Cargando…
Predicting ‘Brainage’ in the Developmental Period using Structural MRI, Morphometric Similarity, and Machine Learning
Brain development is regularly studied using structural MRI. Recently, studies have used a combination of statistical learning and large-scale imaging databases of healthy-children to predict an individual’s age from structural MRI. This data-driven, ‘brainage’ typically differs from the subjects ch...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Journal Experts
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10002817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36909598 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2583936/v1 |
_version_ | 1784904466519031808 |
---|---|
author | Griffiths-King, Daniel J. Wood, Amanda G. Novak, Jan |
author_facet | Griffiths-King, Daniel J. Wood, Amanda G. Novak, Jan |
author_sort | Griffiths-King, Daniel J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Brain development is regularly studied using structural MRI. Recently, studies have used a combination of statistical learning and large-scale imaging databases of healthy-children to predict an individual’s age from structural MRI. This data-driven, ‘brainage’ typically differs from the subjects chronological age, with this difference a potential measure of individual difference. Few studies have leveraged higher-order or connectomic representations of structural MRI data for this brainage approach. We leveraged morphometric similarity as a network-level approach to structural MRI to generate predictive models of age. We benchmarked these novel brain-age approaches using morphometric similarity against more typical, single feature (i.e. cortical thickness) approaches. We showed that these novel methods did not outperform cortical thickness or cortical volume measures. All models were significantly biased by age, but robust to motion confounds. The main results show that, whilst morphometric similarity mapping may be a novel way to leverage additional information from a T1-weighted structural MRI beyond individual features, in the context of a brain-age framework, morphometric similarity does not explain more variance than individual structural features. Morphometric similarity as a network-level approach to structural MRI may be poorly positioned to study individual differences in brain development in healthy individuals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10002817 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Journal Experts |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100028172023-03-11 Predicting ‘Brainage’ in the Developmental Period using Structural MRI, Morphometric Similarity, and Machine Learning Griffiths-King, Daniel J. Wood, Amanda G. Novak, Jan Res Sq Article Brain development is regularly studied using structural MRI. Recently, studies have used a combination of statistical learning and large-scale imaging databases of healthy-children to predict an individual’s age from structural MRI. This data-driven, ‘brainage’ typically differs from the subjects chronological age, with this difference a potential measure of individual difference. Few studies have leveraged higher-order or connectomic representations of structural MRI data for this brainage approach. We leveraged morphometric similarity as a network-level approach to structural MRI to generate predictive models of age. We benchmarked these novel brain-age approaches using morphometric similarity against more typical, single feature (i.e. cortical thickness) approaches. We showed that these novel methods did not outperform cortical thickness or cortical volume measures. All models were significantly biased by age, but robust to motion confounds. The main results show that, whilst morphometric similarity mapping may be a novel way to leverage additional information from a T1-weighted structural MRI beyond individual features, in the context of a brain-age framework, morphometric similarity does not explain more variance than individual structural features. Morphometric similarity as a network-level approach to structural MRI may be poorly positioned to study individual differences in brain development in healthy individuals. American Journal Experts 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10002817/ /pubmed/36909598 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2583936/v1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. |
spellingShingle | Article Griffiths-King, Daniel J. Wood, Amanda G. Novak, Jan Predicting ‘Brainage’ in the Developmental Period using Structural MRI, Morphometric Similarity, and Machine Learning |
title | Predicting ‘Brainage’ in the Developmental Period using Structural MRI, Morphometric Similarity, and Machine Learning |
title_full | Predicting ‘Brainage’ in the Developmental Period using Structural MRI, Morphometric Similarity, and Machine Learning |
title_fullStr | Predicting ‘Brainage’ in the Developmental Period using Structural MRI, Morphometric Similarity, and Machine Learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting ‘Brainage’ in the Developmental Period using Structural MRI, Morphometric Similarity, and Machine Learning |
title_short | Predicting ‘Brainage’ in the Developmental Period using Structural MRI, Morphometric Similarity, and Machine Learning |
title_sort | predicting ‘brainage’ in the developmental period using structural mri, morphometric similarity, and machine learning |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10002817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36909598 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2583936/v1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT griffithskingdanielj predictingbrainageinthedevelopmentalperiodusingstructuralmrimorphometricsimilarityandmachinelearning AT woodamandag predictingbrainageinthedevelopmentalperiodusingstructuralmrimorphometricsimilarityandmachinelearning AT novakjan predictingbrainageinthedevelopmentalperiodusingstructuralmrimorphometricsimilarityandmachinelearning |