Cargando…
Understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: Recommendations for a path forward
Increasing calls within the field of implementation science (IS) research seek to promote active engagement of diverse and often disenfranchised stakeholder voices to increase buy-in, fidelity, outcome relevance, and sustainment of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Including such voices requires cult...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908715 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.942658 |
_version_ | 1784904692581531648 |
---|---|
author | Pérez Jolles, Mónica Willging, Cathleen E. Stadnick, Nicole A. Crable, Erika L. Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca Hawkins, Jemma Aarons, Gregory A. |
author_facet | Pérez Jolles, Mónica Willging, Cathleen E. Stadnick, Nicole A. Crable, Erika L. Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca Hawkins, Jemma Aarons, Gregory A. |
author_sort | Pérez Jolles, Mónica |
collection | PubMed |
description | Increasing calls within the field of implementation science (IS) research seek to promote active engagement of diverse and often disenfranchised stakeholder voices to increase buy-in, fidelity, outcome relevance, and sustainment of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Including such voices requires cultural humility and the integration of multiple perspectives and values among organizations, groups, and individuals. However, the IS field lacks guidance for researchers on structuring collaborative approaches to promote a co-created process (i.e., synergistic approach to goal attainment). We contend that improved operationalization of co-created implementation collaborations is critical to sparking synergy and addressing differentials based on power, privilege, knowledge, and access to resources among stakeholders. These differentials can undermine future implementation and sustainment efforts if not addressed early in the research effort. An insufficient understanding of the guiding principles of co-created implementation collaborations may limit the scientific value of evaluation processes, and researchers' ability to replicate outcomes. We propose a perspective foregrounded in the concept of co-creation to guide the structuring of implementation collaboratives through five principles. We offer three case examples informed by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) Framework to illustrate the application of these co-creation principles. Lastly, we offer recommendations for promoting co-creation in IS research moving forward. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10003830 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100038302023-03-10 Understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: Recommendations for a path forward Pérez Jolles, Mónica Willging, Cathleen E. Stadnick, Nicole A. Crable, Erika L. Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca Hawkins, Jemma Aarons, Gregory A. Front Health Serv Health Services Increasing calls within the field of implementation science (IS) research seek to promote active engagement of diverse and often disenfranchised stakeholder voices to increase buy-in, fidelity, outcome relevance, and sustainment of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Including such voices requires cultural humility and the integration of multiple perspectives and values among organizations, groups, and individuals. However, the IS field lacks guidance for researchers on structuring collaborative approaches to promote a co-created process (i.e., synergistic approach to goal attainment). We contend that improved operationalization of co-created implementation collaborations is critical to sparking synergy and addressing differentials based on power, privilege, knowledge, and access to resources among stakeholders. These differentials can undermine future implementation and sustainment efforts if not addressed early in the research effort. An insufficient understanding of the guiding principles of co-created implementation collaborations may limit the scientific value of evaluation processes, and researchers' ability to replicate outcomes. We propose a perspective foregrounded in the concept of co-creation to guide the structuring of implementation collaboratives through five principles. We offer three case examples informed by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) Framework to illustrate the application of these co-creation principles. Lastly, we offer recommendations for promoting co-creation in IS research moving forward. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10003830/ /pubmed/36908715 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.942658 Text en Copyright © 2022 Pérez Jolles, Willging, Stadnick, Crable, Lengnick-Hall, Hawkins and Aarons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Pérez Jolles, Mónica Willging, Cathleen E. Stadnick, Nicole A. Crable, Erika L. Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca Hawkins, Jemma Aarons, Gregory A. Understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: Recommendations for a path forward |
title | Understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: Recommendations for a path forward |
title_full | Understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: Recommendations for a path forward |
title_fullStr | Understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: Recommendations for a path forward |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: Recommendations for a path forward |
title_short | Understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: Recommendations for a path forward |
title_sort | understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: recommendations for a path forward |
topic | Health Services |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908715 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2022.942658 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perezjollesmonica understandingimplementationresearchcollaborationsfromacocreationlensrecommendationsforapathforward AT willgingcathleene understandingimplementationresearchcollaborationsfromacocreationlensrecommendationsforapathforward AT stadnicknicolea understandingimplementationresearchcollaborationsfromacocreationlensrecommendationsforapathforward AT crableerikal understandingimplementationresearchcollaborationsfromacocreationlensrecommendationsforapathforward AT lengnickhallrebecca understandingimplementationresearchcollaborationsfromacocreationlensrecommendationsforapathforward AT hawkinsjemma understandingimplementationresearchcollaborationsfromacocreationlensrecommendationsforapathforward AT aaronsgregorya understandingimplementationresearchcollaborationsfromacocreationlensrecommendationsforapathforward |