Cargando…

Combined LTP Sublingual and Oral Immunotherapy in LTP Syndrome: Efficacy and Safety

Introduction: SLIT for the treatment of plant food allergies has been demonstrated to be safe but less effective than OIT, but the latter is associated with more adverse reactions. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new protocol starting with SLIT-peach followed by OIT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin Iglesias, Maria Aranzazu, Garcia Rodriguez, Rosa, Palacios Cañas, Alberto, Meneses Sotomayor, Jaime Vinicio, Clar Castello, Miriam, Feo Brito, Francisco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902611
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051823
_version_ 1784904556310691840
author Martin Iglesias, Maria Aranzazu
Garcia Rodriguez, Rosa
Palacios Cañas, Alberto
Meneses Sotomayor, Jaime Vinicio
Clar Castello, Miriam
Feo Brito, Francisco
author_facet Martin Iglesias, Maria Aranzazu
Garcia Rodriguez, Rosa
Palacios Cañas, Alberto
Meneses Sotomayor, Jaime Vinicio
Clar Castello, Miriam
Feo Brito, Francisco
author_sort Martin Iglesias, Maria Aranzazu
collection PubMed
description Introduction: SLIT for the treatment of plant food allergies has been demonstrated to be safe but less effective than OIT, but the latter is associated with more adverse reactions. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new protocol starting with SLIT-peach followed by OIT with commercial peach juice in patients with LTP syndrome. Methods: This was a prospective, noncontrolled, open study on patients with LTP syndrome who are not sensitized to storage proteins. SLIT peach ALK was followed by OIT with Granini(®) peach juice after 40 days of the SLIT maintenance phase. At home, the Granini(®) juice dose was progressively increased during the 42 days until reaching 200 ml. After achieving the maximum dose, an open oral food challenge was carried out with the food that had caused the most severe reaction. If negative, the patient was instructed to progressively introduce the foods that were avoided before starting immunotherapy at home. Patients were reviewed 1 month later. The quality-of-life questionnaire FAQLQ-AF was completed at the beginning of the study and one month after the final challenge. Results: Forty-five patients were included, most of them with LTP anaphylaxis. Peach SLIT was well tolerated in 80.5%, and OIT with Granini(®) was well tolerated in 85%, with no severe adverse reactions. The final provocation was successful in 39/45 (86.6%). One month after the final provocation, 42/45 (93.3%) patients had no dietary restrictions. FAQLA-AF was significantly reduced. Conclusions: This combination of peach SLIT and OIT with commercial peach juice provides a new, fast, effective, and safe immunotherapy option for selected patients with LTP syndrome who are not allergic to storage proteins, improving their quality of life. This study suggests that cross-desensitization relative to the nsLTPs of several plant foods can be achieved by using Prup3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10003230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100032302023-03-11 Combined LTP Sublingual and Oral Immunotherapy in LTP Syndrome: Efficacy and Safety Martin Iglesias, Maria Aranzazu Garcia Rodriguez, Rosa Palacios Cañas, Alberto Meneses Sotomayor, Jaime Vinicio Clar Castello, Miriam Feo Brito, Francisco J Clin Med Article Introduction: SLIT for the treatment of plant food allergies has been demonstrated to be safe but less effective than OIT, but the latter is associated with more adverse reactions. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new protocol starting with SLIT-peach followed by OIT with commercial peach juice in patients with LTP syndrome. Methods: This was a prospective, noncontrolled, open study on patients with LTP syndrome who are not sensitized to storage proteins. SLIT peach ALK was followed by OIT with Granini(®) peach juice after 40 days of the SLIT maintenance phase. At home, the Granini(®) juice dose was progressively increased during the 42 days until reaching 200 ml. After achieving the maximum dose, an open oral food challenge was carried out with the food that had caused the most severe reaction. If negative, the patient was instructed to progressively introduce the foods that were avoided before starting immunotherapy at home. Patients were reviewed 1 month later. The quality-of-life questionnaire FAQLQ-AF was completed at the beginning of the study and one month after the final challenge. Results: Forty-five patients were included, most of them with LTP anaphylaxis. Peach SLIT was well tolerated in 80.5%, and OIT with Granini(®) was well tolerated in 85%, with no severe adverse reactions. The final provocation was successful in 39/45 (86.6%). One month after the final provocation, 42/45 (93.3%) patients had no dietary restrictions. FAQLA-AF was significantly reduced. Conclusions: This combination of peach SLIT and OIT with commercial peach juice provides a new, fast, effective, and safe immunotherapy option for selected patients with LTP syndrome who are not allergic to storage proteins, improving their quality of life. This study suggests that cross-desensitization relative to the nsLTPs of several plant foods can be achieved by using Prup3. MDPI 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10003230/ /pubmed/36902611 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051823 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Martin Iglesias, Maria Aranzazu
Garcia Rodriguez, Rosa
Palacios Cañas, Alberto
Meneses Sotomayor, Jaime Vinicio
Clar Castello, Miriam
Feo Brito, Francisco
Combined LTP Sublingual and Oral Immunotherapy in LTP Syndrome: Efficacy and Safety
title Combined LTP Sublingual and Oral Immunotherapy in LTP Syndrome: Efficacy and Safety
title_full Combined LTP Sublingual and Oral Immunotherapy in LTP Syndrome: Efficacy and Safety
title_fullStr Combined LTP Sublingual and Oral Immunotherapy in LTP Syndrome: Efficacy and Safety
title_full_unstemmed Combined LTP Sublingual and Oral Immunotherapy in LTP Syndrome: Efficacy and Safety
title_short Combined LTP Sublingual and Oral Immunotherapy in LTP Syndrome: Efficacy and Safety
title_sort combined ltp sublingual and oral immunotherapy in ltp syndrome: efficacy and safety
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902611
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051823
work_keys_str_mv AT martiniglesiasmariaaranzazu combinedltpsublingualandoralimmunotherapyinltpsyndromeefficacyandsafety
AT garciarodriguezrosa combinedltpsublingualandoralimmunotherapyinltpsyndromeefficacyandsafety
AT palacioscanasalberto combinedltpsublingualandoralimmunotherapyinltpsyndromeefficacyandsafety
AT menesessotomayorjaimevinicio combinedltpsublingualandoralimmunotherapyinltpsyndromeefficacyandsafety
AT clarcastellomiriam combinedltpsublingualandoralimmunotherapyinltpsyndromeefficacyandsafety
AT feobritofrancisco combinedltpsublingualandoralimmunotherapyinltpsyndromeefficacyandsafety