Cargando…

Gut Microbiota in Chronic Kidney Disease: From Composition to Modulation towards Better Outcomes—A Systematic Review

Background: A bidirectional kidney–gut axis was described in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). On the one hand, gut dysbiosis could promote CKD progression, but on the other hand, studies reported specific gut microbiota alterations linked to CKD. Therefore, we aimed to systematically revi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Voroneanu, Luminita, Burlacu, Alexandru, Brinza, Crischentian, Covic, Andreea, Balan, Gheorghe G., Nistor, Ionut, Popa, Cristina, Hogas, Simona, Covic, Adrian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902734
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051948
_version_ 1784904718015791104
author Voroneanu, Luminita
Burlacu, Alexandru
Brinza, Crischentian
Covic, Andreea
Balan, Gheorghe G.
Nistor, Ionut
Popa, Cristina
Hogas, Simona
Covic, Adrian
author_facet Voroneanu, Luminita
Burlacu, Alexandru
Brinza, Crischentian
Covic, Andreea
Balan, Gheorghe G.
Nistor, Ionut
Popa, Cristina
Hogas, Simona
Covic, Adrian
author_sort Voroneanu, Luminita
collection PubMed
description Background: A bidirectional kidney–gut axis was described in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). On the one hand, gut dysbiosis could promote CKD progression, but on the other hand, studies reported specific gut microbiota alterations linked to CKD. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review the literature on gut microbiota composition in CKD patients, including those with advanced CKD stages and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), possibilities to shift gut microbiota, and its impact on clinical outcomes. Materials and methods: We performed a literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases to find eligible studies using pre-specified keywords. Additionally, key inclusion and exclusion criteria were pre-defined to guide the eligibility assessment. Results: We retrieved 69 eligible studies which met all inclusion criteria and were analyzed in the present systematic review. Microbiota diversity was decreased in CKD patients as compared to healthy individuals. Ruminococcus and Roseburia had good power to discriminate between CKD patients and healthy controls (AUC = 0.771 and AUC = 0.803, respectively). Roseburia abundance was consistently decreased in CKD patients, especially in those with ESKD (p < 0.001). A model based on 25 microbiota dissimilarities had an excellent predictive power for diabetic nephropathy (AUC = 0.972). Several microbiota patterns were observed in deceased ESKD patients as compared to the survivor group (increased Lactobacillus, Yersinia, and decreased Bacteroides and Phascolarctobacterium levels). Additionally, gut dysbiosis was associated with peritonitis and enhanced inflammatory activity. In addition, some studies documented a beneficial effect on gut flora composition attributed to synbiotic and probiotic therapies. Large randomized clinical trials are required to investigate the impact of different microbiota modulation strategies on gut microflora composition and subsequent clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Patients with CKD had an altered gut microbiome profile, even at early disease stages. Different abundance at genera and species levels could be used in clinical models to discriminate between healthy individuals and patients with CKD. ESKD patients with an increased mortality risk could be identified through gut microbiota analysis. Modulation therapy studies are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10003930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100039302023-03-11 Gut Microbiota in Chronic Kidney Disease: From Composition to Modulation towards Better Outcomes—A Systematic Review Voroneanu, Luminita Burlacu, Alexandru Brinza, Crischentian Covic, Andreea Balan, Gheorghe G. Nistor, Ionut Popa, Cristina Hogas, Simona Covic, Adrian J Clin Med Systematic Review Background: A bidirectional kidney–gut axis was described in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). On the one hand, gut dysbiosis could promote CKD progression, but on the other hand, studies reported specific gut microbiota alterations linked to CKD. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review the literature on gut microbiota composition in CKD patients, including those with advanced CKD stages and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), possibilities to shift gut microbiota, and its impact on clinical outcomes. Materials and methods: We performed a literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases to find eligible studies using pre-specified keywords. Additionally, key inclusion and exclusion criteria were pre-defined to guide the eligibility assessment. Results: We retrieved 69 eligible studies which met all inclusion criteria and were analyzed in the present systematic review. Microbiota diversity was decreased in CKD patients as compared to healthy individuals. Ruminococcus and Roseburia had good power to discriminate between CKD patients and healthy controls (AUC = 0.771 and AUC = 0.803, respectively). Roseburia abundance was consistently decreased in CKD patients, especially in those with ESKD (p < 0.001). A model based on 25 microbiota dissimilarities had an excellent predictive power for diabetic nephropathy (AUC = 0.972). Several microbiota patterns were observed in deceased ESKD patients as compared to the survivor group (increased Lactobacillus, Yersinia, and decreased Bacteroides and Phascolarctobacterium levels). Additionally, gut dysbiosis was associated with peritonitis and enhanced inflammatory activity. In addition, some studies documented a beneficial effect on gut flora composition attributed to synbiotic and probiotic therapies. Large randomized clinical trials are required to investigate the impact of different microbiota modulation strategies on gut microflora composition and subsequent clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Patients with CKD had an altered gut microbiome profile, even at early disease stages. Different abundance at genera and species levels could be used in clinical models to discriminate between healthy individuals and patients with CKD. ESKD patients with an increased mortality risk could be identified through gut microbiota analysis. Modulation therapy studies are warranted. MDPI 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10003930/ /pubmed/36902734 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051948 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Voroneanu, Luminita
Burlacu, Alexandru
Brinza, Crischentian
Covic, Andreea
Balan, Gheorghe G.
Nistor, Ionut
Popa, Cristina
Hogas, Simona
Covic, Adrian
Gut Microbiota in Chronic Kidney Disease: From Composition to Modulation towards Better Outcomes—A Systematic Review
title Gut Microbiota in Chronic Kidney Disease: From Composition to Modulation towards Better Outcomes—A Systematic Review
title_full Gut Microbiota in Chronic Kidney Disease: From Composition to Modulation towards Better Outcomes—A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Gut Microbiota in Chronic Kidney Disease: From Composition to Modulation towards Better Outcomes—A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Gut Microbiota in Chronic Kidney Disease: From Composition to Modulation towards Better Outcomes—A Systematic Review
title_short Gut Microbiota in Chronic Kidney Disease: From Composition to Modulation towards Better Outcomes—A Systematic Review
title_sort gut microbiota in chronic kidney disease: from composition to modulation towards better outcomes—a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10003930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902734
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051948
work_keys_str_mv AT voroneanuluminita gutmicrobiotainchronickidneydiseasefromcompositiontomodulationtowardsbetteroutcomesasystematicreview
AT burlacualexandru gutmicrobiotainchronickidneydiseasefromcompositiontomodulationtowardsbetteroutcomesasystematicreview
AT brinzacrischentian gutmicrobiotainchronickidneydiseasefromcompositiontomodulationtowardsbetteroutcomesasystematicreview
AT covicandreea gutmicrobiotainchronickidneydiseasefromcompositiontomodulationtowardsbetteroutcomesasystematicreview
AT balangheorgheg gutmicrobiotainchronickidneydiseasefromcompositiontomodulationtowardsbetteroutcomesasystematicreview
AT nistorionut gutmicrobiotainchronickidneydiseasefromcompositiontomodulationtowardsbetteroutcomesasystematicreview
AT popacristina gutmicrobiotainchronickidneydiseasefromcompositiontomodulationtowardsbetteroutcomesasystematicreview
AT hogassimona gutmicrobiotainchronickidneydiseasefromcompositiontomodulationtowardsbetteroutcomesasystematicreview
AT covicadrian gutmicrobiotainchronickidneydiseasefromcompositiontomodulationtowardsbetteroutcomesasystematicreview