Cargando…

Sonographic Flow-Mediated Dilation Imaging versus Electronic EndoCheck Flow-Mediated Slowing by VICORDER in Pregnant Women—A Comparison of Two Methods to Evaluate Vascular Function in Pregnancy

The evaluation of endothelial function is gaining interest and importance during pregnancy, since the impaired adaptation in early pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk in preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. To standardize the risk assessment and to implement the evaluation of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lößner, Charlotte, Multhaup, Anna, Lehmann, Thomas, Schleußner, Ekkehard, Groten, Tanja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902503
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051719
_version_ 1784904638416289792
author Lößner, Charlotte
Multhaup, Anna
Lehmann, Thomas
Schleußner, Ekkehard
Groten, Tanja
author_facet Lößner, Charlotte
Multhaup, Anna
Lehmann, Thomas
Schleußner, Ekkehard
Groten, Tanja
author_sort Lößner, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description The evaluation of endothelial function is gaining interest and importance during pregnancy, since the impaired adaptation in early pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk in preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. To standardize the risk assessment and to implement the evaluation of vascular function in routine pregnancy care, a suitable, accurate and easy to use method is needed. Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery assessed by ultrasound is considered to be the gold standard for measuring the vascular endothelial function. The challenges of the FMD measurement have so far prevented its introduction into clinical routine. The VICORDER(®) device allows an automated determination of the flow-mediated slowing (FMS). The equivalence of FMD and FMS has not yet been proven in pregnant women. We collected data of 20 pregnant women randomly and consecutively while they presented for a vascular function assessment in our hospital. The gestational age at investigation was between 22 and 32 weeks of gestation, three had preexisting hypertensive pregnancy disease and three were twin pregnancies. The results for FMD or FMS below 11.3% were considered to be abnormal. Comparing FMD to FMS results in our cohort revealed a convergence in 9/9 cases, indicating normal endothelial function (specificity of 100%) and a sensitivity of 72.7%. In conclusion, we verify that the FMS measurement is a convenient, automated and operator-independent test method of endothelial function in pregnant women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10003587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100035872023-03-11 Sonographic Flow-Mediated Dilation Imaging versus Electronic EndoCheck Flow-Mediated Slowing by VICORDER in Pregnant Women—A Comparison of Two Methods to Evaluate Vascular Function in Pregnancy Lößner, Charlotte Multhaup, Anna Lehmann, Thomas Schleußner, Ekkehard Groten, Tanja J Clin Med Article The evaluation of endothelial function is gaining interest and importance during pregnancy, since the impaired adaptation in early pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk in preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. To standardize the risk assessment and to implement the evaluation of vascular function in routine pregnancy care, a suitable, accurate and easy to use method is needed. Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery assessed by ultrasound is considered to be the gold standard for measuring the vascular endothelial function. The challenges of the FMD measurement have so far prevented its introduction into clinical routine. The VICORDER(®) device allows an automated determination of the flow-mediated slowing (FMS). The equivalence of FMD and FMS has not yet been proven in pregnant women. We collected data of 20 pregnant women randomly and consecutively while they presented for a vascular function assessment in our hospital. The gestational age at investigation was between 22 and 32 weeks of gestation, three had preexisting hypertensive pregnancy disease and three were twin pregnancies. The results for FMD or FMS below 11.3% were considered to be abnormal. Comparing FMD to FMS results in our cohort revealed a convergence in 9/9 cases, indicating normal endothelial function (specificity of 100%) and a sensitivity of 72.7%. In conclusion, we verify that the FMS measurement is a convenient, automated and operator-independent test method of endothelial function in pregnant women. MDPI 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10003587/ /pubmed/36902503 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051719 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lößner, Charlotte
Multhaup, Anna
Lehmann, Thomas
Schleußner, Ekkehard
Groten, Tanja
Sonographic Flow-Mediated Dilation Imaging versus Electronic EndoCheck Flow-Mediated Slowing by VICORDER in Pregnant Women—A Comparison of Two Methods to Evaluate Vascular Function in Pregnancy
title Sonographic Flow-Mediated Dilation Imaging versus Electronic EndoCheck Flow-Mediated Slowing by VICORDER in Pregnant Women—A Comparison of Two Methods to Evaluate Vascular Function in Pregnancy
title_full Sonographic Flow-Mediated Dilation Imaging versus Electronic EndoCheck Flow-Mediated Slowing by VICORDER in Pregnant Women—A Comparison of Two Methods to Evaluate Vascular Function in Pregnancy
title_fullStr Sonographic Flow-Mediated Dilation Imaging versus Electronic EndoCheck Flow-Mediated Slowing by VICORDER in Pregnant Women—A Comparison of Two Methods to Evaluate Vascular Function in Pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Sonographic Flow-Mediated Dilation Imaging versus Electronic EndoCheck Flow-Mediated Slowing by VICORDER in Pregnant Women—A Comparison of Two Methods to Evaluate Vascular Function in Pregnancy
title_short Sonographic Flow-Mediated Dilation Imaging versus Electronic EndoCheck Flow-Mediated Slowing by VICORDER in Pregnant Women—A Comparison of Two Methods to Evaluate Vascular Function in Pregnancy
title_sort sonographic flow-mediated dilation imaging versus electronic endocheck flow-mediated slowing by vicorder in pregnant women—a comparison of two methods to evaluate vascular function in pregnancy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902503
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051719
work_keys_str_mv AT loßnercharlotte sonographicflowmediateddilationimagingversuselectronicendocheckflowmediatedslowingbyvicorderinpregnantwomenacomparisonoftwomethodstoevaluatevascularfunctioninpregnancy
AT multhaupanna sonographicflowmediateddilationimagingversuselectronicendocheckflowmediatedslowingbyvicorderinpregnantwomenacomparisonoftwomethodstoevaluatevascularfunctioninpregnancy
AT lehmannthomas sonographicflowmediateddilationimagingversuselectronicendocheckflowmediatedslowingbyvicorderinpregnantwomenacomparisonoftwomethodstoevaluatevascularfunctioninpregnancy
AT schleußnerekkehard sonographicflowmediateddilationimagingversuselectronicendocheckflowmediatedslowingbyvicorderinpregnantwomenacomparisonoftwomethodstoevaluatevascularfunctioninpregnancy
AT grotentanja sonographicflowmediateddilationimagingversuselectronicendocheckflowmediatedslowingbyvicorderinpregnantwomenacomparisonoftwomethodstoevaluatevascularfunctioninpregnancy