Cargando…
Implementation Evaluation of a Teledermatology Virtual Clinic at an Academic Medical Center
BACKGROUND: Teledermatology (TD) is an evidence-based practice that may increase access to dermatologic care. We sought to evaluate implementation of TD at four Duke primary care practices. METHODS: We implemented a hybrid TD program where trained primary care providers (PCPs) sent referrals with cl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Journal Experts
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10002841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36909611 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2558425/v1 |
_version_ | 1784904472164564992 |
---|---|
author | Kheterpal, Meenal Borre, Ethan D. Nicholas, Matilda W. Cooner, Edward W. Phinney, Donna Gagnon, Kelly Zullig, Leah L. King, Heather A. Malcolm, Elizabeth J. Chen, Suephy C. |
author_facet | Kheterpal, Meenal Borre, Ethan D. Nicholas, Matilda W. Cooner, Edward W. Phinney, Donna Gagnon, Kelly Zullig, Leah L. King, Heather A. Malcolm, Elizabeth J. Chen, Suephy C. |
author_sort | Kheterpal, Meenal |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Teledermatology (TD) is an evidence-based practice that may increase access to dermatologic care. We sought to evaluate implementation of TD at four Duke primary care practices. METHODS: We implemented a hybrid TD program where trained primary care providers (PCPs) sent referrals with clinical and dermatoscopic images to dermatology. Patients were seen by dermatologists over video visit within days, and dermatologists managed the patient plan. We evaluated implementation using the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework using electronic health record data. Implementation barriers and facilitators were collected through surveys (n = 24 PCPs, n = 10 dermatologists, n = 10 dermatology residents). RESULTS: At four PCP clinics throughout 9/1/2021-4/30/2022 there were 218 TD referrals. Video visits occurred on average 7.5 days after referral and 18/18 patients completing the post-visit survey were satisfied. Adoption varied between clinics, with one placing 22% of all dermatology referrals as TD and another placing 2%. The primary PCP barriers to TD were time burdens, lack of fit in clinic flow, and discomfort with image taking. Top-endorsed potential facilitating interventions included allowing for rash referrals without dermoscopy and assurance for clinical evaluation within 3 days. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing TD process fit into PCP clinic flow and reducing time burdens may increase PCP uptake of TD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10002841 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Journal Experts |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100028412023-03-11 Implementation Evaluation of a Teledermatology Virtual Clinic at an Academic Medical Center Kheterpal, Meenal Borre, Ethan D. Nicholas, Matilda W. Cooner, Edward W. Phinney, Donna Gagnon, Kelly Zullig, Leah L. King, Heather A. Malcolm, Elizabeth J. Chen, Suephy C. Res Sq Article BACKGROUND: Teledermatology (TD) is an evidence-based practice that may increase access to dermatologic care. We sought to evaluate implementation of TD at four Duke primary care practices. METHODS: We implemented a hybrid TD program where trained primary care providers (PCPs) sent referrals with clinical and dermatoscopic images to dermatology. Patients were seen by dermatologists over video visit within days, and dermatologists managed the patient plan. We evaluated implementation using the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework using electronic health record data. Implementation barriers and facilitators were collected through surveys (n = 24 PCPs, n = 10 dermatologists, n = 10 dermatology residents). RESULTS: At four PCP clinics throughout 9/1/2021-4/30/2022 there were 218 TD referrals. Video visits occurred on average 7.5 days after referral and 18/18 patients completing the post-visit survey were satisfied. Adoption varied between clinics, with one placing 22% of all dermatology referrals as TD and another placing 2%. The primary PCP barriers to TD were time burdens, lack of fit in clinic flow, and discomfort with image taking. Top-endorsed potential facilitating interventions included allowing for rash referrals without dermoscopy and assurance for clinical evaluation within 3 days. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing TD process fit into PCP clinic flow and reducing time burdens may increase PCP uptake of TD. American Journal Experts 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10002841/ /pubmed/36909611 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2558425/v1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. |
spellingShingle | Article Kheterpal, Meenal Borre, Ethan D. Nicholas, Matilda W. Cooner, Edward W. Phinney, Donna Gagnon, Kelly Zullig, Leah L. King, Heather A. Malcolm, Elizabeth J. Chen, Suephy C. Implementation Evaluation of a Teledermatology Virtual Clinic at an Academic Medical Center |
title | Implementation Evaluation of a Teledermatology Virtual Clinic at an Academic Medical Center |
title_full | Implementation Evaluation of a Teledermatology Virtual Clinic at an Academic Medical Center |
title_fullStr | Implementation Evaluation of a Teledermatology Virtual Clinic at an Academic Medical Center |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation Evaluation of a Teledermatology Virtual Clinic at an Academic Medical Center |
title_short | Implementation Evaluation of a Teledermatology Virtual Clinic at an Academic Medical Center |
title_sort | implementation evaluation of a teledermatology virtual clinic at an academic medical center |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10002841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36909611 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2558425/v1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kheterpalmeenal implementationevaluationofateledermatologyvirtualclinicatanacademicmedicalcenter AT borreethand implementationevaluationofateledermatologyvirtualclinicatanacademicmedicalcenter AT nicholasmatildaw implementationevaluationofateledermatologyvirtualclinicatanacademicmedicalcenter AT cooneredwardw implementationevaluationofateledermatologyvirtualclinicatanacademicmedicalcenter AT phinneydonna implementationevaluationofateledermatologyvirtualclinicatanacademicmedicalcenter AT gagnonkelly implementationevaluationofateledermatologyvirtualclinicatanacademicmedicalcenter AT zulligleahl implementationevaluationofateledermatologyvirtualclinicatanacademicmedicalcenter AT kingheathera implementationevaluationofateledermatologyvirtualclinicatanacademicmedicalcenter AT malcolmelizabethj implementationevaluationofateledermatologyvirtualclinicatanacademicmedicalcenter AT chensuephyc implementationevaluationofateledermatologyvirtualclinicatanacademicmedicalcenter |