Melanoma
title_sort interpreting discordant monosomy 3 fish and chromosomal microarray analysis results in uveal melanoma
topic Interesting Images
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10000399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36900091
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13050946
work_keys_str_mv AT longchristopherp interpretingdiscordantmonosomy3fishandchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisresultsinuvealmelanoma
AT coleynicholas interpretingdiscordantmonosomy3fishandchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisresultsinuvealmelanoma
AT thorsonjohn interpretingdiscordantmonosomy3fishandchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisresultsinuvealmelanoma
AT linjonathanh interpretingdiscordantmonosomy3fishandchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisresultsinuvealmelanoma