Cargando…
Morphological assessment of the surface profile, mesiodistal diameter, and contact tightness of Class II composite restorations using three matrix systems: An in vitro study
CONTEXT: Sectional matrices and contact rings are valuable aids to establish proximal contact tightness in Class II composite restorations. AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the proximal contact area in Class II composite restorations using three matrix systems based on morphological analysis, mesio...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908728 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_403_22 |
_version_ | 1784904568178475008 |
---|---|
author | Kumari, Suchitra Raghu, Ramya Shetty, Ashish Rajasekhara, Subhashini Padmini, Souparnika Divakaran |
author_facet | Kumari, Suchitra Raghu, Ramya Shetty, Ashish Rajasekhara, Subhashini Padmini, Souparnika Divakaran |
author_sort | Kumari, Suchitra |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Sectional matrices and contact rings are valuable aids to establish proximal contact tightness in Class II composite restorations. AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the proximal contact area in Class II composite restorations using three matrix systems based on morphological analysis, mesiodistal (M-D) diameter and contact tightness. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A standardized DO cavity was prepared in 30 plastic molar teeth. They were randomly divided into three groups (n = 10) and restored using Tetric N-Ceram composite material and three matrix systems – Saddle matrix, Palodent system, and Palodent Plus system. The quality of proximal contacts was assessed by measuring the maximum M-D diameter of the restored teeth using a digital caliper; the tightness of the proximal contact area using Unifloss and a standardized metal blade (30 μm). Qualitative assessment of contact morphology was done by visual means while quantitative assessment of contour was done using Medit scanner superimposing method and ExoCAD software. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: One-way ANOVA test was used to compare the mean M-D diameter (in mm) in the occlusal third, middle third, and the proximal contact area between the three groups. Chi-square test was used to compare the proximal contact area tightness using the passage of Unifloss. The buccolingual and occluso-gingival morphology was also compared among the three groups. The level of significance (P value) was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: For the occlusal and middle third, significantly larger diameters were achieved with the Palodent Plus system than with the Saddle matrix. More flat contours were seen in the case of the Saddle matrix than in the case of the Palodent system while the Palodent Plus system exhibited a minimal depth of concavity as determined by three-dimensional imaging of the contact morphology. CONCLUSIONS: Palodent Plus and Palodent matrix systems established superior contacts and contours than the Saddle matrix. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10003278 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100032782023-03-11 Morphological assessment of the surface profile, mesiodistal diameter, and contact tightness of Class II composite restorations using three matrix systems: An in vitro study Kumari, Suchitra Raghu, Ramya Shetty, Ashish Rajasekhara, Subhashini Padmini, Souparnika Divakaran J Conserv Dent Original Article CONTEXT: Sectional matrices and contact rings are valuable aids to establish proximal contact tightness in Class II composite restorations. AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the proximal contact area in Class II composite restorations using three matrix systems based on morphological analysis, mesiodistal (M-D) diameter and contact tightness. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A standardized DO cavity was prepared in 30 plastic molar teeth. They were randomly divided into three groups (n = 10) and restored using Tetric N-Ceram composite material and three matrix systems – Saddle matrix, Palodent system, and Palodent Plus system. The quality of proximal contacts was assessed by measuring the maximum M-D diameter of the restored teeth using a digital caliper; the tightness of the proximal contact area using Unifloss and a standardized metal blade (30 μm). Qualitative assessment of contact morphology was done by visual means while quantitative assessment of contour was done using Medit scanner superimposing method and ExoCAD software. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: One-way ANOVA test was used to compare the mean M-D diameter (in mm) in the occlusal third, middle third, and the proximal contact area between the three groups. Chi-square test was used to compare the proximal contact area tightness using the passage of Unifloss. The buccolingual and occluso-gingival morphology was also compared among the three groups. The level of significance (P value) was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: For the occlusal and middle third, significantly larger diameters were achieved with the Palodent Plus system than with the Saddle matrix. More flat contours were seen in the case of the Saddle matrix than in the case of the Palodent system while the Palodent Plus system exhibited a minimal depth of concavity as determined by three-dimensional imaging of the contact morphology. CONCLUSIONS: Palodent Plus and Palodent matrix systems established superior contacts and contours than the Saddle matrix. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2022-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10003278/ /pubmed/36908728 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_403_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kumari, Suchitra Raghu, Ramya Shetty, Ashish Rajasekhara, Subhashini Padmini, Souparnika Divakaran Morphological assessment of the surface profile, mesiodistal diameter, and contact tightness of Class II composite restorations using three matrix systems: An in vitro study |
title | Morphological assessment of the surface profile, mesiodistal diameter, and contact tightness of Class II composite restorations using three matrix systems: An in vitro study |
title_full | Morphological assessment of the surface profile, mesiodistal diameter, and contact tightness of Class II composite restorations using three matrix systems: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Morphological assessment of the surface profile, mesiodistal diameter, and contact tightness of Class II composite restorations using three matrix systems: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Morphological assessment of the surface profile, mesiodistal diameter, and contact tightness of Class II composite restorations using three matrix systems: An in vitro study |
title_short | Morphological assessment of the surface profile, mesiodistal diameter, and contact tightness of Class II composite restorations using three matrix systems: An in vitro study |
title_sort | morphological assessment of the surface profile, mesiodistal diameter, and contact tightness of class ii composite restorations using three matrix systems: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908728 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_403_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumarisuchitra morphologicalassessmentofthesurfaceprofilemesiodistaldiameterandcontacttightnessofclassiicompositerestorationsusingthreematrixsystemsaninvitrostudy AT raghuramya morphologicalassessmentofthesurfaceprofilemesiodistaldiameterandcontacttightnessofclassiicompositerestorationsusingthreematrixsystemsaninvitrostudy AT shettyashish morphologicalassessmentofthesurfaceprofilemesiodistaldiameterandcontacttightnessofclassiicompositerestorationsusingthreematrixsystemsaninvitrostudy AT rajasekharasubhashini morphologicalassessmentofthesurfaceprofilemesiodistaldiameterandcontacttightnessofclassiicompositerestorationsusingthreematrixsystemsaninvitrostudy AT padminisouparnikadivakaran morphologicalassessmentofthesurfaceprofilemesiodistaldiameterandcontacttightnessofclassiicompositerestorationsusingthreematrixsystemsaninvitrostudy |