Cargando…
Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities
This article studies the influence of the Carbon Trading Pilot Policy (CTPP) on carbon emissions by constructing the balanced panel data from 2003 to 2020 for 285 cities in China above the prefecture level. Difference-in-Difference (DID) method is used to test the influence and the mechanism. (1) Th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10002236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36901431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054421 |
_version_ | 1784904341033844736 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Xuehui Zhang, Jiaping Bi, Lehua Jiang, Yiming |
author_facet | Yang, Xuehui Zhang, Jiaping Bi, Lehua Jiang, Yiming |
author_sort | Yang, Xuehui |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article studies the influence of the Carbon Trading Pilot Policy (CTPP) on carbon emissions by constructing the balanced panel data from 2003 to 2020 for 285 cities in China above the prefecture level. Difference-in-Difference (DID) method is used to test the influence and the mechanism. (1) The findings suggested that CTPP has dramatically reduced China’s carbon emissions by 6.21%. The parallel trend test shows that the premise of DID is reliable. (2) A variety of robustness tests, such as the instrumental variable method for endogeneity, Propensity Score Matching (PSM) for sample selection bias, variable substitution, time–bandwidth change, and exclusion of policy intervention, show that the conclusion is still robust. (3) The mediation mechanism test indicates that CTPP can promote the reduction in carbon emissions by promoting Green Consumption Transformation (GCT), improving Ecological Efficiency (EE), and promoting Industrial Structure Upgrading (ISU). GCT contributes the most, followed by EE and ISU. (4) The analysis of the heterogeneity reveals that CTPP has a greater effect on carbon emission reduction in central and peripheral cities in China. This study provides policy implications for China and similar developing countries in the face of carbon reduction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10002236 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100022362023-03-11 Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities Yang, Xuehui Zhang, Jiaping Bi, Lehua Jiang, Yiming Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This article studies the influence of the Carbon Trading Pilot Policy (CTPP) on carbon emissions by constructing the balanced panel data from 2003 to 2020 for 285 cities in China above the prefecture level. Difference-in-Difference (DID) method is used to test the influence and the mechanism. (1) The findings suggested that CTPP has dramatically reduced China’s carbon emissions by 6.21%. The parallel trend test shows that the premise of DID is reliable. (2) A variety of robustness tests, such as the instrumental variable method for endogeneity, Propensity Score Matching (PSM) for sample selection bias, variable substitution, time–bandwidth change, and exclusion of policy intervention, show that the conclusion is still robust. (3) The mediation mechanism test indicates that CTPP can promote the reduction in carbon emissions by promoting Green Consumption Transformation (GCT), improving Ecological Efficiency (EE), and promoting Industrial Structure Upgrading (ISU). GCT contributes the most, followed by EE and ISU. (4) The analysis of the heterogeneity reveals that CTPP has a greater effect on carbon emission reduction in central and peripheral cities in China. This study provides policy implications for China and similar developing countries in the face of carbon reduction. MDPI 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10002236/ /pubmed/36901431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054421 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Yang, Xuehui Zhang, Jiaping Bi, Lehua Jiang, Yiming Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities |
title | Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities |
title_full | Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities |
title_fullStr | Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities |
title_full_unstemmed | Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities |
title_short | Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities |
title_sort | does china’s carbon trading pilot policy reduce carbon emissions? empirical analysis from 285 cities |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10002236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36901431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054421 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangxuehui doeschinascarbontradingpilotpolicyreducecarbonemissionsempiricalanalysisfrom285cities AT zhangjiaping doeschinascarbontradingpilotpolicyreducecarbonemissionsempiricalanalysisfrom285cities AT bilehua doeschinascarbontradingpilotpolicyreducecarbonemissionsempiricalanalysisfrom285cities AT jiangyiming doeschinascarbontradingpilotpolicyreducecarbonemissionsempiricalanalysisfrom285cities |