Cargando…

Comparing Detection Schemes for Adversarial Images against Deep Learning Models for Cancer Imaging

SIMPLE SUMMARY: While deep learning has become a powerful tool in analysis of cancer imaging, deep learning models have potential vulnerabilities that pose security threats in the setting of clinical implementation. One weakness of deep learning models is that they can be deceived by adversarial ima...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joel, Marina Z., Avesta, Arman, Yang, Daniel X., Zhou, Jian-Ge, Omuro, Antonio, Herbst, Roy S., Krumholz, Harlan M., Aneja, Sanjay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10000732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36900339
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15051548
_version_ 1784903952296312832
author Joel, Marina Z.
Avesta, Arman
Yang, Daniel X.
Zhou, Jian-Ge
Omuro, Antonio
Herbst, Roy S.
Krumholz, Harlan M.
Aneja, Sanjay
author_facet Joel, Marina Z.
Avesta, Arman
Yang, Daniel X.
Zhou, Jian-Ge
Omuro, Antonio
Herbst, Roy S.
Krumholz, Harlan M.
Aneja, Sanjay
author_sort Joel, Marina Z.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: While deep learning has become a powerful tool in analysis of cancer imaging, deep learning models have potential vulnerabilities that pose security threats in the setting of clinical implementation. One weakness of deep learning models is that they can be deceived by adversarial images, which are manipulated images that have pixels intentionally perturbed to alter the output of the deep learning model. Recent research has shown that adversarial detection models can differentiate adversarial images from normal images to protect deep learning models from attack. We compared the effectiveness of different adversarial detection schemes, using three cancer imaging datasets (computed tomography, mammography, and magnetic resonance imaging). We found that that the detection schemes demonstrate strong performance overall but exhibit limited efficacy in detecting a subset of adversarial images. We believe our findings provide a useful basis in the application of adversarial defenses to deep learning models for medical images in oncology. ABSTRACT: Deep learning (DL) models have demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in the classification of diagnostic imaging in oncology. However, DL models for medical images can be compromised by adversarial images, where pixel values of input images are manipulated to deceive the DL model. To address this limitation, our study investigates the detectability of adversarial images in oncology using multiple detection schemes. Experiments were conducted on thoracic computed tomography (CT) scans, mammography, and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For each dataset we trained a convolutional neural network to classify the presence or absence of malignancy. We trained five DL and machine learning (ML)-based detection models and tested their performance in detecting adversarial images. Adversarial images generated using projected gradient descent (PGD) with a perturbation size of 0.004 were detected by the ResNet detection model with an accuracy of 100% for CT, 100% for mammogram, and 90.0% for MRI. Overall, adversarial images were detected with high accuracy in settings where adversarial perturbation was above set thresholds. Adversarial detection should be considered alongside adversarial training as a defense technique to protect DL models for cancer imaging classification from the threat of adversarial images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10000732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100007322023-03-11 Comparing Detection Schemes for Adversarial Images against Deep Learning Models for Cancer Imaging Joel, Marina Z. Avesta, Arman Yang, Daniel X. Zhou, Jian-Ge Omuro, Antonio Herbst, Roy S. Krumholz, Harlan M. Aneja, Sanjay Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: While deep learning has become a powerful tool in analysis of cancer imaging, deep learning models have potential vulnerabilities that pose security threats in the setting of clinical implementation. One weakness of deep learning models is that they can be deceived by adversarial images, which are manipulated images that have pixels intentionally perturbed to alter the output of the deep learning model. Recent research has shown that adversarial detection models can differentiate adversarial images from normal images to protect deep learning models from attack. We compared the effectiveness of different adversarial detection schemes, using three cancer imaging datasets (computed tomography, mammography, and magnetic resonance imaging). We found that that the detection schemes demonstrate strong performance overall but exhibit limited efficacy in detecting a subset of adversarial images. We believe our findings provide a useful basis in the application of adversarial defenses to deep learning models for medical images in oncology. ABSTRACT: Deep learning (DL) models have demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in the classification of diagnostic imaging in oncology. However, DL models for medical images can be compromised by adversarial images, where pixel values of input images are manipulated to deceive the DL model. To address this limitation, our study investigates the detectability of adversarial images in oncology using multiple detection schemes. Experiments were conducted on thoracic computed tomography (CT) scans, mammography, and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For each dataset we trained a convolutional neural network to classify the presence or absence of malignancy. We trained five DL and machine learning (ML)-based detection models and tested their performance in detecting adversarial images. Adversarial images generated using projected gradient descent (PGD) with a perturbation size of 0.004 were detected by the ResNet detection model with an accuracy of 100% for CT, 100% for mammogram, and 90.0% for MRI. Overall, adversarial images were detected with high accuracy in settings where adversarial perturbation was above set thresholds. Adversarial detection should be considered alongside adversarial training as a defense technique to protect DL models for cancer imaging classification from the threat of adversarial images. MDPI 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10000732/ /pubmed/36900339 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15051548 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Joel, Marina Z.
Avesta, Arman
Yang, Daniel X.
Zhou, Jian-Ge
Omuro, Antonio
Herbst, Roy S.
Krumholz, Harlan M.
Aneja, Sanjay
Comparing Detection Schemes for Adversarial Images against Deep Learning Models for Cancer Imaging
title Comparing Detection Schemes for Adversarial Images against Deep Learning Models for Cancer Imaging
title_full Comparing Detection Schemes for Adversarial Images against Deep Learning Models for Cancer Imaging
title_fullStr Comparing Detection Schemes for Adversarial Images against Deep Learning Models for Cancer Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Detection Schemes for Adversarial Images against Deep Learning Models for Cancer Imaging
title_short Comparing Detection Schemes for Adversarial Images against Deep Learning Models for Cancer Imaging
title_sort comparing detection schemes for adversarial images against deep learning models for cancer imaging
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10000732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36900339
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15051548
work_keys_str_mv AT joelmarinaz comparingdetectionschemesforadversarialimagesagainstdeeplearningmodelsforcancerimaging
AT avestaarman comparingdetectionschemesforadversarialimagesagainstdeeplearningmodelsforcancerimaging
AT yangdanielx comparingdetectionschemesforadversarialimagesagainstdeeplearningmodelsforcancerimaging
AT zhoujiange comparingdetectionschemesforadversarialimagesagainstdeeplearningmodelsforcancerimaging
AT omuroantonio comparingdetectionschemesforadversarialimagesagainstdeeplearningmodelsforcancerimaging
AT herbstroys comparingdetectionschemesforadversarialimagesagainstdeeplearningmodelsforcancerimaging
AT krumholzharlanm comparingdetectionschemesforadversarialimagesagainstdeeplearningmodelsforcancerimaging
AT anejasanjay comparingdetectionschemesforadversarialimagesagainstdeeplearningmodelsforcancerimaging