Cargando…
A Novel Technique of Amniotic Membrane Preparation Mimicking Limbal Epithelial Crypts Enhances the Number of Progenitor Cells upon Expansion
We aimed to investigate whether a novel technique of human amniotic membrane (HAM) preparation that mimics the crypts in the limbus enhances the number of progenitor cells cultured ex vivo. The HAMs were sutured on polyester membrane (1) standardly, to obtain a flat HAM surface, or (2) loosely, achi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10001367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36899873 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells12050738 |
_version_ | 1784904119615488000 |
---|---|
author | Bisevac, Jovana Moe, Morten Carstens Drolsum, Liv Kristianslund, Olav Petrovski, Goran Noer, Agate |
author_facet | Bisevac, Jovana Moe, Morten Carstens Drolsum, Liv Kristianslund, Olav Petrovski, Goran Noer, Agate |
author_sort | Bisevac, Jovana |
collection | PubMed |
description | We aimed to investigate whether a novel technique of human amniotic membrane (HAM) preparation that mimics the crypts in the limbus enhances the number of progenitor cells cultured ex vivo. The HAMs were sutured on polyester membrane (1) standardly, to obtain a flat HAM surface, or (2) loosely, achieving the radial folding to mimic crypts in the limbus. Immunohistochemistry was used to demonstrate a higher number of cells positive for progenitor markers p63α (37.56 ± 3.34% vs. 62.53 ± 3.32%, p = 0.01) and SOX9 (35.53 ± 0.96% vs. 43.23 ± 2.32%, p = 0.04), proliferation marker Ki-67 (8.43 ± 0.38 % vs. 22.38 ± 1.95 %, p = 0.002) in the crypt-like HAMs vs. flat HAMs, while no difference was found for the quiescence marker CEBPD (22.99 ± 2.96% vs. 30.49 ± 3.33 %, p = 0.17). Most of the cells stained negative for the corneal epithelial differentiation marker KRT3/12, and some were positive for N-cadherin in the crypt-like structures, but there was no difference in staining for E-cadherin and CX43 in crypt-like HAMs vs. flat HAMs. This novel HAM preparation method enhanced the number of progenitor cells expanded in the crypt-like HAM compared to cultures on the conventional flat HAM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10001367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100013672023-03-11 A Novel Technique of Amniotic Membrane Preparation Mimicking Limbal Epithelial Crypts Enhances the Number of Progenitor Cells upon Expansion Bisevac, Jovana Moe, Morten Carstens Drolsum, Liv Kristianslund, Olav Petrovski, Goran Noer, Agate Cells Article We aimed to investigate whether a novel technique of human amniotic membrane (HAM) preparation that mimics the crypts in the limbus enhances the number of progenitor cells cultured ex vivo. The HAMs were sutured on polyester membrane (1) standardly, to obtain a flat HAM surface, or (2) loosely, achieving the radial folding to mimic crypts in the limbus. Immunohistochemistry was used to demonstrate a higher number of cells positive for progenitor markers p63α (37.56 ± 3.34% vs. 62.53 ± 3.32%, p = 0.01) and SOX9 (35.53 ± 0.96% vs. 43.23 ± 2.32%, p = 0.04), proliferation marker Ki-67 (8.43 ± 0.38 % vs. 22.38 ± 1.95 %, p = 0.002) in the crypt-like HAMs vs. flat HAMs, while no difference was found for the quiescence marker CEBPD (22.99 ± 2.96% vs. 30.49 ± 3.33 %, p = 0.17). Most of the cells stained negative for the corneal epithelial differentiation marker KRT3/12, and some were positive for N-cadherin in the crypt-like structures, but there was no difference in staining for E-cadherin and CX43 in crypt-like HAMs vs. flat HAMs. This novel HAM preparation method enhanced the number of progenitor cells expanded in the crypt-like HAM compared to cultures on the conventional flat HAM. MDPI 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10001367/ /pubmed/36899873 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells12050738 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bisevac, Jovana Moe, Morten Carstens Drolsum, Liv Kristianslund, Olav Petrovski, Goran Noer, Agate A Novel Technique of Amniotic Membrane Preparation Mimicking Limbal Epithelial Crypts Enhances the Number of Progenitor Cells upon Expansion |
title | A Novel Technique of Amniotic Membrane Preparation Mimicking Limbal Epithelial Crypts Enhances the Number of Progenitor Cells upon Expansion |
title_full | A Novel Technique of Amniotic Membrane Preparation Mimicking Limbal Epithelial Crypts Enhances the Number of Progenitor Cells upon Expansion |
title_fullStr | A Novel Technique of Amniotic Membrane Preparation Mimicking Limbal Epithelial Crypts Enhances the Number of Progenitor Cells upon Expansion |
title_full_unstemmed | A Novel Technique of Amniotic Membrane Preparation Mimicking Limbal Epithelial Crypts Enhances the Number of Progenitor Cells upon Expansion |
title_short | A Novel Technique of Amniotic Membrane Preparation Mimicking Limbal Epithelial Crypts Enhances the Number of Progenitor Cells upon Expansion |
title_sort | novel technique of amniotic membrane preparation mimicking limbal epithelial crypts enhances the number of progenitor cells upon expansion |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10001367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36899873 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells12050738 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bisevacjovana anoveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion AT moemortencarstens anoveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion AT drolsumliv anoveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion AT kristianslundolav anoveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion AT petrovskigoran anoveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion AT noeragate anoveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion AT bisevacjovana noveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion AT moemortencarstens noveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion AT drolsumliv noveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion AT kristianslundolav noveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion AT petrovskigoran noveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion AT noeragate noveltechniqueofamnioticmembranepreparationmimickinglimbalepithelialcryptsenhancesthenumberofprogenitorcellsuponexpansion |