Cargando…
Comparison of Adverse Events between Isolated Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Combined Catheter Ablation
(1) Background: This study aimed to investigate the effect of an additional catheter ablation (CA) procedure on the risk of post-procedure adverse events during CA combined with left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). (2) Methods: From July 2017 to February 2022, data from 361 patients with atrial fib...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902610 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051824 |
_version_ | 1784904551897235456 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yan Yang, Jing Liu, Qian Wu, Jinglan Yin, Lei Lv, Jing You, Ling Zhang, Yanan Wang, Lianxia Zhao, Yanlei Hou, Qian Jing, Weilin Xie, Ruiqin |
author_facet | Zhang, Yan Yang, Jing Liu, Qian Wu, Jinglan Yin, Lei Lv, Jing You, Ling Zhang, Yanan Wang, Lianxia Zhao, Yanlei Hou, Qian Jing, Weilin Xie, Ruiqin |
author_sort | Zhang, Yan |
collection | PubMed |
description | (1) Background: This study aimed to investigate the effect of an additional catheter ablation (CA) procedure on the risk of post-procedure adverse events during CA combined with left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). (2) Methods: From July 2017 to February 2022, data from 361 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent LAAC at our center were analyzed retrospectively. The adverse events were compared between CA + LAAC and LAAC-only groups. (3) Results: The incidence of device-related thrombus (DRT) and embolic events was significantly lower in the CA + LAAC group than in the LAAC-only group (p = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively). A logistic regression analysis revealed that the combined procedure served as a protective factor for DRT (OR = 0.09; 95% confidence interval: 0.01–0.89; p = 0.04). Based on a Cox regression analysis, the risk of embolism marginally increased in patients aged ≥65 years (HR = 7.49, 95% CI: 0.85–66.22 p = 0.07), whereas the combined procedure was found to be a protective factor (HR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.07–0.87 p = 0.03). Further subgroup and interaction analyses revealed similar results. (4) Conclusions: The combined procedure may be associated with a lower rate of post-procedure DRT and embolization without a higher occurrence of other adverse events after LAAC. A risk-score-based prediction model was conducted, showing a good prediction performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10003199 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100031992023-03-11 Comparison of Adverse Events between Isolated Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Combined Catheter Ablation Zhang, Yan Yang, Jing Liu, Qian Wu, Jinglan Yin, Lei Lv, Jing You, Ling Zhang, Yanan Wang, Lianxia Zhao, Yanlei Hou, Qian Jing, Weilin Xie, Ruiqin J Clin Med Article (1) Background: This study aimed to investigate the effect of an additional catheter ablation (CA) procedure on the risk of post-procedure adverse events during CA combined with left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). (2) Methods: From July 2017 to February 2022, data from 361 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent LAAC at our center were analyzed retrospectively. The adverse events were compared between CA + LAAC and LAAC-only groups. (3) Results: The incidence of device-related thrombus (DRT) and embolic events was significantly lower in the CA + LAAC group than in the LAAC-only group (p = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively). A logistic regression analysis revealed that the combined procedure served as a protective factor for DRT (OR = 0.09; 95% confidence interval: 0.01–0.89; p = 0.04). Based on a Cox regression analysis, the risk of embolism marginally increased in patients aged ≥65 years (HR = 7.49, 95% CI: 0.85–66.22 p = 0.07), whereas the combined procedure was found to be a protective factor (HR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.07–0.87 p = 0.03). Further subgroup and interaction analyses revealed similar results. (4) Conclusions: The combined procedure may be associated with a lower rate of post-procedure DRT and embolization without a higher occurrence of other adverse events after LAAC. A risk-score-based prediction model was conducted, showing a good prediction performance. MDPI 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10003199/ /pubmed/36902610 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051824 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Yan Yang, Jing Liu, Qian Wu, Jinglan Yin, Lei Lv, Jing You, Ling Zhang, Yanan Wang, Lianxia Zhao, Yanlei Hou, Qian Jing, Weilin Xie, Ruiqin Comparison of Adverse Events between Isolated Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Combined Catheter Ablation |
title | Comparison of Adverse Events between Isolated Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Combined Catheter Ablation |
title_full | Comparison of Adverse Events between Isolated Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Combined Catheter Ablation |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Adverse Events between Isolated Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Combined Catheter Ablation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Adverse Events between Isolated Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Combined Catheter Ablation |
title_short | Comparison of Adverse Events between Isolated Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Combined Catheter Ablation |
title_sort | comparison of adverse events between isolated left atrial appendage closure and combined catheter ablation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902610 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051824 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyan comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation AT yangjing comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation AT liuqian comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation AT wujinglan comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation AT yinlei comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation AT lvjing comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation AT youling comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation AT zhangyanan comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation AT wanglianxia comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation AT zhaoyanlei comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation AT houqian comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation AT jingweilin comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation AT xieruiqin comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation |