Cargando…

A TriNetX Registry Analysis of the Need for Second Procedures following Index Anterior and Posterior Urethroplasty

Background: We queried a global database to understand re-intervention rates following urethroplasty with the goal of evaluating whether they align with previously published data. Methods: Using the TriNetX database and Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Diseases...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prebay, Zachary J., Ostrovsky, Adam M., Buck, Matthew, Chung, Paul H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902842
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12052055
_version_ 1784904790318252032
author Prebay, Zachary J.
Ostrovsky, Adam M.
Buck, Matthew
Chung, Paul H.
author_facet Prebay, Zachary J.
Ostrovsky, Adam M.
Buck, Matthew
Chung, Paul H.
author_sort Prebay, Zachary J.
collection PubMed
description Background: We queried a global database to understand re-intervention rates following urethroplasty with the goal of evaluating whether they align with previously published data. Methods: Using the TriNetX database and Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD) codes, we identified adult male patients with urethral stricture disease (ICD N35) who underwent one-stage anterior (CPT 53410) or posterior urethroplasty (CPT 53415), with or without (substitution urethroplasty) a tissue flap (CPT 15740) or buccal graft (CPT 15240 or 15241). We set urethroplasty as the index event and used descriptive statistics to report the incidence of secondary procedures (using CPT codes) within 10 years after the index event. Results: There were 6606 patients who underwent urethroplasty within the last 20 years, with 14.3% of patients undergoing a second procedure after index event. Upon subgroup analysis, reintervention rates were 14.5% for anterior urethroplasty vs. 12.4% of patients with an anterior substitution urethroplasty (RR 1.7, p = 0.09) and 13.3% for posterior urethroplasty vs. 8.2% for patients with a posterior substitution urethroplasty (RR 1.6, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Most patients will not need any form of re-intervention following urethroplasty. These data align with previously described recurrence rates, which may help urologists counsel patients considering urethroplasty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10004265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100042652023-03-11 A TriNetX Registry Analysis of the Need for Second Procedures following Index Anterior and Posterior Urethroplasty Prebay, Zachary J. Ostrovsky, Adam M. Buck, Matthew Chung, Paul H. J Clin Med Article Background: We queried a global database to understand re-intervention rates following urethroplasty with the goal of evaluating whether they align with previously published data. Methods: Using the TriNetX database and Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD) codes, we identified adult male patients with urethral stricture disease (ICD N35) who underwent one-stage anterior (CPT 53410) or posterior urethroplasty (CPT 53415), with or without (substitution urethroplasty) a tissue flap (CPT 15740) or buccal graft (CPT 15240 or 15241). We set urethroplasty as the index event and used descriptive statistics to report the incidence of secondary procedures (using CPT codes) within 10 years after the index event. Results: There were 6606 patients who underwent urethroplasty within the last 20 years, with 14.3% of patients undergoing a second procedure after index event. Upon subgroup analysis, reintervention rates were 14.5% for anterior urethroplasty vs. 12.4% of patients with an anterior substitution urethroplasty (RR 1.7, p = 0.09) and 13.3% for posterior urethroplasty vs. 8.2% for patients with a posterior substitution urethroplasty (RR 1.6, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Most patients will not need any form of re-intervention following urethroplasty. These data align with previously described recurrence rates, which may help urologists counsel patients considering urethroplasty. MDPI 2023-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10004265/ /pubmed/36902842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12052055 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Prebay, Zachary J.
Ostrovsky, Adam M.
Buck, Matthew
Chung, Paul H.
A TriNetX Registry Analysis of the Need for Second Procedures following Index Anterior and Posterior Urethroplasty
title A TriNetX Registry Analysis of the Need for Second Procedures following Index Anterior and Posterior Urethroplasty
title_full A TriNetX Registry Analysis of the Need for Second Procedures following Index Anterior and Posterior Urethroplasty
title_fullStr A TriNetX Registry Analysis of the Need for Second Procedures following Index Anterior and Posterior Urethroplasty
title_full_unstemmed A TriNetX Registry Analysis of the Need for Second Procedures following Index Anterior and Posterior Urethroplasty
title_short A TriNetX Registry Analysis of the Need for Second Procedures following Index Anterior and Posterior Urethroplasty
title_sort trinetx registry analysis of the need for second procedures following index anterior and posterior urethroplasty
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902842
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12052055
work_keys_str_mv AT prebayzacharyj atrinetxregistryanalysisoftheneedforsecondproceduresfollowingindexanteriorandposteriorurethroplasty
AT ostrovskyadamm atrinetxregistryanalysisoftheneedforsecondproceduresfollowingindexanteriorandposteriorurethroplasty
AT buckmatthew atrinetxregistryanalysisoftheneedforsecondproceduresfollowingindexanteriorandposteriorurethroplasty
AT chungpaulh atrinetxregistryanalysisoftheneedforsecondproceduresfollowingindexanteriorandposteriorurethroplasty
AT prebayzacharyj trinetxregistryanalysisoftheneedforsecondproceduresfollowingindexanteriorandposteriorurethroplasty
AT ostrovskyadamm trinetxregistryanalysisoftheneedforsecondproceduresfollowingindexanteriorandposteriorurethroplasty
AT buckmatthew trinetxregistryanalysisoftheneedforsecondproceduresfollowingindexanteriorandposteriorurethroplasty
AT chungpaulh trinetxregistryanalysisoftheneedforsecondproceduresfollowingindexanteriorandposteriorurethroplasty