Cargando…

Label Distribution Learning for Automatic Cancer Grading of Histopathological Images of Prostate Cancer

SIMPLE SUMMARY: We aimed to develop and evaluate an automatic prediction system for grading histopathological images of prostate cancer using a deep learning model and label distribution learning. Our results show that the label distribution learning improved the diagnostic performance of the automa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishio, Mizuho, Matsuo, Hidetoshi, Kurata, Yasuhisa, Sugiyama, Osamu, Fujimoto, Koji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10000939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36900325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15051535
_version_ 1784904008051195904
author Nishio, Mizuho
Matsuo, Hidetoshi
Kurata, Yasuhisa
Sugiyama, Osamu
Fujimoto, Koji
author_facet Nishio, Mizuho
Matsuo, Hidetoshi
Kurata, Yasuhisa
Sugiyama, Osamu
Fujimoto, Koji
author_sort Nishio, Mizuho
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: We aimed to develop and evaluate an automatic prediction system for grading histopathological images of prostate cancer using a deep learning model and label distribution learning. Our results show that the label distribution learning improved the diagnostic performance of the automatic prediction system for the cancer grading. ABSTRACT: We aimed to develop and evaluate an automatic prediction system for grading histopathological images of prostate cancer. A total of 10,616 whole slide images (WSIs) of prostate tissue were used in this study. The WSIs from one institution (5160 WSIs) were used as the development set, while those from the other institution (5456 WSIs) were used as the unseen test set. Label distribution learning (LDL) was used to address a difference in label characteristics between the development and test sets. A combination of EfficientNet (a deep learning model) and LDL was utilized to develop an automatic prediction system. Quadratic weighted kappa (QWK) and accuracy in the test set were used as the evaluation metrics. The QWK and accuracy were compared between systems with and without LDL to evaluate the usefulness of LDL in system development. The QWK and accuracy were 0.364 and 0.407 in the systems with LDL and 0.240 and 0.247 in those without LDL, respectively. Thus, LDL improved the diagnostic performance of the automatic prediction system for the grading of histopathological images for cancer. By handling the difference in label characteristics using LDL, the diagnostic performance of the automatic prediction system could be improved for prostate cancer grading.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10000939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100009392023-03-11 Label Distribution Learning for Automatic Cancer Grading of Histopathological Images of Prostate Cancer Nishio, Mizuho Matsuo, Hidetoshi Kurata, Yasuhisa Sugiyama, Osamu Fujimoto, Koji Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: We aimed to develop and evaluate an automatic prediction system for grading histopathological images of prostate cancer using a deep learning model and label distribution learning. Our results show that the label distribution learning improved the diagnostic performance of the automatic prediction system for the cancer grading. ABSTRACT: We aimed to develop and evaluate an automatic prediction system for grading histopathological images of prostate cancer. A total of 10,616 whole slide images (WSIs) of prostate tissue were used in this study. The WSIs from one institution (5160 WSIs) were used as the development set, while those from the other institution (5456 WSIs) were used as the unseen test set. Label distribution learning (LDL) was used to address a difference in label characteristics between the development and test sets. A combination of EfficientNet (a deep learning model) and LDL was utilized to develop an automatic prediction system. Quadratic weighted kappa (QWK) and accuracy in the test set were used as the evaluation metrics. The QWK and accuracy were compared between systems with and without LDL to evaluate the usefulness of LDL in system development. The QWK and accuracy were 0.364 and 0.407 in the systems with LDL and 0.240 and 0.247 in those without LDL, respectively. Thus, LDL improved the diagnostic performance of the automatic prediction system for the grading of histopathological images for cancer. By handling the difference in label characteristics using LDL, the diagnostic performance of the automatic prediction system could be improved for prostate cancer grading. MDPI 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10000939/ /pubmed/36900325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15051535 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nishio, Mizuho
Matsuo, Hidetoshi
Kurata, Yasuhisa
Sugiyama, Osamu
Fujimoto, Koji
Label Distribution Learning for Automatic Cancer Grading of Histopathological Images of Prostate Cancer
title Label Distribution Learning for Automatic Cancer Grading of Histopathological Images of Prostate Cancer
title_full Label Distribution Learning for Automatic Cancer Grading of Histopathological Images of Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Label Distribution Learning for Automatic Cancer Grading of Histopathological Images of Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Label Distribution Learning for Automatic Cancer Grading of Histopathological Images of Prostate Cancer
title_short Label Distribution Learning for Automatic Cancer Grading of Histopathological Images of Prostate Cancer
title_sort label distribution learning for automatic cancer grading of histopathological images of prostate cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10000939/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36900325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15051535
work_keys_str_mv AT nishiomizuho labeldistributionlearningforautomaticcancergradingofhistopathologicalimagesofprostatecancer
AT matsuohidetoshi labeldistributionlearningforautomaticcancergradingofhistopathologicalimagesofprostatecancer
AT kuratayasuhisa labeldistributionlearningforautomaticcancergradingofhistopathologicalimagesofprostatecancer
AT sugiyamaosamu labeldistributionlearningforautomaticcancergradingofhistopathologicalimagesofprostatecancer
AT fujimotokoji labeldistributionlearningforautomaticcancergradingofhistopathologicalimagesofprostatecancer