Cargando…

Motor Development Comparison between Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Alberta Infant Motor Scale

The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) was developed to evaluate the motor development of infants up to 18 months of age. We studied 252 infants in three groups (105 healthy preterm infants (HPI), 50 preterm infants with brain injury (PIBI), and 97 healthy full-term infants (HFI) under 18 months, cor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ko, Jooyeon, Lim, Hyun Kyoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10001437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36900838
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053819
_version_ 1784904135977467904
author Ko, Jooyeon
Lim, Hyun Kyoon
author_facet Ko, Jooyeon
Lim, Hyun Kyoon
author_sort Ko, Jooyeon
collection PubMed
description The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) was developed to evaluate the motor development of infants up to 18 months of age. We studied 252 infants in three groups (105 healthy preterm infants (HPI), 50 preterm infants with brain injury (PIBI), and 97 healthy full-term infants (HFI) under 18 months, corrected age (CoA)) using AIMS. No significant differences were found among HPI, PIBI, and HFI in infants less than 3 months old, yet significant differences were noted in positional scores (p < 0.05) and total scores for those four to six months of age and seven to nine months of age. A significant difference was also found in standing items for infants over 10 months (p < 0.05). After four months, there was a difference in motor development between preterm (with and without brain injury) and full-term infants. In particular, there was a significant difference in motor development between HPI and HFI and between PIBI and HFI at four to nine months, when motor skills developed explosively (p < 0.05). After four months, motor developmental delays (10th ≥) were observed in HPI and PIBI at rates of 26% and 45.8%, respectively. Midline supine development, a representative indicator of early motor development, was slower even in healthy preterm infants than in full-term infants. AIMS has a good resolution to discriminate preterm infants who are showing insufficient motor development from 4 months to 9 months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10001437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100014372023-03-11 Motor Development Comparison between Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Alberta Infant Motor Scale Ko, Jooyeon Lim, Hyun Kyoon Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) was developed to evaluate the motor development of infants up to 18 months of age. We studied 252 infants in three groups (105 healthy preterm infants (HPI), 50 preterm infants with brain injury (PIBI), and 97 healthy full-term infants (HFI) under 18 months, corrected age (CoA)) using AIMS. No significant differences were found among HPI, PIBI, and HFI in infants less than 3 months old, yet significant differences were noted in positional scores (p < 0.05) and total scores for those four to six months of age and seven to nine months of age. A significant difference was also found in standing items for infants over 10 months (p < 0.05). After four months, there was a difference in motor development between preterm (with and without brain injury) and full-term infants. In particular, there was a significant difference in motor development between HPI and HFI and between PIBI and HFI at four to nine months, when motor skills developed explosively (p < 0.05). After four months, motor developmental delays (10th ≥) were observed in HPI and PIBI at rates of 26% and 45.8%, respectively. Midline supine development, a representative indicator of early motor development, was slower even in healthy preterm infants than in full-term infants. AIMS has a good resolution to discriminate preterm infants who are showing insufficient motor development from 4 months to 9 months. MDPI 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10001437/ /pubmed/36900838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053819 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ko, Jooyeon
Lim, Hyun Kyoon
Motor Development Comparison between Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Alberta Infant Motor Scale
title Motor Development Comparison between Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Alberta Infant Motor Scale
title_full Motor Development Comparison between Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Alberta Infant Motor Scale
title_fullStr Motor Development Comparison between Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Alberta Infant Motor Scale
title_full_unstemmed Motor Development Comparison between Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Alberta Infant Motor Scale
title_short Motor Development Comparison between Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Alberta Infant Motor Scale
title_sort motor development comparison between preterm and full-term infants using alberta infant motor scale
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10001437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36900838
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053819
work_keys_str_mv AT kojooyeon motordevelopmentcomparisonbetweenpretermandfullterminfantsusingalbertainfantmotorscale
AT limhyunkyoon motordevelopmentcomparisonbetweenpretermandfullterminfantsusingalbertainfantmotorscale