Cargando…
Comparison of propofol infusion rate required to abolish swallowing or pedal withdrawal reflexes in dogs
In a prospective, randomized, experimental non-blinded study, the continuous infusions rates of propofol required to prevent swallowing (P-SR) or pedal withdrawal reflex (P-WR) were evaluated in healthy premedicated dogs. Dogs were randomly assigned to one of two treatments at weekly intervals. Foll...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Urmia University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36909683 http://dx.doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2021.537306.3220 |
_version_ | 1784904640845840384 |
---|---|
author | Khojasteh, Keyvan Vesal, Nasser |
author_facet | Khojasteh, Keyvan Vesal, Nasser |
author_sort | Khojasteh, Keyvan |
collection | PubMed |
description | In a prospective, randomized, experimental non-blinded study, the continuous infusions rates of propofol required to prevent swallowing (P-SR) or pedal withdrawal reflex (P-WR) were evaluated in healthy premedicated dogs. Dogs were randomly assigned to one of two treatments at weekly intervals. Following premedication with a combination of acepromazine and methadone, anesthesia was induced with propofol (4.00 mg kg(-1 )per min) and was maintained for 90 min. The propofol infusion rate was increased or decreased by 0.05 mg kg(-1 )per min based on positive or negative swallowing (P-SR) or pedal withdrawal reflexes (P-WR). Propofol induction doses were 2.12 ± 0.43 mg kg(-1) (P-SR) and 2.14 ± 0.31 mg kg(-1) (P-WR), which were not significantly different. The mean (±SD) propofol infusion rate was significantly higher for P-WR (0.26 ± 0.10 mg kg(-1 )per min) when compared to P-SR (0.22 ± 0.12 mg kg(-1 )per min). During the last 30 min, the mean propofol infusion rates were 0.09 ± 0.02 and 0.18 ± 0.03 mg kg(-1 )per min for P-SR and P-WR, respectively. There were no significant differences between treatments with respect to heart rate (HR), respiratory rate, arterial blood pressure, end-tidal CO(2) partial pressure, hemoglobin oxygen saturation, partial pressures of oxygen or pH. Transient apnea lasting up to three minutes was observed in three dogs with each treatment. Propofol infusion rate of 0.22 ± 0.12 mg kg(-1 )per min can be used in premedicated dogs requiring tracheal intubation and undergoing mechanical ventilation, non-painful procedures or painful procedures with local anesthetic techniques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10003597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Urmia University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100035972023-03-11 Comparison of propofol infusion rate required to abolish swallowing or pedal withdrawal reflexes in dogs Khojasteh, Keyvan Vesal, Nasser Vet Res Forum Original Article In a prospective, randomized, experimental non-blinded study, the continuous infusions rates of propofol required to prevent swallowing (P-SR) or pedal withdrawal reflex (P-WR) were evaluated in healthy premedicated dogs. Dogs were randomly assigned to one of two treatments at weekly intervals. Following premedication with a combination of acepromazine and methadone, anesthesia was induced with propofol (4.00 mg kg(-1 )per min) and was maintained for 90 min. The propofol infusion rate was increased or decreased by 0.05 mg kg(-1 )per min based on positive or negative swallowing (P-SR) or pedal withdrawal reflexes (P-WR). Propofol induction doses were 2.12 ± 0.43 mg kg(-1) (P-SR) and 2.14 ± 0.31 mg kg(-1) (P-WR), which were not significantly different. The mean (±SD) propofol infusion rate was significantly higher for P-WR (0.26 ± 0.10 mg kg(-1 )per min) when compared to P-SR (0.22 ± 0.12 mg kg(-1 )per min). During the last 30 min, the mean propofol infusion rates were 0.09 ± 0.02 and 0.18 ± 0.03 mg kg(-1 )per min for P-SR and P-WR, respectively. There were no significant differences between treatments with respect to heart rate (HR), respiratory rate, arterial blood pressure, end-tidal CO(2) partial pressure, hemoglobin oxygen saturation, partial pressures of oxygen or pH. Transient apnea lasting up to three minutes was observed in three dogs with each treatment. Propofol infusion rate of 0.22 ± 0.12 mg kg(-1 )per min can be used in premedicated dogs requiring tracheal intubation and undergoing mechanical ventilation, non-painful procedures or painful procedures with local anesthetic techniques. Urmia University Press 2023 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10003597/ /pubmed/36909683 http://dx.doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2021.537306.3220 Text en © 2023 Urmia University. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Khojasteh, Keyvan Vesal, Nasser Comparison of propofol infusion rate required to abolish swallowing or pedal withdrawal reflexes in dogs |
title | Comparison of propofol infusion rate required to abolish swallowing or pedal withdrawal reflexes in dogs |
title_full | Comparison of propofol infusion rate required to abolish swallowing or pedal withdrawal reflexes in dogs |
title_fullStr | Comparison of propofol infusion rate required to abolish swallowing or pedal withdrawal reflexes in dogs |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of propofol infusion rate required to abolish swallowing or pedal withdrawal reflexes in dogs |
title_short | Comparison of propofol infusion rate required to abolish swallowing or pedal withdrawal reflexes in dogs |
title_sort | comparison of propofol infusion rate required to abolish swallowing or pedal withdrawal reflexes in dogs |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36909683 http://dx.doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2021.537306.3220 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khojastehkeyvan comparisonofpropofolinfusionraterequiredtoabolishswallowingorpedalwithdrawalreflexesindogs AT vesalnasser comparisonofpropofolinfusionraterequiredtoabolishswallowingorpedalwithdrawalreflexesindogs |