Cargando…

Protective Role of Social Networks for the Well-Being of Persons with Disabilities: Results from a State-Wide Cross-Sectional Survey in Kerala, India

The current study presents the findings from a cross-sectional survey on social factors associated with the well-being of persons with disabilities (PWDs) in Kerala, India. We conducted a community-based survey across three geographical zones, North, Central, and South of Kerala state, between April...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devassy, Saju Madavanakadu, Scaria, Lorane, Yohannan, Shilpa V., Pathrose, Sunirose Ishnassery
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10001646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36901222
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054213
_version_ 1784904191415681024
author Devassy, Saju Madavanakadu
Scaria, Lorane
Yohannan, Shilpa V.
Pathrose, Sunirose Ishnassery
author_facet Devassy, Saju Madavanakadu
Scaria, Lorane
Yohannan, Shilpa V.
Pathrose, Sunirose Ishnassery
author_sort Devassy, Saju Madavanakadu
collection PubMed
description The current study presents the findings from a cross-sectional survey on social factors associated with the well-being of persons with disabilities (PWDs) in Kerala, India. We conducted a community-based survey across three geographical zones, North, Central, and South of Kerala state, between April and September 2021. We randomly selected two districts from each zone using a stratified sample method, followed by one local self-government from each of these six districts. Community health professionals identified individuals with disabilities, and researchers collected information on their social networks, service accessibility, well-being, and mental health. Overall, 244 (54.2%) participants had a physical disability, while 107 (23.78%) had an intellectual disability. The mean well-being score was 12.9 (S.D = 4.9, range = 5–20). Overall, 216 (48%) had poor social networks, 247 (55%) had issues regarding service accessibility, and 147 (33%) had depressive symptoms. Among the PWDs with issues with service access, 55% had limited social networks. A regression analysis revealed that social networks (b = 2.30, p = 0.000) and service accessibility (b = −2.09, p = 0.000) were associated with well-being. Social networks are more important than financial assistance because they facilitate better access to psycho-socioeconomic resources, a prerequisite for well-being.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10001646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100016462023-03-11 Protective Role of Social Networks for the Well-Being of Persons with Disabilities: Results from a State-Wide Cross-Sectional Survey in Kerala, India Devassy, Saju Madavanakadu Scaria, Lorane Yohannan, Shilpa V. Pathrose, Sunirose Ishnassery Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The current study presents the findings from a cross-sectional survey on social factors associated with the well-being of persons with disabilities (PWDs) in Kerala, India. We conducted a community-based survey across three geographical zones, North, Central, and South of Kerala state, between April and September 2021. We randomly selected two districts from each zone using a stratified sample method, followed by one local self-government from each of these six districts. Community health professionals identified individuals with disabilities, and researchers collected information on their social networks, service accessibility, well-being, and mental health. Overall, 244 (54.2%) participants had a physical disability, while 107 (23.78%) had an intellectual disability. The mean well-being score was 12.9 (S.D = 4.9, range = 5–20). Overall, 216 (48%) had poor social networks, 247 (55%) had issues regarding service accessibility, and 147 (33%) had depressive symptoms. Among the PWDs with issues with service access, 55% had limited social networks. A regression analysis revealed that social networks (b = 2.30, p = 0.000) and service accessibility (b = −2.09, p = 0.000) were associated with well-being. Social networks are more important than financial assistance because they facilitate better access to psycho-socioeconomic resources, a prerequisite for well-being. MDPI 2023-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10001646/ /pubmed/36901222 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054213 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Devassy, Saju Madavanakadu
Scaria, Lorane
Yohannan, Shilpa V.
Pathrose, Sunirose Ishnassery
Protective Role of Social Networks for the Well-Being of Persons with Disabilities: Results from a State-Wide Cross-Sectional Survey in Kerala, India
title Protective Role of Social Networks for the Well-Being of Persons with Disabilities: Results from a State-Wide Cross-Sectional Survey in Kerala, India
title_full Protective Role of Social Networks for the Well-Being of Persons with Disabilities: Results from a State-Wide Cross-Sectional Survey in Kerala, India
title_fullStr Protective Role of Social Networks for the Well-Being of Persons with Disabilities: Results from a State-Wide Cross-Sectional Survey in Kerala, India
title_full_unstemmed Protective Role of Social Networks for the Well-Being of Persons with Disabilities: Results from a State-Wide Cross-Sectional Survey in Kerala, India
title_short Protective Role of Social Networks for the Well-Being of Persons with Disabilities: Results from a State-Wide Cross-Sectional Survey in Kerala, India
title_sort protective role of social networks for the well-being of persons with disabilities: results from a state-wide cross-sectional survey in kerala, india
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10001646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36901222
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054213
work_keys_str_mv AT devassysajumadavanakadu protectiveroleofsocialnetworksforthewellbeingofpersonswithdisabilitiesresultsfromastatewidecrosssectionalsurveyinkeralaindia
AT scarialorane protectiveroleofsocialnetworksforthewellbeingofpersonswithdisabilitiesresultsfromastatewidecrosssectionalsurveyinkeralaindia
AT yohannanshilpav protectiveroleofsocialnetworksforthewellbeingofpersonswithdisabilitiesresultsfromastatewidecrosssectionalsurveyinkeralaindia
AT pathrosesuniroseishnassery protectiveroleofsocialnetworksforthewellbeingofpersonswithdisabilitiesresultsfromastatewidecrosssectionalsurveyinkeralaindia