Cargando…
Impact of Final Irrigation Protocol on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Two Types of Endodontic Sealers
Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the final irrigation protocol on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based sealers when compared to an epoxy resin-based sealer. Materials and Methods: Eighty-four single-rooted mandibular human premolars were shaped using the R25(®)...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902876 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16051761 |
_version_ | 1784904900173365248 |
---|---|
author | Sfeir, Germain Bukiet, Frédéric Hage, Wajih El Hachem, Roula Zogheib, Carla |
author_facet | Sfeir, Germain Bukiet, Frédéric Hage, Wajih El Hachem, Roula Zogheib, Carla |
author_sort | Sfeir, Germain |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the final irrigation protocol on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based sealers when compared to an epoxy resin-based sealer. Materials and Methods: Eighty-four single-rooted mandibular human premolars were shaped using the R25(®) instrument (Reciproc, VDW, Munich, Germany) and then divided into three subgroups of 28 roots each depending on the final irrigation protocol: EDTA (ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid) and NaOCl activation, Dual Rinse(®) HEDP (1-hydroxyethane 1,1-diphosphonate) activation or sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) activation. Then, each subgroup was divided into two groups (14 each) according to the sealer used (AH Plus Jet(®) or Total Fill BC Sealer(®)) for single-cone obturation. Dislodgement resistance using a universal testing machine, samples’ push-out bond strength and failure mode under magnification were determined. Results: EDTA/Total Fill BC Sealer(®) showed significantly greater values of push-out bond strength compared with HEDP/Total Fill BC Sealer(®) and NaOCl/AH Plus Jet(®), with no statistical difference with EDTA/AH Plus Jet(®), HEDP/AH Plus Jet(®) and NaOCl/Total Fill BC Sealer(®), whereas HEDP/Total Fill BC Sealer(®) showed significantly lower values of push-out bond strength. The apical third demonstrated higher means of push-out bond strength compared with middle and apical thirds. The most common failure mode was cohesive but showed no statistical difference compared to other types. Conclusions: Irrigation solution and final irrigation protocol affect the adhesion of calcium silicate-based sealers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10004703 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100047032023-03-11 Impact of Final Irrigation Protocol on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Two Types of Endodontic Sealers Sfeir, Germain Bukiet, Frédéric Hage, Wajih El Hachem, Roula Zogheib, Carla Materials (Basel) Article Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the final irrigation protocol on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based sealers when compared to an epoxy resin-based sealer. Materials and Methods: Eighty-four single-rooted mandibular human premolars were shaped using the R25(®) instrument (Reciproc, VDW, Munich, Germany) and then divided into three subgroups of 28 roots each depending on the final irrigation protocol: EDTA (ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid) and NaOCl activation, Dual Rinse(®) HEDP (1-hydroxyethane 1,1-diphosphonate) activation or sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) activation. Then, each subgroup was divided into two groups (14 each) according to the sealer used (AH Plus Jet(®) or Total Fill BC Sealer(®)) for single-cone obturation. Dislodgement resistance using a universal testing machine, samples’ push-out bond strength and failure mode under magnification were determined. Results: EDTA/Total Fill BC Sealer(®) showed significantly greater values of push-out bond strength compared with HEDP/Total Fill BC Sealer(®) and NaOCl/AH Plus Jet(®), with no statistical difference with EDTA/AH Plus Jet(®), HEDP/AH Plus Jet(®) and NaOCl/Total Fill BC Sealer(®), whereas HEDP/Total Fill BC Sealer(®) showed significantly lower values of push-out bond strength. The apical third demonstrated higher means of push-out bond strength compared with middle and apical thirds. The most common failure mode was cohesive but showed no statistical difference compared to other types. Conclusions: Irrigation solution and final irrigation protocol affect the adhesion of calcium silicate-based sealers. MDPI 2023-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10004703/ /pubmed/36902876 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16051761 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sfeir, Germain Bukiet, Frédéric Hage, Wajih El Hachem, Roula Zogheib, Carla Impact of Final Irrigation Protocol on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Two Types of Endodontic Sealers |
title | Impact of Final Irrigation Protocol on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Two Types of Endodontic Sealers |
title_full | Impact of Final Irrigation Protocol on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Two Types of Endodontic Sealers |
title_fullStr | Impact of Final Irrigation Protocol on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Two Types of Endodontic Sealers |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Final Irrigation Protocol on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Two Types of Endodontic Sealers |
title_short | Impact of Final Irrigation Protocol on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Two Types of Endodontic Sealers |
title_sort | impact of final irrigation protocol on the push-out bond strength of two types of endodontic sealers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10004703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36902876 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16051761 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sfeirgermain impactoffinalirrigationprotocolonthepushoutbondstrengthoftwotypesofendodonticsealers AT bukietfrederic impactoffinalirrigationprotocolonthepushoutbondstrengthoftwotypesofendodonticsealers AT hagewajih impactoffinalirrigationprotocolonthepushoutbondstrengthoftwotypesofendodonticsealers AT elhachemroula impactoffinalirrigationprotocolonthepushoutbondstrengthoftwotypesofendodonticsealers AT zogheibcarla impactoffinalirrigationprotocolonthepushoutbondstrengthoftwotypesofendodonticsealers |