Cargando…

Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities

This article studies the influence of the Carbon Trading Pilot Policy (CTPP) on carbon emissions by constructing the balanced panel data from 2003 to 2020 for 285 cities in China above the prefecture level. Difference-in-Difference (DID) method is used to test the influence and the mechanism. (1) Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Xuehui, Zhang, Jiaping, Bi, Lehua, Jiang, Yiming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10002236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36901431
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054421
_version_ 1784904341033844736
author Yang, Xuehui
Zhang, Jiaping
Bi, Lehua
Jiang, Yiming
author_facet Yang, Xuehui
Zhang, Jiaping
Bi, Lehua
Jiang, Yiming
author_sort Yang, Xuehui
collection PubMed
description This article studies the influence of the Carbon Trading Pilot Policy (CTPP) on carbon emissions by constructing the balanced panel data from 2003 to 2020 for 285 cities in China above the prefecture level. Difference-in-Difference (DID) method is used to test the influence and the mechanism. (1) The findings suggested that CTPP has dramatically reduced China’s carbon emissions by 6.21%. The parallel trend test shows that the premise of DID is reliable. (2) A variety of robustness tests, such as the instrumental variable method for endogeneity, Propensity Score Matching (PSM) for sample selection bias, variable substitution, time–bandwidth change, and exclusion of policy intervention, show that the conclusion is still robust. (3) The mediation mechanism test indicates that CTPP can promote the reduction in carbon emissions by promoting Green Consumption Transformation (GCT), improving Ecological Efficiency (EE), and promoting Industrial Structure Upgrading (ISU). GCT contributes the most, followed by EE and ISU. (4) The analysis of the heterogeneity reveals that CTPP has a greater effect on carbon emission reduction in central and peripheral cities in China. This study provides policy implications for China and similar developing countries in the face of carbon reduction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10002236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100022362023-03-11 Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities Yang, Xuehui Zhang, Jiaping Bi, Lehua Jiang, Yiming Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This article studies the influence of the Carbon Trading Pilot Policy (CTPP) on carbon emissions by constructing the balanced panel data from 2003 to 2020 for 285 cities in China above the prefecture level. Difference-in-Difference (DID) method is used to test the influence and the mechanism. (1) The findings suggested that CTPP has dramatically reduced China’s carbon emissions by 6.21%. The parallel trend test shows that the premise of DID is reliable. (2) A variety of robustness tests, such as the instrumental variable method for endogeneity, Propensity Score Matching (PSM) for sample selection bias, variable substitution, time–bandwidth change, and exclusion of policy intervention, show that the conclusion is still robust. (3) The mediation mechanism test indicates that CTPP can promote the reduction in carbon emissions by promoting Green Consumption Transformation (GCT), improving Ecological Efficiency (EE), and promoting Industrial Structure Upgrading (ISU). GCT contributes the most, followed by EE and ISU. (4) The analysis of the heterogeneity reveals that CTPP has a greater effect on carbon emission reduction in central and peripheral cities in China. This study provides policy implications for China and similar developing countries in the face of carbon reduction. MDPI 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10002236/ /pubmed/36901431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054421 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yang, Xuehui
Zhang, Jiaping
Bi, Lehua
Jiang, Yiming
Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities
title Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities
title_full Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities
title_fullStr Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities
title_full_unstemmed Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities
title_short Does China’s Carbon Trading Pilot Policy Reduce Carbon Emissions? Empirical Analysis from 285 Cities
title_sort does china’s carbon trading pilot policy reduce carbon emissions? empirical analysis from 285 cities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10002236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36901431
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054421
work_keys_str_mv AT yangxuehui doeschinascarbontradingpilotpolicyreducecarbonemissionsempiricalanalysisfrom285cities
AT zhangjiaping doeschinascarbontradingpilotpolicyreducecarbonemissionsempiricalanalysisfrom285cities
AT bilehua doeschinascarbontradingpilotpolicyreducecarbonemissionsempiricalanalysisfrom285cities
AT jiangyiming doeschinascarbontradingpilotpolicyreducecarbonemissionsempiricalanalysisfrom285cities