Cargando…
Protective Role of Social Networks for the Well-Being of Persons with Disabilities: Results from a State-Wide Cross-Sectional Survey in Kerala, India
The current study presents the findings from a cross-sectional survey on social factors associated with the well-being of persons with disabilities (PWDs) in Kerala, India. We conducted a community-based survey across three geographical zones, North, Central, and South of Kerala state, between April...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10001646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36901222 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054213 |
_version_ | 1784904191415681024 |
---|---|
author | Devassy, Saju Madavanakadu Scaria, Lorane Yohannan, Shilpa V. Pathrose, Sunirose Ishnassery |
author_facet | Devassy, Saju Madavanakadu Scaria, Lorane Yohannan, Shilpa V. Pathrose, Sunirose Ishnassery |
author_sort | Devassy, Saju Madavanakadu |
collection | PubMed |
description | The current study presents the findings from a cross-sectional survey on social factors associated with the well-being of persons with disabilities (PWDs) in Kerala, India. We conducted a community-based survey across three geographical zones, North, Central, and South of Kerala state, between April and September 2021. We randomly selected two districts from each zone using a stratified sample method, followed by one local self-government from each of these six districts. Community health professionals identified individuals with disabilities, and researchers collected information on their social networks, service accessibility, well-being, and mental health. Overall, 244 (54.2%) participants had a physical disability, while 107 (23.78%) had an intellectual disability. The mean well-being score was 12.9 (S.D = 4.9, range = 5–20). Overall, 216 (48%) had poor social networks, 247 (55%) had issues regarding service accessibility, and 147 (33%) had depressive symptoms. Among the PWDs with issues with service access, 55% had limited social networks. A regression analysis revealed that social networks (b = 2.30, p = 0.000) and service accessibility (b = −2.09, p = 0.000) were associated with well-being. Social networks are more important than financial assistance because they facilitate better access to psycho-socioeconomic resources, a prerequisite for well-being. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10001646 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100016462023-03-11 Protective Role of Social Networks for the Well-Being of Persons with Disabilities: Results from a State-Wide Cross-Sectional Survey in Kerala, India Devassy, Saju Madavanakadu Scaria, Lorane Yohannan, Shilpa V. Pathrose, Sunirose Ishnassery Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The current study presents the findings from a cross-sectional survey on social factors associated with the well-being of persons with disabilities (PWDs) in Kerala, India. We conducted a community-based survey across three geographical zones, North, Central, and South of Kerala state, between April and September 2021. We randomly selected two districts from each zone using a stratified sample method, followed by one local self-government from each of these six districts. Community health professionals identified individuals with disabilities, and researchers collected information on their social networks, service accessibility, well-being, and mental health. Overall, 244 (54.2%) participants had a physical disability, while 107 (23.78%) had an intellectual disability. The mean well-being score was 12.9 (S.D = 4.9, range = 5–20). Overall, 216 (48%) had poor social networks, 247 (55%) had issues regarding service accessibility, and 147 (33%) had depressive symptoms. Among the PWDs with issues with service access, 55% had limited social networks. A regression analysis revealed that social networks (b = 2.30, p = 0.000) and service accessibility (b = −2.09, p = 0.000) were associated with well-being. Social networks are more important than financial assistance because they facilitate better access to psycho-socioeconomic resources, a prerequisite for well-being. MDPI 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10001646/ /pubmed/36901222 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054213 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Devassy, Saju Madavanakadu Scaria, Lorane Yohannan, Shilpa V. Pathrose, Sunirose Ishnassery Protective Role of Social Networks for the Well-Being of Persons with Disabilities: Results from a State-Wide Cross-Sectional Survey in Kerala, India |
title | Protective Role of Social Networks for the Well-Being of Persons with Disabilities: Results from a State-Wide Cross-Sectional Survey in Kerala, India |
title_full | Protective Role of Social Networks for the Well-Being of Persons with Disabilities: Results from a State-Wide Cross-Sectional Survey in Kerala, India |
title_fullStr | Protective Role of Social Networks for the Well-Being of Persons with Disabilities: Results from a State-Wide Cross-Sectional Survey in Kerala, India |
title_full_unstemmed | Protective Role of Social Networks for the Well-Being of Persons with Disabilities: Results from a State-Wide Cross-Sectional Survey in Kerala, India |
title_short | Protective Role of Social Networks for the Well-Being of Persons with Disabilities: Results from a State-Wide Cross-Sectional Survey in Kerala, India |
title_sort | protective role of social networks for the well-being of persons with disabilities: results from a state-wide cross-sectional survey in kerala, india |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10001646/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36901222 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054213 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devassysajumadavanakadu protectiveroleofsocialnetworksforthewellbeingofpersonswithdisabilitiesresultsfromastatewidecrosssectionalsurveyinkeralaindia AT scarialorane protectiveroleofsocialnetworksforthewellbeingofpersonswithdisabilitiesresultsfromastatewidecrosssectionalsurveyinkeralaindia AT yohannanshilpav protectiveroleofsocialnetworksforthewellbeingofpersonswithdisabilitiesresultsfromastatewidecrosssectionalsurveyinkeralaindia AT pathrosesuniroseishnassery protectiveroleofsocialnetworksforthewellbeingofpersonswithdisabilitiesresultsfromastatewidecrosssectionalsurveyinkeralaindia |