Cargando…
A Review on Biological Effects of Ultrasounds: Key Messages for Clinicians
Ultrasound (US) is acoustic energy that interacts with human tissues, thus, producing bioeffects that may be hazardous, especially in sensitive organs (i.e., brain, eye, heart, lung, and digestive tract) and embryos/fetuses. Two basic mechanisms of US interaction with biological systems have been id...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10001275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36899998 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13050855 |
_version_ | 1784904095369265152 |
---|---|
author | Quarato, Carla Maria Irene Lacedonia, Donato Salvemini, Michela Tuccari, Giulia Mastrodonato, Grazia Villani, Rosanna Fiore, Lucia Angela Scioscia, Giulia Mirijello, Antonio Saponara, Annarita Sperandeo, Marco |
author_facet | Quarato, Carla Maria Irene Lacedonia, Donato Salvemini, Michela Tuccari, Giulia Mastrodonato, Grazia Villani, Rosanna Fiore, Lucia Angela Scioscia, Giulia Mirijello, Antonio Saponara, Annarita Sperandeo, Marco |
author_sort | Quarato, Carla Maria Irene |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ultrasound (US) is acoustic energy that interacts with human tissues, thus, producing bioeffects that may be hazardous, especially in sensitive organs (i.e., brain, eye, heart, lung, and digestive tract) and embryos/fetuses. Two basic mechanisms of US interaction with biological systems have been identified: thermal and non-thermal. As a result, thermal and mechanical indexes have been developed to provide a means of assessing the potential for biological effects from exposure to diagnostic US. The main aims of this paper were to describe the models and assumptions used to estimate the “safety” of acoustic outputs and indices and to summarize the current state of knowledge about US-induced effects on living systems deriving from in vitro models and in vivo experiments on animals. This review work has made it possible to highlight the limits associated with the use of the estimated safety values of thermal and mechanical indices relating above all to the use of new US technologies, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) shear wave elastography (SWE). US for diagnostic and research purposes has been officially declared safe, and no harmful biological effects in humans have yet been demonstrated with new imaging modalities; however, physicians should be adequately informed on the potential risks of biological effects. US exposure, according to the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle, should be as low as reasonably possible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10001275 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100012752023-03-11 A Review on Biological Effects of Ultrasounds: Key Messages for Clinicians Quarato, Carla Maria Irene Lacedonia, Donato Salvemini, Michela Tuccari, Giulia Mastrodonato, Grazia Villani, Rosanna Fiore, Lucia Angela Scioscia, Giulia Mirijello, Antonio Saponara, Annarita Sperandeo, Marco Diagnostics (Basel) Review Ultrasound (US) is acoustic energy that interacts with human tissues, thus, producing bioeffects that may be hazardous, especially in sensitive organs (i.e., brain, eye, heart, lung, and digestive tract) and embryos/fetuses. Two basic mechanisms of US interaction with biological systems have been identified: thermal and non-thermal. As a result, thermal and mechanical indexes have been developed to provide a means of assessing the potential for biological effects from exposure to diagnostic US. The main aims of this paper were to describe the models and assumptions used to estimate the “safety” of acoustic outputs and indices and to summarize the current state of knowledge about US-induced effects on living systems deriving from in vitro models and in vivo experiments on animals. This review work has made it possible to highlight the limits associated with the use of the estimated safety values of thermal and mechanical indices relating above all to the use of new US technologies, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) shear wave elastography (SWE). US for diagnostic and research purposes has been officially declared safe, and no harmful biological effects in humans have yet been demonstrated with new imaging modalities; however, physicians should be adequately informed on the potential risks of biological effects. US exposure, according to the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle, should be as low as reasonably possible. MDPI 2023-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10001275/ /pubmed/36899998 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13050855 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Quarato, Carla Maria Irene Lacedonia, Donato Salvemini, Michela Tuccari, Giulia Mastrodonato, Grazia Villani, Rosanna Fiore, Lucia Angela Scioscia, Giulia Mirijello, Antonio Saponara, Annarita Sperandeo, Marco A Review on Biological Effects of Ultrasounds: Key Messages for Clinicians |
title | A Review on Biological Effects of Ultrasounds: Key Messages for Clinicians |
title_full | A Review on Biological Effects of Ultrasounds: Key Messages for Clinicians |
title_fullStr | A Review on Biological Effects of Ultrasounds: Key Messages for Clinicians |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review on Biological Effects of Ultrasounds: Key Messages for Clinicians |
title_short | A Review on Biological Effects of Ultrasounds: Key Messages for Clinicians |
title_sort | review on biological effects of ultrasounds: key messages for clinicians |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10001275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36899998 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13050855 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quaratocarlamariairene areviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT lacedoniadonato areviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT salveminimichela areviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT tuccarigiulia areviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT mastrodonatograzia areviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT villanirosanna areviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT fioreluciaangela areviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT sciosciagiulia areviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT mirijelloantonio areviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT saponaraannarita areviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT sperandeomarco areviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT quaratocarlamariairene reviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT lacedoniadonato reviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT salveminimichela reviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT tuccarigiulia reviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT mastrodonatograzia reviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT villanirosanna reviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT fioreluciaangela reviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT sciosciagiulia reviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT mirijelloantonio reviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT saponaraannarita reviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians AT sperandeomarco reviewonbiologicaleffectsofultrasoundskeymessagesforclinicians |