Cargando…
Electropolishing Stainless Steel Optimization Using Surface Quality, Dimensional Accuracy, and Electrical Consumption Criteria
Electropolishing (EP) processes require high electrical consumption that must be optimized to minimize production costs without sacrificing the objectives of surface quality and dimensional accuracy. The aim of the present paper was to analyze the effects of the interelectrode gap, initial surface r...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902885 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16051770 |
_version_ | 1784904891511078912 |
---|---|
author | Beamud-González, Elena María Núñez-López, Pedro José García-Plaza, Eustaquio |
author_facet | Beamud-González, Elena María Núñez-López, Pedro José García-Plaza, Eustaquio |
author_sort | Beamud-González, Elena María |
collection | PubMed |
description | Electropolishing (EP) processes require high electrical consumption that must be optimized to minimize production costs without sacrificing the objectives of surface quality and dimensional accuracy. The aim of the present paper was to analyze the effects of the interelectrode gap, initial surface roughness, electrolyte temperature, current density, and EP time on aspects of the EP process applied to AISI 316L stainless steel, which have not been examined in the literature, such as polishing rate, final surface roughness, dimensional accuracy, and electrical consumption cost. In addition, the paper aimed to obtain optimum individual and multi-objective considering criteria of surface quality, dimensional accuracy, and electrical consumption cost. The results showed that the electrode gap was not significant on the surface finish or current density, and the EP time was the parameter having the greatest effect on all criteria analyzed, with a temperature of 35 °C showing the best electrolyte performance. The initial surface texture with the lowest roughness [Formula: see text] (0.5 ≤ Ra ≤ 0.8 μm) obtained the best results with a maximum polishing rate of ~90% and minimum final roughness (Ra) of ~0.035 μm. The response surface methodology showed the EP parameter effects and the optimum individual objective. The desirability function obtained the best global multi-objective optimum, while the overlapping contour plot provided optimum individual and simultaneous per polishing range. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10004669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100046692023-03-11 Electropolishing Stainless Steel Optimization Using Surface Quality, Dimensional Accuracy, and Electrical Consumption Criteria Beamud-González, Elena María Núñez-López, Pedro José García-Plaza, Eustaquio Materials (Basel) Article Electropolishing (EP) processes require high electrical consumption that must be optimized to minimize production costs without sacrificing the objectives of surface quality and dimensional accuracy. The aim of the present paper was to analyze the effects of the interelectrode gap, initial surface roughness, electrolyte temperature, current density, and EP time on aspects of the EP process applied to AISI 316L stainless steel, which have not been examined in the literature, such as polishing rate, final surface roughness, dimensional accuracy, and electrical consumption cost. In addition, the paper aimed to obtain optimum individual and multi-objective considering criteria of surface quality, dimensional accuracy, and electrical consumption cost. The results showed that the electrode gap was not significant on the surface finish or current density, and the EP time was the parameter having the greatest effect on all criteria analyzed, with a temperature of 35 °C showing the best electrolyte performance. The initial surface texture with the lowest roughness [Formula: see text] (0.5 ≤ Ra ≤ 0.8 μm) obtained the best results with a maximum polishing rate of ~90% and minimum final roughness (Ra) of ~0.035 μm. The response surface methodology showed the EP parameter effects and the optimum individual objective. The desirability function obtained the best global multi-objective optimum, while the overlapping contour plot provided optimum individual and simultaneous per polishing range. MDPI 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10004669/ /pubmed/36902885 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16051770 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Beamud-González, Elena María Núñez-López, Pedro José García-Plaza, Eustaquio Electropolishing Stainless Steel Optimization Using Surface Quality, Dimensional Accuracy, and Electrical Consumption Criteria |
title | Electropolishing Stainless Steel Optimization Using Surface Quality, Dimensional Accuracy, and Electrical Consumption Criteria |
title_full | Electropolishing Stainless Steel Optimization Using Surface Quality, Dimensional Accuracy, and Electrical Consumption Criteria |
title_fullStr | Electropolishing Stainless Steel Optimization Using Surface Quality, Dimensional Accuracy, and Electrical Consumption Criteria |
title_full_unstemmed | Electropolishing Stainless Steel Optimization Using Surface Quality, Dimensional Accuracy, and Electrical Consumption Criteria |
title_short | Electropolishing Stainless Steel Optimization Using Surface Quality, Dimensional Accuracy, and Electrical Consumption Criteria |
title_sort | electropolishing stainless steel optimization using surface quality, dimensional accuracy, and electrical consumption criteria |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902885 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16051770 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beamudgonzalezelenamaria electropolishingstainlesssteeloptimizationusingsurfacequalitydimensionalaccuracyandelectricalconsumptioncriteria AT nunezlopezpedrojose electropolishingstainlesssteeloptimizationusingsurfacequalitydimensionalaccuracyandelectricalconsumptioncriteria AT garciaplazaeustaquio electropolishingstainlesssteeloptimizationusingsurfacequalitydimensionalaccuracyandelectricalconsumptioncriteria |