Cargando…

Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the frequency of Cochrane systematic reviews and Cochrane systematic reviews protocols using (or planning to use) the risk of bias 2.0 tool to assess the risk of bias of the included randomized clinical trials. STUDY DESIGN: This is a meta-research st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera, Sá, Kamilla Mayr Martins, Santos, Giovanna Marcílio, Santos, Elaine Marcílio, Pacheco, Rafael Leite, Riera, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Médica Brasileira 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36820779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20221593
_version_ 1784904798270652416
author Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera
Sá, Kamilla Mayr Martins
Santos, Giovanna Marcílio
Santos, Elaine Marcílio
Pacheco, Rafael Leite
Riera, Rachel
author_facet Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera
Sá, Kamilla Mayr Martins
Santos, Giovanna Marcílio
Santos, Elaine Marcílio
Pacheco, Rafael Leite
Riera, Rachel
author_sort Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the frequency of Cochrane systematic reviews and Cochrane systematic reviews protocols using (or planning to use) the risk of bias 2.0 tool to assess the risk of bias of the included randomized clinical trials. STUDY DESIGN: This is a meta-research study. METHODS: We included Cochrane systematic reviews or Cochrane systematic reviews protocols that planned to include randomized clinical trials. We assessed the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and screened for issues published after the launch of risk of bias 2.0 tool (2019–2022). Two independent investigators performed the study selection and data extraction. RESULTS: We analyzed 440 Cochrane systematic reviews and 536 Cochrane systematic reviews protocols. Overall, 4.8% of the Cochrane systematic reviews and 28.5% of the Cochrane systematic reviews protocols used or planned to use risk of bias 2.0 tool. Although low, adherence is increasing over time. In 2019, 0% of Cochrane systematic reviews used risk of bias 2.0 tool, compared to 24.1% in 2022. In Cochrane systematic reviews protocols, adherence increased from 6.9% in 2019 to 41.5% in 2022. A total of 274 (62.1%) Cochrane systematic reviews had their protocols published before 2018; only one used risk of bias 2.0 tool and reported the change of versions in the “Differences between protocol and revision” section. CONCLUSION: The Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool has low adherence among Cochrane protocols and systematic reviews. Further efforts are necessary to facilitate the implementation of this new tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10004297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Associação Médica Brasileira
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100042972023-03-11 Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera Sá, Kamilla Mayr Martins Santos, Giovanna Marcílio Santos, Elaine Marcílio Pacheco, Rafael Leite Riera, Rachel Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the frequency of Cochrane systematic reviews and Cochrane systematic reviews protocols using (or planning to use) the risk of bias 2.0 tool to assess the risk of bias of the included randomized clinical trials. STUDY DESIGN: This is a meta-research study. METHODS: We included Cochrane systematic reviews or Cochrane systematic reviews protocols that planned to include randomized clinical trials. We assessed the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and screened for issues published after the launch of risk of bias 2.0 tool (2019–2022). Two independent investigators performed the study selection and data extraction. RESULTS: We analyzed 440 Cochrane systematic reviews and 536 Cochrane systematic reviews protocols. Overall, 4.8% of the Cochrane systematic reviews and 28.5% of the Cochrane systematic reviews protocols used or planned to use risk of bias 2.0 tool. Although low, adherence is increasing over time. In 2019, 0% of Cochrane systematic reviews used risk of bias 2.0 tool, compared to 24.1% in 2022. In Cochrane systematic reviews protocols, adherence increased from 6.9% in 2019 to 41.5% in 2022. A total of 274 (62.1%) Cochrane systematic reviews had their protocols published before 2018; only one used risk of bias 2.0 tool and reported the change of versions in the “Differences between protocol and revision” section. CONCLUSION: The Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool has low adherence among Cochrane protocols and systematic reviews. Further efforts are necessary to facilitate the implementation of this new tool. Associação Médica Brasileira 2023-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10004297/ /pubmed/36820779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20221593 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera
Sá, Kamilla Mayr Martins
Santos, Giovanna Marcílio
Santos, Elaine Marcílio
Pacheco, Rafael Leite
Riera, Rachel
Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool
title Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool
title_full Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool
title_fullStr Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool
title_full_unstemmed Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool
title_short Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool
title_sort most cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36820779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20221593
work_keys_str_mv AT martimbiancoanaluizacabrera mostcochranesystematicreviewsandprotocolsdidnotadheretothecochranesriskofbias20tool
AT sakamillamayrmartins mostcochranesystematicreviewsandprotocolsdidnotadheretothecochranesriskofbias20tool
AT santosgiovannamarcilio mostcochranesystematicreviewsandprotocolsdidnotadheretothecochranesriskofbias20tool
AT santoselainemarcilio mostcochranesystematicreviewsandprotocolsdidnotadheretothecochranesriskofbias20tool
AT pachecorafaelleite mostcochranesystematicreviewsandprotocolsdidnotadheretothecochranesriskofbias20tool
AT rierarachel mostcochranesystematicreviewsandprotocolsdidnotadheretothecochranesriskofbias20tool