Cargando…
A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of hysterectomies for benign disease during the COVID-19 pandemic
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate how the pandemic might have affected the number of elective and urgent hysterectomies for benign gynecological pathologies in a single-care tertiary center in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, and to identify if there were any changes in the need for blood trans...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Associação Médica Brasileira
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36820776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20221564 |
_version_ | 1784904797792501760 |
---|---|
author | Leite, Isabella Barcellos Moterani, Nino Jose Wilson Moterani, Vinicius Cesar Moterani, Laura Bresciani Bento Gonçalves dos Reis, Francisco José Candido |
author_facet | Leite, Isabella Barcellos Moterani, Nino Jose Wilson Moterani, Vinicius Cesar Moterani, Laura Bresciani Bento Gonçalves dos Reis, Francisco José Candido |
author_sort | Leite, Isabella Barcellos |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate how the pandemic might have affected the number of elective and urgent hysterectomies for benign gynecological pathologies in a single-care tertiary center in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, and to identify if there were any changes in the need for blood transfusions. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study. It involved all non-puerperal and non-oncological hysterectomies from October 2018 to July 2021. Patients were divided into two groups, namely, the pandemic group (46 patients) and the control group (92 patients). Data were collected by reviewing the physical and electronic patient records. We carried out the statistical analysis using the RStudio software. RESULTS: The number of planned hysterectomies was 82 in the pre-pandemic group and 23 in the analysis group, representing a 71.9% decrease. When considering only urgent surgeries, 10 of them happened in the pre-pandemic group, while 23 occurred in the pandemic group, representing an increase of 130%. CONCLUSION: Elective hysterectomies may improve the quality of life of women, reducing abnormal bleeding and pelvic pain. Treatment delay can worsen patients' physiological and biological conditions, such as lower labor production, humor, and social aspects, increasing costs to the healthcare system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10004295 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Associação Médica Brasileira |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100042952023-03-11 A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of hysterectomies for benign disease during the COVID-19 pandemic Leite, Isabella Barcellos Moterani, Nino Jose Wilson Moterani, Vinicius Cesar Moterani, Laura Bresciani Bento Gonçalves dos Reis, Francisco José Candido Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate how the pandemic might have affected the number of elective and urgent hysterectomies for benign gynecological pathologies in a single-care tertiary center in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, and to identify if there were any changes in the need for blood transfusions. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study. It involved all non-puerperal and non-oncological hysterectomies from October 2018 to July 2021. Patients were divided into two groups, namely, the pandemic group (46 patients) and the control group (92 patients). Data were collected by reviewing the physical and electronic patient records. We carried out the statistical analysis using the RStudio software. RESULTS: The number of planned hysterectomies was 82 in the pre-pandemic group and 23 in the analysis group, representing a 71.9% decrease. When considering only urgent surgeries, 10 of them happened in the pre-pandemic group, while 23 occurred in the pandemic group, representing an increase of 130%. CONCLUSION: Elective hysterectomies may improve the quality of life of women, reducing abnormal bleeding and pelvic pain. Treatment delay can worsen patients' physiological and biological conditions, such as lower labor production, humor, and social aspects, increasing costs to the healthcare system. Associação Médica Brasileira 2023-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10004295/ /pubmed/36820776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20221564 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Leite, Isabella Barcellos Moterani, Nino Jose Wilson Moterani, Vinicius Cesar Moterani, Laura Bresciani Bento Gonçalves dos Reis, Francisco José Candido A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of hysterectomies for benign disease during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title | A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of hysterectomies for benign disease during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full | A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of hysterectomies for benign disease during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_fullStr | A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of hysterectomies for benign disease during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of hysterectomies for benign disease during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_short | A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of hysterectomies for benign disease during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_sort | propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of hysterectomies for benign disease during the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36820776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20221564 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leiteisabellabarcellos apropensityscorematchedretrospectivecohortstudyofhysterectomiesforbenigndiseaseduringthecovid19pandemic AT moteranininojosewilson apropensityscorematchedretrospectivecohortstudyofhysterectomiesforbenigndiseaseduringthecovid19pandemic AT moteraniviniciuscesar apropensityscorematchedretrospectivecohortstudyofhysterectomiesforbenigndiseaseduringthecovid19pandemic AT moteranilaurabrescianibentogoncalves apropensityscorematchedretrospectivecohortstudyofhysterectomiesforbenigndiseaseduringthecovid19pandemic AT dosreisfranciscojosecandido apropensityscorematchedretrospectivecohortstudyofhysterectomiesforbenigndiseaseduringthecovid19pandemic AT leiteisabellabarcellos propensityscorematchedretrospectivecohortstudyofhysterectomiesforbenigndiseaseduringthecovid19pandemic AT moteranininojosewilson propensityscorematchedretrospectivecohortstudyofhysterectomiesforbenigndiseaseduringthecovid19pandemic AT moteraniviniciuscesar propensityscorematchedretrospectivecohortstudyofhysterectomiesforbenigndiseaseduringthecovid19pandemic AT moteranilaurabrescianibentogoncalves propensityscorematchedretrospectivecohortstudyofhysterectomiesforbenigndiseaseduringthecovid19pandemic AT dosreisfranciscojosecandido propensityscorematchedretrospectivecohortstudyofhysterectomiesforbenigndiseaseduringthecovid19pandemic |