Cargando…

An Analytical Model for the Normal Contact Stiffness of Mechanical Joint Surfaces Based on Parabolic Cylindrical Asperities

The analytical results of normal contact stiffness for mechanical joint surfaces are quite different from the experimental data. So, this paper proposes an analytical model based on parabolic cylindrical asperity that considers the micro-topography of machined surfaces and how they were made. First,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bai, Yuzhu, An, Qi, Suo, Shuangfu, Wang, Weikun, Jia, Xiaohong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902999
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16051883
_version_ 1784904840699183104
author Bai, Yuzhu
An, Qi
Suo, Shuangfu
Wang, Weikun
Jia, Xiaohong
author_facet Bai, Yuzhu
An, Qi
Suo, Shuangfu
Wang, Weikun
Jia, Xiaohong
author_sort Bai, Yuzhu
collection PubMed
description The analytical results of normal contact stiffness for mechanical joint surfaces are quite different from the experimental data. So, this paper proposes an analytical model based on parabolic cylindrical asperity that considers the micro-topography of machined surfaces and how they were made. First, the topography of a machined surface was considered. Then, the parabolic cylindrical asperity and Gaussian distribution were used to create a hypothetical surface that better matches the real topography. Second, based on the hypothetical surface, the relationship between indentation depth and contact force in the elastic, elastoplastic, and plastic deformation intervals of the asperity was recalculated, and the theoretical analytical model of normal contact stiffness was obtained. Finally, an experimental test platform was then constructed, and the numerical simulation results were compared with the experimental results. At the same time, the numerical simulation results of the proposed model, the J. A. Greenwood and J. B. P. Williamson (GW) model, the W. R. Chang, I. Etsion, and D. B. Bogy (CEB) model, and the L. Kogut and I. Etsion (KE) model were compared with the experimental results. The results show that when roughness is Sa 1.6 μm, the maximum relative errors are 2.56%, 157.9%, 134%, and 90.3%, respectively. When roughness is Sa 3.2 μm, the maximum relative errors are 2.92%, 152.4%, 108.4%, and 75.1%, respectively. When roughness is Sa 4.5 μm, the maximum relative errors are 2.89%, 158.07%, 68.4%, and 46.13%, respectively. When roughness is Sa 5.8 μm, the maximum relative errors are 2.89%, 201.57%, 110.26%, and 73.18%, respectively. The comparison results demonstrate that the suggested model is accurate. This new method for examining the contact characteristics of mechanical joint surfaces uses the proposed model in conjunction with a micro-topography examination of an actual machined surface.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10004469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100044692023-03-11 An Analytical Model for the Normal Contact Stiffness of Mechanical Joint Surfaces Based on Parabolic Cylindrical Asperities Bai, Yuzhu An, Qi Suo, Shuangfu Wang, Weikun Jia, Xiaohong Materials (Basel) Article The analytical results of normal contact stiffness for mechanical joint surfaces are quite different from the experimental data. So, this paper proposes an analytical model based on parabolic cylindrical asperity that considers the micro-topography of machined surfaces and how they were made. First, the topography of a machined surface was considered. Then, the parabolic cylindrical asperity and Gaussian distribution were used to create a hypothetical surface that better matches the real topography. Second, based on the hypothetical surface, the relationship between indentation depth and contact force in the elastic, elastoplastic, and plastic deformation intervals of the asperity was recalculated, and the theoretical analytical model of normal contact stiffness was obtained. Finally, an experimental test platform was then constructed, and the numerical simulation results were compared with the experimental results. At the same time, the numerical simulation results of the proposed model, the J. A. Greenwood and J. B. P. Williamson (GW) model, the W. R. Chang, I. Etsion, and D. B. Bogy (CEB) model, and the L. Kogut and I. Etsion (KE) model were compared with the experimental results. The results show that when roughness is Sa 1.6 μm, the maximum relative errors are 2.56%, 157.9%, 134%, and 90.3%, respectively. When roughness is Sa 3.2 μm, the maximum relative errors are 2.92%, 152.4%, 108.4%, and 75.1%, respectively. When roughness is Sa 4.5 μm, the maximum relative errors are 2.89%, 158.07%, 68.4%, and 46.13%, respectively. When roughness is Sa 5.8 μm, the maximum relative errors are 2.89%, 201.57%, 110.26%, and 73.18%, respectively. The comparison results demonstrate that the suggested model is accurate. This new method for examining the contact characteristics of mechanical joint surfaces uses the proposed model in conjunction with a micro-topography examination of an actual machined surface. MDPI 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10004469/ /pubmed/36902999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16051883 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bai, Yuzhu
An, Qi
Suo, Shuangfu
Wang, Weikun
Jia, Xiaohong
An Analytical Model for the Normal Contact Stiffness of Mechanical Joint Surfaces Based on Parabolic Cylindrical Asperities
title An Analytical Model for the Normal Contact Stiffness of Mechanical Joint Surfaces Based on Parabolic Cylindrical Asperities
title_full An Analytical Model for the Normal Contact Stiffness of Mechanical Joint Surfaces Based on Parabolic Cylindrical Asperities
title_fullStr An Analytical Model for the Normal Contact Stiffness of Mechanical Joint Surfaces Based on Parabolic Cylindrical Asperities
title_full_unstemmed An Analytical Model for the Normal Contact Stiffness of Mechanical Joint Surfaces Based on Parabolic Cylindrical Asperities
title_short An Analytical Model for the Normal Contact Stiffness of Mechanical Joint Surfaces Based on Parabolic Cylindrical Asperities
title_sort analytical model for the normal contact stiffness of mechanical joint surfaces based on parabolic cylindrical asperities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902999
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16051883
work_keys_str_mv AT baiyuzhu ananalyticalmodelforthenormalcontactstiffnessofmechanicaljointsurfacesbasedonparaboliccylindricalasperities
AT anqi ananalyticalmodelforthenormalcontactstiffnessofmechanicaljointsurfacesbasedonparaboliccylindricalasperities
AT suoshuangfu ananalyticalmodelforthenormalcontactstiffnessofmechanicaljointsurfacesbasedonparaboliccylindricalasperities
AT wangweikun ananalyticalmodelforthenormalcontactstiffnessofmechanicaljointsurfacesbasedonparaboliccylindricalasperities
AT jiaxiaohong ananalyticalmodelforthenormalcontactstiffnessofmechanicaljointsurfacesbasedonparaboliccylindricalasperities
AT baiyuzhu analyticalmodelforthenormalcontactstiffnessofmechanicaljointsurfacesbasedonparaboliccylindricalasperities
AT anqi analyticalmodelforthenormalcontactstiffnessofmechanicaljointsurfacesbasedonparaboliccylindricalasperities
AT suoshuangfu analyticalmodelforthenormalcontactstiffnessofmechanicaljointsurfacesbasedonparaboliccylindricalasperities
AT wangweikun analyticalmodelforthenormalcontactstiffnessofmechanicaljointsurfacesbasedonparaboliccylindricalasperities
AT jiaxiaohong analyticalmodelforthenormalcontactstiffnessofmechanicaljointsurfacesbasedonparaboliccylindricalasperities