Cargando…

Telerehabilitation as a Therapeutic Exercise Tool versus Face-to-Face Physiotherapy: A Systematic Review

Digital physiotherapy, often referred to as “Telerehabilitation”, consists of applying rehabilitation using telecommunication technologies. The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic exercise when it is telematically prescribed. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, SportDi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muñoz-Tomás, Mª Teresa, Burillo-Lafuente, Mario, Vicente-Parra, Araceli, Sanz-Rubio, Mª Concepción, Suarez-Serrano, Carmen, Marcén-Román, Yolanda, Franco-Sierra, Mª Ángeles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10002129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36901375
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054358
_version_ 1784904315000848384
author Muñoz-Tomás, Mª Teresa
Burillo-Lafuente, Mario
Vicente-Parra, Araceli
Sanz-Rubio, Mª Concepción
Suarez-Serrano, Carmen
Marcén-Román, Yolanda
Franco-Sierra, Mª Ángeles
author_facet Muñoz-Tomás, Mª Teresa
Burillo-Lafuente, Mario
Vicente-Parra, Araceli
Sanz-Rubio, Mª Concepción
Suarez-Serrano, Carmen
Marcén-Román, Yolanda
Franco-Sierra, Mª Ángeles
author_sort Muñoz-Tomás, Mª Teresa
collection PubMed
description Digital physiotherapy, often referred to as “Telerehabilitation”, consists of applying rehabilitation using telecommunication technologies. The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic exercise when it is telematically prescribed. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, SportDiscus and PEDro (30 December 2022). The results were obtained by entering a combination of MeSH or Emtree terms with keywords related to telerehabilitation and exercise therapy. RCTs on patients over 18 years and two groups were included, one working with therapeutic exercise through telerehabilitation and one working with conventional physiotherapy group. Results: a total of 779 works were found. However, after applying the inclusion criteria, only 11 were selected. Telerehabilitation is most frequently used to treat musculoskeletal, cardiac and neurological pathologies. The preferred telerehabilitation tools are videoconferencing systems, telemonitoring and online platforms. Exercise programs ranged from 10 to 30 min and were similar in both intervention and control groups. In all the studies, results proved to be similar for telerehabilitation and face-to-face rehabilitation in both groups when measuring functionality, quality of life and satisfaction. Conclusion: this review generally concludes that intervention through telerehabilitation programs is as feasible and efficient as conventional physiotherapy in terms of functionality level and quality of life. In addition, telerehabilitation shows high levels of patients’ satisfaction and adherence, being values equivalent to traditional rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10002129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100021292023-03-11 Telerehabilitation as a Therapeutic Exercise Tool versus Face-to-Face Physiotherapy: A Systematic Review Muñoz-Tomás, Mª Teresa Burillo-Lafuente, Mario Vicente-Parra, Araceli Sanz-Rubio, Mª Concepción Suarez-Serrano, Carmen Marcén-Román, Yolanda Franco-Sierra, Mª Ángeles Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Digital physiotherapy, often referred to as “Telerehabilitation”, consists of applying rehabilitation using telecommunication technologies. The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic exercise when it is telematically prescribed. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, SportDiscus and PEDro (30 December 2022). The results were obtained by entering a combination of MeSH or Emtree terms with keywords related to telerehabilitation and exercise therapy. RCTs on patients over 18 years and two groups were included, one working with therapeutic exercise through telerehabilitation and one working with conventional physiotherapy group. Results: a total of 779 works were found. However, after applying the inclusion criteria, only 11 were selected. Telerehabilitation is most frequently used to treat musculoskeletal, cardiac and neurological pathologies. The preferred telerehabilitation tools are videoconferencing systems, telemonitoring and online platforms. Exercise programs ranged from 10 to 30 min and were similar in both intervention and control groups. In all the studies, results proved to be similar for telerehabilitation and face-to-face rehabilitation in both groups when measuring functionality, quality of life and satisfaction. Conclusion: this review generally concludes that intervention through telerehabilitation programs is as feasible and efficient as conventional physiotherapy in terms of functionality level and quality of life. In addition, telerehabilitation shows high levels of patients’ satisfaction and adherence, being values equivalent to traditional rehabilitation. MDPI 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10002129/ /pubmed/36901375 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054358 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Muñoz-Tomás, Mª Teresa
Burillo-Lafuente, Mario
Vicente-Parra, Araceli
Sanz-Rubio, Mª Concepción
Suarez-Serrano, Carmen
Marcén-Román, Yolanda
Franco-Sierra, Mª Ángeles
Telerehabilitation as a Therapeutic Exercise Tool versus Face-to-Face Physiotherapy: A Systematic Review
title Telerehabilitation as a Therapeutic Exercise Tool versus Face-to-Face Physiotherapy: A Systematic Review
title_full Telerehabilitation as a Therapeutic Exercise Tool versus Face-to-Face Physiotherapy: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Telerehabilitation as a Therapeutic Exercise Tool versus Face-to-Face Physiotherapy: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Telerehabilitation as a Therapeutic Exercise Tool versus Face-to-Face Physiotherapy: A Systematic Review
title_short Telerehabilitation as a Therapeutic Exercise Tool versus Face-to-Face Physiotherapy: A Systematic Review
title_sort telerehabilitation as a therapeutic exercise tool versus face-to-face physiotherapy: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10002129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36901375
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054358
work_keys_str_mv AT munoztomasmateresa telerehabilitationasatherapeuticexercisetoolversusfacetofacephysiotherapyasystematicreview
AT burillolafuentemario telerehabilitationasatherapeuticexercisetoolversusfacetofacephysiotherapyasystematicreview
AT vicenteparraaraceli telerehabilitationasatherapeuticexercisetoolversusfacetofacephysiotherapyasystematicreview
AT sanzrubiomaconcepcion telerehabilitationasatherapeuticexercisetoolversusfacetofacephysiotherapyasystematicreview
AT suarezserranocarmen telerehabilitationasatherapeuticexercisetoolversusfacetofacephysiotherapyasystematicreview
AT marcenromanyolanda telerehabilitationasatherapeuticexercisetoolversusfacetofacephysiotherapyasystematicreview
AT francosierramaangeles telerehabilitationasatherapeuticexercisetoolversusfacetofacephysiotherapyasystematicreview