Cargando…

Can Modification with Urethane Derivatives or the Addition of an Anti-Hydrolysis Agent Influence the Hydrolytic Stability of Resin Dental Composite?

Due to the questionable durability of dental restorations, there is a need to increase the lifetime of composite restoration. The present study used diethylene glycol monomethacrylate/4,4′-methylenebis(cyclohexyl isocyanate) (DEGMMA/CHMDI), diethylene glycol monomethacrylate/isophorone diisocyanate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szczesio-Wlodarczyk, Agata, Barszczewska-Rybarek, Izabela M., Chrószcz-Porębska, Marta W., Kopacz, Karolina, Sokolowski, Jerzy, Bociong, Kinga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10001746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36901766
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24054336
_version_ 1784904217738084352
author Szczesio-Wlodarczyk, Agata
Barszczewska-Rybarek, Izabela M.
Chrószcz-Porębska, Marta W.
Kopacz, Karolina
Sokolowski, Jerzy
Bociong, Kinga
author_facet Szczesio-Wlodarczyk, Agata
Barszczewska-Rybarek, Izabela M.
Chrószcz-Porębska, Marta W.
Kopacz, Karolina
Sokolowski, Jerzy
Bociong, Kinga
author_sort Szczesio-Wlodarczyk, Agata
collection PubMed
description Due to the questionable durability of dental restorations, there is a need to increase the lifetime of composite restoration. The present study used diethylene glycol monomethacrylate/4,4′-methylenebis(cyclohexyl isocyanate) (DEGMMA/CHMDI), diethylene glycol monomethacrylate/isophorone diisocyanate (DEGMMA/IPDI) monomers, and bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide (CHINOX SA-1) as modifiers of a polymer matrix (40 wt% urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA), 40 wt% bisphenol A ethoxylateddimethacrylate (bis-EMA), and 20 wt% triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA)). Flexural strength (FS), diametral tensile strength (DTS), hardness (HV), sorption, and solubility were determined. To assess hydrolytic stability, the materials were tested before and after two aging methods (I-7500 cycles, 5 °C and 55 °C, water and 7 days, 60 °C, 0.1 M NaOH; II-5 days, 55 °C, water and 7 days, 60 °C, 0.1 M NaOH). The aging protocol resulted in no noticeable change (median values were the same as or higher than the control value) or a decrease in the DTS value from 4 to 28%, and a decrease in the FS value by 2 to 14%. The hardness values after aging were more than 60% lower than those of the controls. The used additives did not improve the initial (control) properties of the composite material. The addition of CHINOX SA-1 improved the hydrolytic stability of composites based on UDMA/bis-EMA/TEGDMA monomers, which could potentially extend the service life of the modified material. Extended studies are needed to confirm the possible use of CHINOX SA-1 as an antihydrolysis agent in dental composites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10001746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100017462023-03-11 Can Modification with Urethane Derivatives or the Addition of an Anti-Hydrolysis Agent Influence the Hydrolytic Stability of Resin Dental Composite? Szczesio-Wlodarczyk, Agata Barszczewska-Rybarek, Izabela M. Chrószcz-Porębska, Marta W. Kopacz, Karolina Sokolowski, Jerzy Bociong, Kinga Int J Mol Sci Article Due to the questionable durability of dental restorations, there is a need to increase the lifetime of composite restoration. The present study used diethylene glycol monomethacrylate/4,4′-methylenebis(cyclohexyl isocyanate) (DEGMMA/CHMDI), diethylene glycol monomethacrylate/isophorone diisocyanate (DEGMMA/IPDI) monomers, and bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)carbodiimide (CHINOX SA-1) as modifiers of a polymer matrix (40 wt% urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA), 40 wt% bisphenol A ethoxylateddimethacrylate (bis-EMA), and 20 wt% triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA)). Flexural strength (FS), diametral tensile strength (DTS), hardness (HV), sorption, and solubility were determined. To assess hydrolytic stability, the materials were tested before and after two aging methods (I-7500 cycles, 5 °C and 55 °C, water and 7 days, 60 °C, 0.1 M NaOH; II-5 days, 55 °C, water and 7 days, 60 °C, 0.1 M NaOH). The aging protocol resulted in no noticeable change (median values were the same as or higher than the control value) or a decrease in the DTS value from 4 to 28%, and a decrease in the FS value by 2 to 14%. The hardness values after aging were more than 60% lower than those of the controls. The used additives did not improve the initial (control) properties of the composite material. The addition of CHINOX SA-1 improved the hydrolytic stability of composites based on UDMA/bis-EMA/TEGDMA monomers, which could potentially extend the service life of the modified material. Extended studies are needed to confirm the possible use of CHINOX SA-1 as an antihydrolysis agent in dental composites. MDPI 2023-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10001746/ /pubmed/36901766 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24054336 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Szczesio-Wlodarczyk, Agata
Barszczewska-Rybarek, Izabela M.
Chrószcz-Porębska, Marta W.
Kopacz, Karolina
Sokolowski, Jerzy
Bociong, Kinga
Can Modification with Urethane Derivatives or the Addition of an Anti-Hydrolysis Agent Influence the Hydrolytic Stability of Resin Dental Composite?
title Can Modification with Urethane Derivatives or the Addition of an Anti-Hydrolysis Agent Influence the Hydrolytic Stability of Resin Dental Composite?
title_full Can Modification with Urethane Derivatives or the Addition of an Anti-Hydrolysis Agent Influence the Hydrolytic Stability of Resin Dental Composite?
title_fullStr Can Modification with Urethane Derivatives or the Addition of an Anti-Hydrolysis Agent Influence the Hydrolytic Stability of Resin Dental Composite?
title_full_unstemmed Can Modification with Urethane Derivatives or the Addition of an Anti-Hydrolysis Agent Influence the Hydrolytic Stability of Resin Dental Composite?
title_short Can Modification with Urethane Derivatives or the Addition of an Anti-Hydrolysis Agent Influence the Hydrolytic Stability of Resin Dental Composite?
title_sort can modification with urethane derivatives or the addition of an anti-hydrolysis agent influence the hydrolytic stability of resin dental composite?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10001746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36901766
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24054336
work_keys_str_mv AT szczesiowlodarczykagata canmodificationwithurethanederivativesortheadditionofanantihydrolysisagentinfluencethehydrolyticstabilityofresindentalcomposite
AT barszczewskarybarekizabelam canmodificationwithurethanederivativesortheadditionofanantihydrolysisagentinfluencethehydrolyticstabilityofresindentalcomposite
AT chroszczporebskamartaw canmodificationwithurethanederivativesortheadditionofanantihydrolysisagentinfluencethehydrolyticstabilityofresindentalcomposite
AT kopaczkarolina canmodificationwithurethanederivativesortheadditionofanantihydrolysisagentinfluencethehydrolyticstabilityofresindentalcomposite
AT sokolowskijerzy canmodificationwithurethanederivativesortheadditionofanantihydrolysisagentinfluencethehydrolyticstabilityofresindentalcomposite
AT bociongkinga canmodificationwithurethanederivativesortheadditionofanantihydrolysisagentinfluencethehydrolyticstabilityofresindentalcomposite