Cargando…
Motor Development Comparison between Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Alberta Infant Motor Scale
The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) was developed to evaluate the motor development of infants up to 18 months of age. We studied 252 infants in three groups (105 healthy preterm infants (HPI), 50 preterm infants with brain injury (PIBI), and 97 healthy full-term infants (HFI) under 18 months, cor...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10001437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36900838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053819 |
_version_ | 1784904135977467904 |
---|---|
author | Ko, Jooyeon Lim, Hyun Kyoon |
author_facet | Ko, Jooyeon Lim, Hyun Kyoon |
author_sort | Ko, Jooyeon |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) was developed to evaluate the motor development of infants up to 18 months of age. We studied 252 infants in three groups (105 healthy preterm infants (HPI), 50 preterm infants with brain injury (PIBI), and 97 healthy full-term infants (HFI) under 18 months, corrected age (CoA)) using AIMS. No significant differences were found among HPI, PIBI, and HFI in infants less than 3 months old, yet significant differences were noted in positional scores (p < 0.05) and total scores for those four to six months of age and seven to nine months of age. A significant difference was also found in standing items for infants over 10 months (p < 0.05). After four months, there was a difference in motor development between preterm (with and without brain injury) and full-term infants. In particular, there was a significant difference in motor development between HPI and HFI and between PIBI and HFI at four to nine months, when motor skills developed explosively (p < 0.05). After four months, motor developmental delays (10th ≥) were observed in HPI and PIBI at rates of 26% and 45.8%, respectively. Midline supine development, a representative indicator of early motor development, was slower even in healthy preterm infants than in full-term infants. AIMS has a good resolution to discriminate preterm infants who are showing insufficient motor development from 4 months to 9 months. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10001437 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100014372023-03-11 Motor Development Comparison between Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Alberta Infant Motor Scale Ko, Jooyeon Lim, Hyun Kyoon Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) was developed to evaluate the motor development of infants up to 18 months of age. We studied 252 infants in three groups (105 healthy preterm infants (HPI), 50 preterm infants with brain injury (PIBI), and 97 healthy full-term infants (HFI) under 18 months, corrected age (CoA)) using AIMS. No significant differences were found among HPI, PIBI, and HFI in infants less than 3 months old, yet significant differences were noted in positional scores (p < 0.05) and total scores for those four to six months of age and seven to nine months of age. A significant difference was also found in standing items for infants over 10 months (p < 0.05). After four months, there was a difference in motor development between preterm (with and without brain injury) and full-term infants. In particular, there was a significant difference in motor development between HPI and HFI and between PIBI and HFI at four to nine months, when motor skills developed explosively (p < 0.05). After four months, motor developmental delays (10th ≥) were observed in HPI and PIBI at rates of 26% and 45.8%, respectively. Midline supine development, a representative indicator of early motor development, was slower even in healthy preterm infants than in full-term infants. AIMS has a good resolution to discriminate preterm infants who are showing insufficient motor development from 4 months to 9 months. MDPI 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10001437/ /pubmed/36900838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053819 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ko, Jooyeon Lim, Hyun Kyoon Motor Development Comparison between Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Alberta Infant Motor Scale |
title | Motor Development Comparison between Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Alberta Infant Motor Scale |
title_full | Motor Development Comparison between Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Alberta Infant Motor Scale |
title_fullStr | Motor Development Comparison between Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Alberta Infant Motor Scale |
title_full_unstemmed | Motor Development Comparison between Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Alberta Infant Motor Scale |
title_short | Motor Development Comparison between Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Alberta Infant Motor Scale |
title_sort | motor development comparison between preterm and full-term infants using alberta infant motor scale |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10001437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36900838 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053819 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kojooyeon motordevelopmentcomparisonbetweenpretermandfullterminfantsusingalbertainfantmotorscale AT limhyunkyoon motordevelopmentcomparisonbetweenpretermandfullterminfantsusingalbertainfantmotorscale |