Cargando…
The Fracture Load as a Function of the Material Thickness: The Key to Computing the Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Materials?
The thickness of a material has a significant impact on its fracture load. The aim of the study was to find and describe a mathematical relationship between the material thickness and the fracture load for dental all-ceramics. In total, 180 specimens were prepared from a leucite silicate ceramic (ES...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36903110 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16051997 |
_version_ | 1784904761350291456 |
---|---|
author | Schweiger, Josef Erdelt, Kurt-Jürgen Graf, Tobias Sciuk, Thomas Edelhoff, Daniel Güth, Jan-Frederik |
author_facet | Schweiger, Josef Erdelt, Kurt-Jürgen Graf, Tobias Sciuk, Thomas Edelhoff, Daniel Güth, Jan-Frederik |
author_sort | Schweiger, Josef |
collection | PubMed |
description | The thickness of a material has a significant impact on its fracture load. The aim of the study was to find and describe a mathematical relationship between the material thickness and the fracture load for dental all-ceramics. In total, 180 specimens were prepared from a leucite silicate ceramic (ESS), a lithium disilicate ceramic (EMX), and a 3Y-TZP zirconia ceramic (LP) in five thicknesses (0.4, 0.7, 1.0, 1.3, and 1.6 mm; n = 12). The fracture load of all specimens was determined using the biaxial bending test according to the DIN EN ISO 6872. The regression analyses for the linear, quadratic, and cubic curve characteristics of the materials were conducted, and the cubic regression curves showed the best correlation (coefficients of determination (R(2)): ESS R(2) = 0.974, EMX R(2) = 0.947, LP R(2) = 0.969) for the fracture load values as a function of the material thickness. A cubic relationship could be described for the materials investigated. Applying the cubic function and material-specific fracture-load coefficients, the respective fracture load values can be calculated for the individual material thicknesses. These results help to improve and objectify the estimation of the fracture loads of restorations, to enable a more patient- and indication-centered situation-dependent material choice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10004144 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100041442023-03-11 The Fracture Load as a Function of the Material Thickness: The Key to Computing the Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Materials? Schweiger, Josef Erdelt, Kurt-Jürgen Graf, Tobias Sciuk, Thomas Edelhoff, Daniel Güth, Jan-Frederik Materials (Basel) Article The thickness of a material has a significant impact on its fracture load. The aim of the study was to find and describe a mathematical relationship between the material thickness and the fracture load for dental all-ceramics. In total, 180 specimens were prepared from a leucite silicate ceramic (ESS), a lithium disilicate ceramic (EMX), and a 3Y-TZP zirconia ceramic (LP) in five thicknesses (0.4, 0.7, 1.0, 1.3, and 1.6 mm; n = 12). The fracture load of all specimens was determined using the biaxial bending test according to the DIN EN ISO 6872. The regression analyses for the linear, quadratic, and cubic curve characteristics of the materials were conducted, and the cubic regression curves showed the best correlation (coefficients of determination (R(2)): ESS R(2) = 0.974, EMX R(2) = 0.947, LP R(2) = 0.969) for the fracture load values as a function of the material thickness. A cubic relationship could be described for the materials investigated. Applying the cubic function and material-specific fracture-load coefficients, the respective fracture load values can be calculated for the individual material thicknesses. These results help to improve and objectify the estimation of the fracture loads of restorations, to enable a more patient- and indication-centered situation-dependent material choice. MDPI 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10004144/ /pubmed/36903110 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16051997 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Schweiger, Josef Erdelt, Kurt-Jürgen Graf, Tobias Sciuk, Thomas Edelhoff, Daniel Güth, Jan-Frederik The Fracture Load as a Function of the Material Thickness: The Key to Computing the Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Materials? |
title | The Fracture Load as a Function of the Material Thickness: The Key to Computing the Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Materials? |
title_full | The Fracture Load as a Function of the Material Thickness: The Key to Computing the Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Materials? |
title_fullStr | The Fracture Load as a Function of the Material Thickness: The Key to Computing the Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Materials? |
title_full_unstemmed | The Fracture Load as a Function of the Material Thickness: The Key to Computing the Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Materials? |
title_short | The Fracture Load as a Function of the Material Thickness: The Key to Computing the Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Materials? |
title_sort | fracture load as a function of the material thickness: the key to computing the strength of monolithic all-ceramic materials? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36903110 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16051997 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schweigerjosef thefractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials AT erdeltkurtjurgen thefractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials AT graftobias thefractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials AT sciukthomas thefractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials AT edelhoffdaniel thefractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials AT guthjanfrederik thefractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials AT schweigerjosef fractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials AT erdeltkurtjurgen fractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials AT graftobias fractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials AT sciukthomas fractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials AT edelhoffdaniel fractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials AT guthjanfrederik fractureloadasafunctionofthematerialthicknessthekeytocomputingthestrengthofmonolithicallceramicmaterials |