Cargando…

Comparison of Adverse Events between Isolated Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Combined Catheter Ablation

(1) Background: This study aimed to investigate the effect of an additional catheter ablation (CA) procedure on the risk of post-procedure adverse events during CA combined with left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). (2) Methods: From July 2017 to February 2022, data from 361 patients with atrial fib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yan, Yang, Jing, Liu, Qian, Wu, Jinglan, Yin, Lei, Lv, Jing, You, Ling, Zhang, Yanan, Wang, Lianxia, Zhao, Yanlei, Hou, Qian, Jing, Weilin, Xie, Ruiqin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902610
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051824
_version_ 1784904551897235456
author Zhang, Yan
Yang, Jing
Liu, Qian
Wu, Jinglan
Yin, Lei
Lv, Jing
You, Ling
Zhang, Yanan
Wang, Lianxia
Zhao, Yanlei
Hou, Qian
Jing, Weilin
Xie, Ruiqin
author_facet Zhang, Yan
Yang, Jing
Liu, Qian
Wu, Jinglan
Yin, Lei
Lv, Jing
You, Ling
Zhang, Yanan
Wang, Lianxia
Zhao, Yanlei
Hou, Qian
Jing, Weilin
Xie, Ruiqin
author_sort Zhang, Yan
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: This study aimed to investigate the effect of an additional catheter ablation (CA) procedure on the risk of post-procedure adverse events during CA combined with left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). (2) Methods: From July 2017 to February 2022, data from 361 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent LAAC at our center were analyzed retrospectively. The adverse events were compared between CA + LAAC and LAAC-only groups. (3) Results: The incidence of device-related thrombus (DRT) and embolic events was significantly lower in the CA + LAAC group than in the LAAC-only group (p = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively). A logistic regression analysis revealed that the combined procedure served as a protective factor for DRT (OR = 0.09; 95% confidence interval: 0.01–0.89; p = 0.04). Based on a Cox regression analysis, the risk of embolism marginally increased in patients aged ≥65 years (HR = 7.49, 95% CI: 0.85–66.22 p = 0.07), whereas the combined procedure was found to be a protective factor (HR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.07–0.87 p = 0.03). Further subgroup and interaction analyses revealed similar results. (4) Conclusions: The combined procedure may be associated with a lower rate of post-procedure DRT and embolization without a higher occurrence of other adverse events after LAAC. A risk-score-based prediction model was conducted, showing a good prediction performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10003199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100031992023-03-11 Comparison of Adverse Events between Isolated Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Combined Catheter Ablation Zhang, Yan Yang, Jing Liu, Qian Wu, Jinglan Yin, Lei Lv, Jing You, Ling Zhang, Yanan Wang, Lianxia Zhao, Yanlei Hou, Qian Jing, Weilin Xie, Ruiqin J Clin Med Article (1) Background: This study aimed to investigate the effect of an additional catheter ablation (CA) procedure on the risk of post-procedure adverse events during CA combined with left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). (2) Methods: From July 2017 to February 2022, data from 361 patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent LAAC at our center were analyzed retrospectively. The adverse events were compared between CA + LAAC and LAAC-only groups. (3) Results: The incidence of device-related thrombus (DRT) and embolic events was significantly lower in the CA + LAAC group than in the LAAC-only group (p = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively). A logistic regression analysis revealed that the combined procedure served as a protective factor for DRT (OR = 0.09; 95% confidence interval: 0.01–0.89; p = 0.04). Based on a Cox regression analysis, the risk of embolism marginally increased in patients aged ≥65 years (HR = 7.49, 95% CI: 0.85–66.22 p = 0.07), whereas the combined procedure was found to be a protective factor (HR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.07–0.87 p = 0.03). Further subgroup and interaction analyses revealed similar results. (4) Conclusions: The combined procedure may be associated with a lower rate of post-procedure DRT and embolization without a higher occurrence of other adverse events after LAAC. A risk-score-based prediction model was conducted, showing a good prediction performance. MDPI 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10003199/ /pubmed/36902610 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051824 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Yan
Yang, Jing
Liu, Qian
Wu, Jinglan
Yin, Lei
Lv, Jing
You, Ling
Zhang, Yanan
Wang, Lianxia
Zhao, Yanlei
Hou, Qian
Jing, Weilin
Xie, Ruiqin
Comparison of Adverse Events between Isolated Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Combined Catheter Ablation
title Comparison of Adverse Events between Isolated Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Combined Catheter Ablation
title_full Comparison of Adverse Events between Isolated Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Combined Catheter Ablation
title_fullStr Comparison of Adverse Events between Isolated Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Combined Catheter Ablation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Adverse Events between Isolated Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Combined Catheter Ablation
title_short Comparison of Adverse Events between Isolated Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Combined Catheter Ablation
title_sort comparison of adverse events between isolated left atrial appendage closure and combined catheter ablation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902610
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051824
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyan comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation
AT yangjing comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation
AT liuqian comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation
AT wujinglan comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation
AT yinlei comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation
AT lvjing comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation
AT youling comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation
AT zhangyanan comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation
AT wanglianxia comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation
AT zhaoyanlei comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation
AT houqian comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation
AT jingweilin comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation
AT xieruiqin comparisonofadverseeventsbetweenisolatedleftatrialappendageclosureandcombinedcatheterablation