Cargando…

A Novel Technique of Amniotic Membrane Preparation Mimicking Limbal Epithelial Crypts Enhances the Number of Progenitor Cells upon Expansion

We aimed to investigate whether a novel technique of human amniotic membrane (HAM) preparation that mimics the crypts in the limbus enhances the number of progenitor cells cultured ex vivo. The HAMs were sutured on polyester membrane (1) standardly, to obtain a flat HAM surface, or (2) loosely, achi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bisevac, Jovana, Moe, Morten Carstens, Drolsum, Liv, Kristianslund, Olav, Petrovski, Goran, Noer, Agate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10001367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36899873
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells12050738
_version_ 1784904119615488000
author Bisevac, Jovana
Moe, Morten Carstens
Drolsum, Liv
Kristianslund, Olav
Petrovski, Goran
Noer, Agate
author_facet Bisevac, Jovana
Moe, Morten Carstens
Drolsum, Liv
Kristianslund, Olav
Petrovski, Goran
Noer, Agate
author_sort Bisevac, Jovana
collection PubMed
description We aimed to investigate whether a novel technique of human amniotic membrane (HAM) preparation that mimics the crypts in the limbus enhances the number of progenitor cells cultured ex vivo. The HAMs were sutured on polyester membrane (1) standardly, to obtain a flat HAM surface, or (2) loosely, achieving the radial folding to mimic crypts in the limbus. Immunohistochemistry was used to demonstrate a higher number of cells positive for progenitor markers p63α (37.56 ± 3.34% vs. 62.53 ± 3.32%, p = 0.01) and SOX9 (35.53 ± 0.96% vs. 43.23 ± 2.32%, p = 0.04), proliferation marker Ki-67 (8.43 ± 0.38 % vs. 22.38 ± 1.95 %, p = 0.002) in the crypt-like HAMs vs. flat HAMs, while no difference was found for the quiescence marker CEBPD (22.99 ± 2.96% vs. 30.49 ± 3.33 %, p = 0.17). Most of the cells stained negative for the corneal epithelial differentiation marker KRT3/12, and some were positive for N-cadherin in the crypt-like structures, but there was no difference in staining for E-cadherin and CX43 in crypt-like HAMs vs. flat HAMs. This novel HAM preparation method enhanced the number of progenitor cells expanded in the crypt-like HAM compared to cultures on the conventional flat HAM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10001367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100013672023-03-11 A Novel Technique of Amniotic Membrane Preparation Mimicking Limbal Epithelial Crypts Enhances the Number of Progenitor Cells upon Expansion Bisevac, Jovana Moe, Morten Carstens Drolsum, Liv Kristianslund, Olav Petrovski, Goran Noer, Agate Cells Article We aimed to investigate whether a novel technique of human amniotic membrane (HAM) preparation that mimics the crypts in the limbus enhances the number of progenitor cells cultured ex vivo. The HAMs were sutured on polyester membrane (1) standardly, to obtain a flat HAM surface, or (2) loosely, achieving the radial folding to mimic crypts in the limbus. Immunohistochemistry was used to demonstrate a higher number of cells positive for progenitor markers p63α (37.56 ± 3.34% vs. 62.53 ± 3.32%, p = 0.01) and SOX9 (35.53 ± 0.96% vs. 43.23 ± 2.32%, p = 0.04), proliferation marker Ki-67 (8.43 ± 0.38 % vs. 22.38 ± 1.95 %, p = 0.002) in the crypt-like HAMs vs. flat HAMs, while no difference was found for the quiescence marker CEBPD (22.99 ± 2.96% vs. 30.49 ± 3.33 %, p = 0.17). Most of the cells stained negative for the corneal epithelial differentiation marker KRT3/12, and some were positive for N-cadherin in the crypt-like structures, but there was no difference in staining for E-cadherin and CX43 in crypt-like HAMs vs. flat HAMs. This novel HAM preparation method enhanced the number of progenitor cells expanded in the crypt-like HAM compared to cultures on the conventional flat HAM. MDPI 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10001367/ /pubmed/36899873 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells12050738 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bisevac, Jovana
Moe, Morten Carstens
Drolsum, Liv
Kristianslund, Olav
Petrovski, Goran
Noer, Agate
A Novel Technique of Amniotic Membrane Preparation Mimicking Limbal Epithelial Crypts Enhances the Number of Progenitor Cells upon Expansion
title A Novel Technique of Amniotic Membrane Preparation Mimicking Limbal Epithelial Crypts Enhances the Number of Progenitor Cells upon Expansion
title_full A Novel Technique of Amniotic Membrane Preparation Mimicking Limbal Epithelial Crypts Enhances the Number of Progenitor Cells upon Expansion
title_fullStr A Novel Technique of Amniotic Membrane Preparation Mimicking Limbal Epithelial Crypts Enhances the Number of Progenitor Cells upon Expansion
title_full_unstemmed A Novel Technique of Amniotic Membrane Preparation Mimicking Limbal Epithelial Crypts Enhances the Number of Progenitor Cells upon Expansion
title_short A Novel Technique of Amniotic Membrane Preparation Mimicking Limbal Epithelial Crypts Enhances the Number of Progenitor Cells upon Expansion
title_sort novel technique of amniotic membrane preparation mimicking limbal epithelial crypts enhances the number of progenitor cells upon expansion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10001367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36899873
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells12050738
work_keys_str_mv AT bisevacjovana anoveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion
AT moemortencarstens anoveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion
AT drolsumliv anoveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion
AT kristianslundolav anoveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion
AT petrovskigoran anoveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion
AT noeragate anoveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion
AT bisevacjovana noveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion
AT moemortencarstens noveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion
AT drolsumliv noveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion
AT kristianslundolav noveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion
AT petrovskigoran noveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion
AT noeragate noveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion