Cargando…

Assessment of the Carotid Bodies in Magnetic Resonance—A Head-to-Head Comparison with Computed Tomography

Objectives: To evaluate carotid body visibility in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) studies and to compare the results to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Methods: Two observers separately evaluated MR and CT examinations of 58 patients. MR scans were acquired with contrast-enhan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Budynko, Lukasz, Nowicki, Tomasz K., Kaszubowski, Mariusz F., Swieton, Dominik, Piskunowicz, Maciej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10000419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36900137
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13050993
_version_ 1784903871237193728
author Budynko, Lukasz
Nowicki, Tomasz K.
Kaszubowski, Mariusz F.
Swieton, Dominik
Piskunowicz, Maciej
author_facet Budynko, Lukasz
Nowicki, Tomasz K.
Kaszubowski, Mariusz F.
Swieton, Dominik
Piskunowicz, Maciej
author_sort Budynko, Lukasz
collection PubMed
description Objectives: To evaluate carotid body visibility in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) studies and to compare the results to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Methods: Two observers separately evaluated MR and CT examinations of 58 patients. MR scans were acquired with contrast-enhanced isometric T1-weighted water-only Dixon sequence. CT examinations were performed 90 s after contrast agent administration. Carotid bodies’ dimensions were noted and their volumes calculated. To quantify the agreement between both methods, Bland–Altman plots were computed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and its localization-oriented variant (LROC) curves were plotted. Results: Of the 116 expected carotid bodies, 105 were found on CT and 103 on MR at least by a single observer. Significantly more findings were concordant in CT (92.2%) than in MR (83.6%). The mean carotid body volume was smaller in CT (19.4 mm(3)) than in MR (20.8 mm(3)). The inter-observer agreement on volumes was moderately good (ICC (2,k) 0.42, p < 0.001), but with significant systematic error. The diagnostic performance of the MR method added up to 88.4% of the ROC’s area under the curve and 78.0% in the LROC algorithm. Conclusions: Carotid bodies can be visualized on contrast-enhanced MR with good accuracy and inter-observer agreement. Carotid bodies assessed on MR had similar morphology as described in anatomical studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10000419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100004192023-03-11 Assessment of the Carotid Bodies in Magnetic Resonance—A Head-to-Head Comparison with Computed Tomography Budynko, Lukasz Nowicki, Tomasz K. Kaszubowski, Mariusz F. Swieton, Dominik Piskunowicz, Maciej Diagnostics (Basel) Article Objectives: To evaluate carotid body visibility in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) studies and to compare the results to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Methods: Two observers separately evaluated MR and CT examinations of 58 patients. MR scans were acquired with contrast-enhanced isometric T1-weighted water-only Dixon sequence. CT examinations were performed 90 s after contrast agent administration. Carotid bodies’ dimensions were noted and their volumes calculated. To quantify the agreement between both methods, Bland–Altman plots were computed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and its localization-oriented variant (LROC) curves were plotted. Results: Of the 116 expected carotid bodies, 105 were found on CT and 103 on MR at least by a single observer. Significantly more findings were concordant in CT (92.2%) than in MR (83.6%). The mean carotid body volume was smaller in CT (19.4 mm(3)) than in MR (20.8 mm(3)). The inter-observer agreement on volumes was moderately good (ICC (2,k) 0.42, p < 0.001), but with significant systematic error. The diagnostic performance of the MR method added up to 88.4% of the ROC’s area under the curve and 78.0% in the LROC algorithm. Conclusions: Carotid bodies can be visualized on contrast-enhanced MR with good accuracy and inter-observer agreement. Carotid bodies assessed on MR had similar morphology as described in anatomical studies. MDPI 2023-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10000419/ /pubmed/36900137 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13050993 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Budynko, Lukasz
Nowicki, Tomasz K.
Kaszubowski, Mariusz F.
Swieton, Dominik
Piskunowicz, Maciej
Assessment of the Carotid Bodies in Magnetic Resonance—A Head-to-Head Comparison with Computed Tomography
title Assessment of the Carotid Bodies in Magnetic Resonance—A Head-to-Head Comparison with Computed Tomography
title_full Assessment of the Carotid Bodies in Magnetic Resonance—A Head-to-Head Comparison with Computed Tomography
title_fullStr Assessment of the Carotid Bodies in Magnetic Resonance—A Head-to-Head Comparison with Computed Tomography
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the Carotid Bodies in Magnetic Resonance—A Head-to-Head Comparison with Computed Tomography
title_short Assessment of the Carotid Bodies in Magnetic Resonance—A Head-to-Head Comparison with Computed Tomography
title_sort assessment of the carotid bodies in magnetic resonance—a head-to-head comparison with computed tomography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10000419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36900137
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13050993
work_keys_str_mv AT budynkolukasz assessmentofthecarotidbodiesinmagneticresonanceaheadtoheadcomparisonwithcomputedtomography
AT nowickitomaszk assessmentofthecarotidbodiesinmagneticresonanceaheadtoheadcomparisonwithcomputedtomography
AT kaszubowskimariuszf assessmentofthecarotidbodiesinmagneticresonanceaheadtoheadcomparisonwithcomputedtomography
AT swietondominik assessmentofthecarotidbodiesinmagneticresonanceaheadtoheadcomparisonwithcomputedtomography
AT piskunowiczmaciej assessmentofthecarotidbodiesinmagneticresonanceaheadtoheadcomparisonwithcomputedtomography