Cargando…

Understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: Recommendations for a path forward

Increasing calls within the field of implementation science (IS) research seek to promote active engagement of diverse and often disenfranchised stakeholder voices to increase buy-in, fidelity, outcome relevance, and sustainment of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Including such voices requires cult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pérez Jolles, Mónica, Willging, Cathleen E., Stadnick, Nicole A., Crable, Erika L., Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca, Hawkins, Jemma, Aarons, Gregory A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908715
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.942658
_version_ 1784904692581531648
author Pérez Jolles, Mónica
Willging, Cathleen E.
Stadnick, Nicole A.
Crable, Erika L.
Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca
Hawkins, Jemma
Aarons, Gregory A.
author_facet Pérez Jolles, Mónica
Willging, Cathleen E.
Stadnick, Nicole A.
Crable, Erika L.
Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca
Hawkins, Jemma
Aarons, Gregory A.
author_sort Pérez Jolles, Mónica
collection PubMed
description Increasing calls within the field of implementation science (IS) research seek to promote active engagement of diverse and often disenfranchised stakeholder voices to increase buy-in, fidelity, outcome relevance, and sustainment of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Including such voices requires cultural humility and the integration of multiple perspectives and values among organizations, groups, and individuals. However, the IS field lacks guidance for researchers on structuring collaborative approaches to promote a co-created process (i.e., synergistic approach to goal attainment). We contend that improved operationalization of co-created implementation collaborations is critical to sparking synergy and addressing differentials based on power, privilege, knowledge, and access to resources among stakeholders. These differentials can undermine future implementation and sustainment efforts if not addressed early in the research effort. An insufficient understanding of the guiding principles of co-created implementation collaborations may limit the scientific value of evaluation processes, and researchers' ability to replicate outcomes. We propose a perspective foregrounded in the concept of co-creation to guide the structuring of implementation collaboratives through five principles. We offer three case examples informed by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) Framework to illustrate the application of these co-creation principles. Lastly, we offer recommendations for promoting co-creation in IS research moving forward.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10003830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100038302023-03-10 Understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: Recommendations for a path forward Pérez Jolles, Mónica Willging, Cathleen E. Stadnick, Nicole A. Crable, Erika L. Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca Hawkins, Jemma Aarons, Gregory A. Front Health Serv Health Services Increasing calls within the field of implementation science (IS) research seek to promote active engagement of diverse and often disenfranchised stakeholder voices to increase buy-in, fidelity, outcome relevance, and sustainment of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Including such voices requires cultural humility and the integration of multiple perspectives and values among organizations, groups, and individuals. However, the IS field lacks guidance for researchers on structuring collaborative approaches to promote a co-created process (i.e., synergistic approach to goal attainment). We contend that improved operationalization of co-created implementation collaborations is critical to sparking synergy and addressing differentials based on power, privilege, knowledge, and access to resources among stakeholders. These differentials can undermine future implementation and sustainment efforts if not addressed early in the research effort. An insufficient understanding of the guiding principles of co-created implementation collaborations may limit the scientific value of evaluation processes, and researchers' ability to replicate outcomes. We propose a perspective foregrounded in the concept of co-creation to guide the structuring of implementation collaboratives through five principles. We offer three case examples informed by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) Framework to illustrate the application of these co-creation principles. Lastly, we offer recommendations for promoting co-creation in IS research moving forward. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10003830/ /pubmed/36908715 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.942658 Text en Copyright © 2022 Pérez Jolles, Willging, Stadnick, Crable, Lengnick-Hall, Hawkins and Aarons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Health Services
Pérez Jolles, Mónica
Willging, Cathleen E.
Stadnick, Nicole A.
Crable, Erika L.
Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca
Hawkins, Jemma
Aarons, Gregory A.
Understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: Recommendations for a path forward
title Understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: Recommendations for a path forward
title_full Understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: Recommendations for a path forward
title_fullStr Understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: Recommendations for a path forward
title_full_unstemmed Understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: Recommendations for a path forward
title_short Understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: Recommendations for a path forward
title_sort understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: recommendations for a path forward
topic Health Services
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908715
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.942658
work_keys_str_mv AT perezjollesmonica understandingimplementationresearchcollaborationsfromacocreationlensrecommendationsforapathforward
AT willgingcathleene understandingimplementationresearchcollaborationsfromacocreationlensrecommendationsforapathforward
AT stadnicknicolea understandingimplementationresearchcollaborationsfromacocreationlensrecommendationsforapathforward
AT crableerikal understandingimplementationresearchcollaborationsfromacocreationlensrecommendationsforapathforward
AT lengnickhallrebecca understandingimplementationresearchcollaborationsfromacocreationlensrecommendationsforapathforward
AT hawkinsjemma understandingimplementationresearchcollaborationsfromacocreationlensrecommendationsforapathforward
AT aaronsgregorya understandingimplementationresearchcollaborationsfromacocreationlensrecommendationsforapathforward