Cargando…
Brace-Free Rehabilitation after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft Is Not Inferior to Brace-Based Rehabilitation—A Randomised Controlled Trial
Purpose: The postoperative use of a rehabilitative knee brace after isolated primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) using a hamstring tendon (HT) autograft is controversial. A knee brace may provide subjective safety but can cause damage if applied incorrectly. The aim of thi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902868 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12052074 |
_version_ | 1784904784150528000 |
---|---|
author | Schoepp, Christian Ohmann, Tobias Martin, Wolfgang Praetorius, Arthur Seelmann, Christine Dudda, Marcel Stengel, Dirk Hax, Jakob |
author_facet | Schoepp, Christian Ohmann, Tobias Martin, Wolfgang Praetorius, Arthur Seelmann, Christine Dudda, Marcel Stengel, Dirk Hax, Jakob |
author_sort | Schoepp, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: The postoperative use of a rehabilitative knee brace after isolated primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) using a hamstring tendon (HT) autograft is controversial. A knee brace may provide subjective safety but can cause damage if applied incorrectly. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a knee brace on clinical outcomes following isolated ACLR using HT autograft. Methods: In this prospective randomised trial, 114 adults (32.4 ± 11.5 years, 35.1% women) underwent isolated ACLR using HT autograft after primary ACL rupture. Patients were randomly assigned to wear either a knee brace (n = 58) or no brace (n = 56) for 6 weeks postoperatively. An initial examination was performed preoperatively, and at 6 weeks and 4, 6, and 12 months. The primary endpoint was the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score to measure participants’ subjective perceptions. Secondary endpoints included objective knee function assessed by IKDC, instrumented knee laxity measurements, isokinetic strength tests of the knee extensors and flexors, Lysholm Knee Score, Tegner Activity Score, Anterior Cruciate Ligament—Return to Sport after Injury Score, and quality of life determined by Short Form-36 (SF36). Results: There were no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in IKDC scores between the two study groups (3.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) −1.39 to 7.97, p = 0.03 for evidence of non-inferiority of brace-free compared with brace-based rehabilitation). The difference in Lysholm score was 3.20 (95% CI −2.47 to 8.87); the difference in SF36 physical component score 0.09 (95% CI −1.93 to 3.03). In addition, isokinetic testing did not reveal any clinically relevant differences between the groups (n.s.). Conclusions: Brace-free rehabilitation is non-inferior to a brace-based protocol regarding physical recovery 1 year after isolated ACLR using HT autograft. Consequently, the use of a knee brace might be avoided after such a procedure. Level of Evidence: Level I, therapeutic study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10004240 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100042402023-03-11 Brace-Free Rehabilitation after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft Is Not Inferior to Brace-Based Rehabilitation—A Randomised Controlled Trial Schoepp, Christian Ohmann, Tobias Martin, Wolfgang Praetorius, Arthur Seelmann, Christine Dudda, Marcel Stengel, Dirk Hax, Jakob J Clin Med Article Purpose: The postoperative use of a rehabilitative knee brace after isolated primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) using a hamstring tendon (HT) autograft is controversial. A knee brace may provide subjective safety but can cause damage if applied incorrectly. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a knee brace on clinical outcomes following isolated ACLR using HT autograft. Methods: In this prospective randomised trial, 114 adults (32.4 ± 11.5 years, 35.1% women) underwent isolated ACLR using HT autograft after primary ACL rupture. Patients were randomly assigned to wear either a knee brace (n = 58) or no brace (n = 56) for 6 weeks postoperatively. An initial examination was performed preoperatively, and at 6 weeks and 4, 6, and 12 months. The primary endpoint was the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score to measure participants’ subjective perceptions. Secondary endpoints included objective knee function assessed by IKDC, instrumented knee laxity measurements, isokinetic strength tests of the knee extensors and flexors, Lysholm Knee Score, Tegner Activity Score, Anterior Cruciate Ligament—Return to Sport after Injury Score, and quality of life determined by Short Form-36 (SF36). Results: There were no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in IKDC scores between the two study groups (3.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) −1.39 to 7.97, p = 0.03 for evidence of non-inferiority of brace-free compared with brace-based rehabilitation). The difference in Lysholm score was 3.20 (95% CI −2.47 to 8.87); the difference in SF36 physical component score 0.09 (95% CI −1.93 to 3.03). In addition, isokinetic testing did not reveal any clinically relevant differences between the groups (n.s.). Conclusions: Brace-free rehabilitation is non-inferior to a brace-based protocol regarding physical recovery 1 year after isolated ACLR using HT autograft. Consequently, the use of a knee brace might be avoided after such a procedure. Level of Evidence: Level I, therapeutic study. MDPI 2023-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10004240/ /pubmed/36902868 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12052074 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Schoepp, Christian Ohmann, Tobias Martin, Wolfgang Praetorius, Arthur Seelmann, Christine Dudda, Marcel Stengel, Dirk Hax, Jakob Brace-Free Rehabilitation after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft Is Not Inferior to Brace-Based Rehabilitation—A Randomised Controlled Trial |
title | Brace-Free Rehabilitation after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft Is Not Inferior to Brace-Based Rehabilitation—A Randomised Controlled Trial |
title_full | Brace-Free Rehabilitation after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft Is Not Inferior to Brace-Based Rehabilitation—A Randomised Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Brace-Free Rehabilitation after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft Is Not Inferior to Brace-Based Rehabilitation—A Randomised Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Brace-Free Rehabilitation after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft Is Not Inferior to Brace-Based Rehabilitation—A Randomised Controlled Trial |
title_short | Brace-Free Rehabilitation after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft Is Not Inferior to Brace-Based Rehabilitation—A Randomised Controlled Trial |
title_sort | brace-free rehabilitation after isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft is not inferior to brace-based rehabilitation—a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902868 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12052074 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schoeppchristian bracefreerehabilitationafterisolatedanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringtendonautograftisnotinferiortobracebasedrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ohmanntobias bracefreerehabilitationafterisolatedanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringtendonautograftisnotinferiortobracebasedrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT martinwolfgang bracefreerehabilitationafterisolatedanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringtendonautograftisnotinferiortobracebasedrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT praetoriusarthur bracefreerehabilitationafterisolatedanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringtendonautograftisnotinferiortobracebasedrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT seelmannchristine bracefreerehabilitationafterisolatedanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringtendonautograftisnotinferiortobracebasedrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT duddamarcel bracefreerehabilitationafterisolatedanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringtendonautograftisnotinferiortobracebasedrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT stengeldirk bracefreerehabilitationafterisolatedanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringtendonautograftisnotinferiortobracebasedrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT haxjakob bracefreerehabilitationafterisolatedanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringtendonautograftisnotinferiortobracebasedrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial |