Cargando…

The Fracture Load as a Function of the Material Thickness: The Key to Computing the Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Materials?

The thickness of a material has a significant impact on its fracture load. The aim of the study was to find and describe a mathematical relationship between the material thickness and the fracture load for dental all-ceramics. In total, 180 specimens were prepared from a leucite silicate ceramic (ES...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schweiger, Josef, Erdelt, Kurt-Jürgen, Graf, Tobias, Sciuk, Thomas, Edelhoff, Daniel, Güth, Jan-Frederik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36903110
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16051997
_version_ 1784904761350291456
author Schweiger, Josef
Erdelt, Kurt-Jürgen
Graf, Tobias
Sciuk, Thomas
Edelhoff, Daniel
Güth, Jan-Frederik
author_facet Schweiger, Josef
Erdelt, Kurt-Jürgen
Graf, Tobias
Sciuk, Thomas
Edelhoff, Daniel
Güth, Jan-Frederik
author_sort Schweiger, Josef
collection PubMed
description The thickness of a material has a significant impact on its fracture load. The aim of the study was to find and describe a mathematical relationship between the material thickness and the fracture load for dental all-ceramics. In total, 180 specimens were prepared from a leucite silicate ceramic (ESS), a lithium disilicate ceramic (EMX), and a 3Y-TZP zirconia ceramic (LP) in five thicknesses (0.4, 0.7, 1.0, 1.3, and 1.6 mm; n = 12). The fracture load of all specimens was determined using the biaxial bending test according to the DIN EN ISO 6872. The regression analyses for the linear, quadratic, and cubic curve characteristics of the materials were conducted, and the cubic regression curves showed the best correlation (coefficients of determination (R(2)): ESS R(2) = 0.974, EMX R(2) = 0.947, LP R(2) = 0.969) for the fracture load values as a function of the material thickness. A cubic relationship could be described for the materials investigated. Applying the cubic function and material-specific fracture-load coefficients, the respective fracture load values can be calculated for the individual material thicknesses. These results help to improve and objectify the estimation of the fracture loads of restorations, to enable a more patient- and indication-centered situation-dependent material choice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10004144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100041442023-03-11 The Fracture Load as a Function of the Material Thickness: The Key to Computing the Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Materials? Schweiger, Josef Erdelt, Kurt-Jürgen Graf, Tobias Sciuk, Thomas Edelhoff, Daniel Güth, Jan-Frederik Materials (Basel) Article The thickness of a material has a significant impact on its fracture load. The aim of the study was to find and describe a mathematical relationship between the material thickness and the fracture load for dental all-ceramics. In total, 180 specimens were prepared from a leucite silicate ceramic (ESS), a lithium disilicate ceramic (EMX), and a 3Y-TZP zirconia ceramic (LP) in five thicknesses (0.4, 0.7, 1.0, 1.3, and 1.6 mm; n = 12). The fracture load of all specimens was determined using the biaxial bending test according to the DIN EN ISO 6872. The regression analyses for the linear, quadratic, and cubic curve characteristics of the materials were conducted, and the cubic regression curves showed the best correlation (coefficients of determination (R(2)): ESS R(2) = 0.974, EMX R(2) = 0.947, LP R(2) = 0.969) for the fracture load values as a function of the material thickness. A cubic relationship could be described for the materials investigated. Applying the cubic function and material-specific fracture-load coefficients, the respective fracture load values can be calculated for the individual material thicknesses. These results help to improve and objectify the estimation of the fracture loads of restorations, to enable a more patient- and indication-centered situation-dependent material choice. MDPI 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10004144/ /pubmed/36903110 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16051997 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schweiger, Josef
Erdelt, Kurt-Jürgen
Graf, Tobias
Sciuk, Thomas
Edelhoff, Daniel
Güth, Jan-Frederik
The Fracture Load as a Function of the Material Thickness: The Key to Computing the Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Materials?
title The Fracture Load as a Function of the Material Thickness: The Key to Computing the Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Materials?
title_full The Fracture Load as a Function of the Material Thickness: The Key to Computing the Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Materials?
title_fullStr The Fracture Load as a Function of the Material Thickness: The Key to Computing the Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Materials?
title_full_unstemmed The Fracture Load as a Function of the Material Thickness: The Key to Computing the Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Materials?
title_short The Fracture Load as a Function of the Material Thickness: The Key to Computing the Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Materials?
title_sort fracture load as a function of the material thickness: the key to computing the strength of monolithic all-ceramic materials?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36903110
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16051997
work_keys_str_mv AT schweigerjosef thefractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials
AT erdeltkurtjurgen thefractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials
AT graftobias thefractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials
AT sciukthomas thefractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials
AT edelhoffdaniel thefractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials
AT guthjanfrederik thefractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials
AT schweigerjosef fractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials
AT erdeltkurtjurgen fractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials
AT graftobias fractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials
AT sciukthomas fractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials
AT edelhoffdaniel fractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials
AT guthjanfrederik fractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials