Cargando…

Brace-Free Rehabilitation after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft Is Not Inferior to Brace-Based Rehabilitation—A Randomised Controlled Trial

Purpose: The postoperative use of a rehabilitative knee brace after isolated primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) using a hamstring tendon (HT) autograft is controversial. A knee brace may provide subjective safety but can cause damage if applied incorrectly. The aim of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schoepp, Christian, Ohmann, Tobias, Martin, Wolfgang, Praetorius, Arthur, Seelmann, Christine, Dudda, Marcel, Stengel, Dirk, Hax, Jakob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902868
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12052074
_version_ 1784904784150528000
author Schoepp, Christian
Ohmann, Tobias
Martin, Wolfgang
Praetorius, Arthur
Seelmann, Christine
Dudda, Marcel
Stengel, Dirk
Hax, Jakob
author_facet Schoepp, Christian
Ohmann, Tobias
Martin, Wolfgang
Praetorius, Arthur
Seelmann, Christine
Dudda, Marcel
Stengel, Dirk
Hax, Jakob
author_sort Schoepp, Christian
collection PubMed
description Purpose: The postoperative use of a rehabilitative knee brace after isolated primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) using a hamstring tendon (HT) autograft is controversial. A knee brace may provide subjective safety but can cause damage if applied incorrectly. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a knee brace on clinical outcomes following isolated ACLR using HT autograft. Methods: In this prospective randomised trial, 114 adults (32.4 ± 11.5 years, 35.1% women) underwent isolated ACLR using HT autograft after primary ACL rupture. Patients were randomly assigned to wear either a knee brace (n = 58) or no brace (n = 56) for 6 weeks postoperatively. An initial examination was performed preoperatively, and at 6 weeks and 4, 6, and 12 months. The primary endpoint was the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score to measure participants’ subjective perceptions. Secondary endpoints included objective knee function assessed by IKDC, instrumented knee laxity measurements, isokinetic strength tests of the knee extensors and flexors, Lysholm Knee Score, Tegner Activity Score, Anterior Cruciate Ligament—Return to Sport after Injury Score, and quality of life determined by Short Form-36 (SF36). Results: There were no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in IKDC scores between the two study groups (3.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) −1.39 to 7.97, p = 0.03 for evidence of non-inferiority of brace-free compared with brace-based rehabilitation). The difference in Lysholm score was 3.20 (95% CI −2.47 to 8.87); the difference in SF36 physical component score 0.09 (95% CI −1.93 to 3.03). In addition, isokinetic testing did not reveal any clinically relevant differences between the groups (n.s.). Conclusions: Brace-free rehabilitation is non-inferior to a brace-based protocol regarding physical recovery 1 year after isolated ACLR using HT autograft. Consequently, the use of a knee brace might be avoided after such a procedure. Level of Evidence: Level I, therapeutic study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10004240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100042402023-03-11 Brace-Free Rehabilitation after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft Is Not Inferior to Brace-Based Rehabilitation—A Randomised Controlled Trial Schoepp, Christian Ohmann, Tobias Martin, Wolfgang Praetorius, Arthur Seelmann, Christine Dudda, Marcel Stengel, Dirk Hax, Jakob J Clin Med Article Purpose: The postoperative use of a rehabilitative knee brace after isolated primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) using a hamstring tendon (HT) autograft is controversial. A knee brace may provide subjective safety but can cause damage if applied incorrectly. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a knee brace on clinical outcomes following isolated ACLR using HT autograft. Methods: In this prospective randomised trial, 114 adults (32.4 ± 11.5 years, 35.1% women) underwent isolated ACLR using HT autograft after primary ACL rupture. Patients were randomly assigned to wear either a knee brace (n = 58) or no brace (n = 56) for 6 weeks postoperatively. An initial examination was performed preoperatively, and at 6 weeks and 4, 6, and 12 months. The primary endpoint was the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score to measure participants’ subjective perceptions. Secondary endpoints included objective knee function assessed by IKDC, instrumented knee laxity measurements, isokinetic strength tests of the knee extensors and flexors, Lysholm Knee Score, Tegner Activity Score, Anterior Cruciate Ligament—Return to Sport after Injury Score, and quality of life determined by Short Form-36 (SF36). Results: There were no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in IKDC scores between the two study groups (3.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) −1.39 to 7.97, p = 0.03 for evidence of non-inferiority of brace-free compared with brace-based rehabilitation). The difference in Lysholm score was 3.20 (95% CI −2.47 to 8.87); the difference in SF36 physical component score 0.09 (95% CI −1.93 to 3.03). In addition, isokinetic testing did not reveal any clinically relevant differences between the groups (n.s.). Conclusions: Brace-free rehabilitation is non-inferior to a brace-based protocol regarding physical recovery 1 year after isolated ACLR using HT autograft. Consequently, the use of a knee brace might be avoided after such a procedure. Level of Evidence: Level I, therapeutic study. MDPI 2023-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10004240/ /pubmed/36902868 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12052074 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schoepp, Christian
Ohmann, Tobias
Martin, Wolfgang
Praetorius, Arthur
Seelmann, Christine
Dudda, Marcel
Stengel, Dirk
Hax, Jakob
Brace-Free Rehabilitation after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft Is Not Inferior to Brace-Based Rehabilitation—A Randomised Controlled Trial
title Brace-Free Rehabilitation after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft Is Not Inferior to Brace-Based Rehabilitation—A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full Brace-Free Rehabilitation after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft Is Not Inferior to Brace-Based Rehabilitation—A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Brace-Free Rehabilitation after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft Is Not Inferior to Brace-Based Rehabilitation—A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Brace-Free Rehabilitation after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft Is Not Inferior to Brace-Based Rehabilitation—A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_short Brace-Free Rehabilitation after Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft Is Not Inferior to Brace-Based Rehabilitation—A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_sort brace-free rehabilitation after isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft is not inferior to brace-based rehabilitation—a randomised controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902868
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12052074
work_keys_str_mv AT schoeppchristian bracefreerehabilitationafterisolatedanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringtendonautograftisnotinferiortobracebasedrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ohmanntobias bracefreerehabilitationafterisolatedanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringtendonautograftisnotinferiortobracebasedrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT martinwolfgang bracefreerehabilitationafterisolatedanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringtendonautograftisnotinferiortobracebasedrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT praetoriusarthur bracefreerehabilitationafterisolatedanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringtendonautograftisnotinferiortobracebasedrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT seelmannchristine bracefreerehabilitationafterisolatedanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringtendonautograftisnotinferiortobracebasedrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT duddamarcel bracefreerehabilitationafterisolatedanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringtendonautograftisnotinferiortobracebasedrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stengeldirk bracefreerehabilitationafterisolatedanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringtendonautograftisnotinferiortobracebasedrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT haxjakob bracefreerehabilitationafterisolatedanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionwithhamstringtendonautograftisnotinferiortobracebasedrehabilitationarandomisedcontrolledtrial