Cargando…

A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of hysterectomies for benign disease during the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate how the pandemic might have affected the number of elective and urgent hysterectomies for benign gynecological pathologies in a single-care tertiary center in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, and to identify if there were any changes in the need for blood trans...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leite, Isabella Barcellos, Moterani, Nino Jose Wilson, Moterani, Vinicius Cesar, Moterani, Laura Bresciani Bento Gonçalves, dos Reis, Francisco José Candido
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Médica Brasileira 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36820776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20221564
_version_ 1784904797792501760
author Leite, Isabella Barcellos
Moterani, Nino Jose Wilson
Moterani, Vinicius Cesar
Moterani, Laura Bresciani Bento Gonçalves
dos Reis, Francisco José Candido
author_facet Leite, Isabella Barcellos
Moterani, Nino Jose Wilson
Moterani, Vinicius Cesar
Moterani, Laura Bresciani Bento Gonçalves
dos Reis, Francisco José Candido
author_sort Leite, Isabella Barcellos
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate how the pandemic might have affected the number of elective and urgent hysterectomies for benign gynecological pathologies in a single-care tertiary center in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, and to identify if there were any changes in the need for blood transfusions. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study. It involved all non-puerperal and non-oncological hysterectomies from October 2018 to July 2021. Patients were divided into two groups, namely, the pandemic group (46 patients) and the control group (92 patients). Data were collected by reviewing the physical and electronic patient records. We carried out the statistical analysis using the RStudio software. RESULTS: The number of planned hysterectomies was 82 in the pre-pandemic group and 23 in the analysis group, representing a 71.9% decrease. When considering only urgent surgeries, 10 of them happened in the pre-pandemic group, while 23 occurred in the pandemic group, representing an increase of 130%. CONCLUSION: Elective hysterectomies may improve the quality of life of women, reducing abnormal bleeding and pelvic pain. Treatment delay can worsen patients' physiological and biological conditions, such as lower labor production, humor, and social aspects, increasing costs to the healthcare system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10004295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Associação Médica Brasileira
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100042952023-03-11 A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of hysterectomies for benign disease during the COVID-19 pandemic Leite, Isabella Barcellos Moterani, Nino Jose Wilson Moterani, Vinicius Cesar Moterani, Laura Bresciani Bento Gonçalves dos Reis, Francisco José Candido Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate how the pandemic might have affected the number of elective and urgent hysterectomies for benign gynecological pathologies in a single-care tertiary center in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, and to identify if there were any changes in the need for blood transfusions. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study. It involved all non-puerperal and non-oncological hysterectomies from October 2018 to July 2021. Patients were divided into two groups, namely, the pandemic group (46 patients) and the control group (92 patients). Data were collected by reviewing the physical and electronic patient records. We carried out the statistical analysis using the RStudio software. RESULTS: The number of planned hysterectomies was 82 in the pre-pandemic group and 23 in the analysis group, representing a 71.9% decrease. When considering only urgent surgeries, 10 of them happened in the pre-pandemic group, while 23 occurred in the pandemic group, representing an increase of 130%. CONCLUSION: Elective hysterectomies may improve the quality of life of women, reducing abnormal bleeding and pelvic pain. Treatment delay can worsen patients' physiological and biological conditions, such as lower labor production, humor, and social aspects, increasing costs to the healthcare system. Associação Médica Brasileira 2023-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10004295/ /pubmed/36820776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20221564 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Leite, Isabella Barcellos
Moterani, Nino Jose Wilson
Moterani, Vinicius Cesar
Moterani, Laura Bresciani Bento Gonçalves
dos Reis, Francisco José Candido
A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of hysterectomies for benign disease during the COVID-19 pandemic
title A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of hysterectomies for benign disease during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of hysterectomies for benign disease during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of hysterectomies for benign disease during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of hysterectomies for benign disease during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of hysterectomies for benign disease during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of hysterectomies for benign disease during the covid-19 pandemic
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36820776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20221564
work_keys_str_mv AT leiteisabellabarcellos apropensityscorematchedretrospectivecohortstudyofhysterectomiesforbenigndiseaseduringthecovid19pandemic
AT moteranininojosewilson apropensityscorematchedretrospectivecohortstudyofhysterectomiesforbenigndiseaseduringthecovid19pandemic
AT moteraniviniciuscesar apropensityscorematchedretrospectivecohortstudyofhysterectomiesforbenigndiseaseduringthecovid19pandemic
AT moteranilaurabrescianibentogoncalves apropensityscorematchedretrospectivecohortstudyofhysterectomiesforbenigndiseaseduringthecovid19pandemic
AT dosreisfranciscojosecandido apropensityscorematchedretrospectivecohortstudyofhysterectomiesforbenigndiseaseduringthecovid19pandemic
AT leiteisabellabarcellos propensityscorematchedretrospectivecohortstudyofhysterectomiesforbenigndiseaseduringthecovid19pandemic
AT moteranininojosewilson propensityscorematchedretrospectivecohortstudyofhysterectomiesforbenigndiseaseduringthecovid19pandemic
AT moteraniviniciuscesar propensityscorematchedretrospectivecohortstudyofhysterectomiesforbenigndiseaseduringthecovid19pandemic
AT moteranilaurabrescianibentogoncalves propensityscorematchedretrospectivecohortstudyofhysterectomiesforbenigndiseaseduringthecovid19pandemic
AT dosreisfranciscojosecandido propensityscorematchedretrospectivecohortstudyofhysterectomiesforbenigndiseaseduringthecovid19pandemic