Cargando…
An Analytical Model for the Normal Contact Stiffness of Mechanical Joint Surfaces Based on Parabolic Cylindrical Asperities
The analytical results of normal contact stiffness for mechanical joint surfaces are quite different from the experimental data. So, this paper proposes an analytical model based on parabolic cylindrical asperity that considers the micro-topography of machined surfaces and how they were made. First,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16051883 |
_version_ | 1784904840699183104 |
---|---|
author | Bai, Yuzhu An, Qi Suo, Shuangfu Wang, Weikun Jia, Xiaohong |
author_facet | Bai, Yuzhu An, Qi Suo, Shuangfu Wang, Weikun Jia, Xiaohong |
author_sort | Bai, Yuzhu |
collection | PubMed |
description | The analytical results of normal contact stiffness for mechanical joint surfaces are quite different from the experimental data. So, this paper proposes an analytical model based on parabolic cylindrical asperity that considers the micro-topography of machined surfaces and how they were made. First, the topography of a machined surface was considered. Then, the parabolic cylindrical asperity and Gaussian distribution were used to create a hypothetical surface that better matches the real topography. Second, based on the hypothetical surface, the relationship between indentation depth and contact force in the elastic, elastoplastic, and plastic deformation intervals of the asperity was recalculated, and the theoretical analytical model of normal contact stiffness was obtained. Finally, an experimental test platform was then constructed, and the numerical simulation results were compared with the experimental results. At the same time, the numerical simulation results of the proposed model, the J. A. Greenwood and J. B. P. Williamson (GW) model, the W. R. Chang, I. Etsion, and D. B. Bogy (CEB) model, and the L. Kogut and I. Etsion (KE) model were compared with the experimental results. The results show that when roughness is Sa 1.6 μm, the maximum relative errors are 2.56%, 157.9%, 134%, and 90.3%, respectively. When roughness is Sa 3.2 μm, the maximum relative errors are 2.92%, 152.4%, 108.4%, and 75.1%, respectively. When roughness is Sa 4.5 μm, the maximum relative errors are 2.89%, 158.07%, 68.4%, and 46.13%, respectively. When roughness is Sa 5.8 μm, the maximum relative errors are 2.89%, 201.57%, 110.26%, and 73.18%, respectively. The comparison results demonstrate that the suggested model is accurate. This new method for examining the contact characteristics of mechanical joint surfaces uses the proposed model in conjunction with a micro-topography examination of an actual machined surface. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10004469 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100044692023-03-11 An Analytical Model for the Normal Contact Stiffness of Mechanical Joint Surfaces Based on Parabolic Cylindrical Asperities Bai, Yuzhu An, Qi Suo, Shuangfu Wang, Weikun Jia, Xiaohong Materials (Basel) Article The analytical results of normal contact stiffness for mechanical joint surfaces are quite different from the experimental data. So, this paper proposes an analytical model based on parabolic cylindrical asperity that considers the micro-topography of machined surfaces and how they were made. First, the topography of a machined surface was considered. Then, the parabolic cylindrical asperity and Gaussian distribution were used to create a hypothetical surface that better matches the real topography. Second, based on the hypothetical surface, the relationship between indentation depth and contact force in the elastic, elastoplastic, and plastic deformation intervals of the asperity was recalculated, and the theoretical analytical model of normal contact stiffness was obtained. Finally, an experimental test platform was then constructed, and the numerical simulation results were compared with the experimental results. At the same time, the numerical simulation results of the proposed model, the J. A. Greenwood and J. B. P. Williamson (GW) model, the W. R. Chang, I. Etsion, and D. B. Bogy (CEB) model, and the L. Kogut and I. Etsion (KE) model were compared with the experimental results. The results show that when roughness is Sa 1.6 μm, the maximum relative errors are 2.56%, 157.9%, 134%, and 90.3%, respectively. When roughness is Sa 3.2 μm, the maximum relative errors are 2.92%, 152.4%, 108.4%, and 75.1%, respectively. When roughness is Sa 4.5 μm, the maximum relative errors are 2.89%, 158.07%, 68.4%, and 46.13%, respectively. When roughness is Sa 5.8 μm, the maximum relative errors are 2.89%, 201.57%, 110.26%, and 73.18%, respectively. The comparison results demonstrate that the suggested model is accurate. This new method for examining the contact characteristics of mechanical joint surfaces uses the proposed model in conjunction with a micro-topography examination of an actual machined surface. MDPI 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10004469/ /pubmed/36902999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16051883 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bai, Yuzhu An, Qi Suo, Shuangfu Wang, Weikun Jia, Xiaohong An Analytical Model for the Normal Contact Stiffness of Mechanical Joint Surfaces Based on Parabolic Cylindrical Asperities |
title | An Analytical Model for the Normal Contact Stiffness of Mechanical Joint Surfaces Based on Parabolic Cylindrical Asperities |
title_full | An Analytical Model for the Normal Contact Stiffness of Mechanical Joint Surfaces Based on Parabolic Cylindrical Asperities |
title_fullStr | An Analytical Model for the Normal Contact Stiffness of Mechanical Joint Surfaces Based on Parabolic Cylindrical Asperities |
title_full_unstemmed | An Analytical Model for the Normal Contact Stiffness of Mechanical Joint Surfaces Based on Parabolic Cylindrical Asperities |
title_short | An Analytical Model for the Normal Contact Stiffness of Mechanical Joint Surfaces Based on Parabolic Cylindrical Asperities |
title_sort | analytical model for the normal contact stiffness of mechanical joint surfaces based on parabolic cylindrical asperities |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16051883 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baiyuzhu ananalyticalmodelforthenormalcontactstiffnessofmechanicaljointsurfacesbasedonparaboliccylindricalasperities AT anqi ananalyticalmodelforthenormalcontactstiffnessofmechanicaljointsurfacesbasedonparaboliccylindricalasperities AT suoshuangfu ananalyticalmodelforthenormalcontactstiffnessofmechanicaljointsurfacesbasedonparaboliccylindricalasperities AT wangweikun ananalyticalmodelforthenormalcontactstiffnessofmechanicaljointsurfacesbasedonparaboliccylindricalasperities AT jiaxiaohong ananalyticalmodelforthenormalcontactstiffnessofmechanicaljointsurfacesbasedonparaboliccylindricalasperities AT baiyuzhu analyticalmodelforthenormalcontactstiffnessofmechanicaljointsurfacesbasedonparaboliccylindricalasperities AT anqi analyticalmodelforthenormalcontactstiffnessofmechanicaljointsurfacesbasedonparaboliccylindricalasperities AT suoshuangfu analyticalmodelforthenormalcontactstiffnessofmechanicaljointsurfacesbasedonparaboliccylindricalasperities AT wangweikun analyticalmodelforthenormalcontactstiffnessofmechanicaljointsurfacesbasedonparaboliccylindricalasperities AT jiaxiaohong analyticalmodelforthenormalcontactstiffnessofmechanicaljointsurfacesbasedonparaboliccylindricalasperities |